Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • State Supreme Court rules in favor of homeowners
    Rooftop solar panels installed on a row of homes
    Rooftop solar panels installed on homes in Folsom.

    Topline:

    The California Supreme Court today told a lower court to revisit a ruling that upheld reduced payments to solar panel owners for selling excess power back to utility companies. Justices did not rule on whether the changes to the solar program were legal, requiring the court of appeals to determine this.

    The backstory: Utilities pay solar panel owners for their excess power under a program known as “net energy metering.” In previous iterations of the program, utilities paid solar customers a retail rate for their extra energy, which is the same price the utilities would charge other customers when they resold that energy. This was changed under the current iteration of the program — which instead gives customers the “avoided cost,” which is how much utilities save by not buying that power on the wholesale market. Utility commissioners ruled in favor of power companies, which argued that older versions of the program created an unfair cost burden on customers. Those without rooftop solar, utilities said, have to pay more than their peers for routine maintenance to the grid.

    About the lawsuit: At issue is a 2022 decision by state regulators to reduce by about 75% payments to solar panel owners for excess power. The change was intended to help make bills affordable for all customers while still encouraging the adoption of renewable energy sources. Three environmental groups argued in the case that the state utility commission’s decision left out crucial considerations around benefits to customers and disadvantaged communities.

    What's next?: "They basically said the lower court kind of punted on the whole substance of the [solar payments] decision,” Bernadette Del Chiaro, vice president for California at the Environmental Working Group, said. Whether or not the change in how solar panel owners are paid is legal will be left to the lower courts.

    Read on ... for more detail on the decision.

    The California Supreme Court today sided with environmental groups in a case seen as pivotal for the proliferation of rooftop solar power in California.

    About this article

    In a unanimous vote, justices told a lower court to revisit a ruling that upheld reduced payments to solar panel owners for selling excess power back to utility companies. Justices did not rule on whether the changes to the solar program were legal, requiring the court of appeals to determine this.

    "They basically said the lower court kind of punted on the whole substance of the [solar payments] decision,” Bernadette Del Chiaro, vice president for California at the Environmental Working Group, said. “I do think they’re clearly stating this needs to be reviewed.”

    At issue is a 2022 decision by state regulators to reduce by about 75% payments to solar panel owners for excess power. The change was intended to help make bills affordable for all customers while still encouraging the adoption of renewable energy sources. Three environmental groups that brought the lawsuit — the Center for Biological Diversity, The Protect our Communities Foundation, and the Environmental Working Group — argued in the case that the state utility commission’s decision left out crucial considerations around benefits to customers and disadvantaged communities.

    "We don’t need [to be in] an affordability crisis if we have more local generation," Roger Lin, senior attorney fro the Center for Biological Diversity, said.

    Utilities pay solar panel owners for their excess power under a program known as “net energy metering.” In previous iterations of the program — “NEM 1” and “NEM 2” — utilities paid solar customers a retail rate for their extra energy, which is the same price the utilities would charge other customers when they resold that energy. This was changed under the current iteration of the program — “NEM 3.0” — which instead gives customers the “avoided cost,” which is how much utilities save by not buying that power on the wholesale market.

    Customers who joined the program after mid-April 2023 receive the new rate, while customers under the prior two versions will continue to receive the old rate for the duration of their contracts, which is typically about 20 years.

    Utility commissioners ruled in favor of power companies, which argued that older versions of the program created an unfair cost burden on customers. Those without rooftop solar, utilities said, have to pay more than their peers for routine maintenance to the grid. The groups bringing the lawsuit said this idea is overblown. A court of appeals decision upheld regulators' decision, relying on a legal standard that gives significant deference to decisions made by the California Public Utilities Commission.

    Thursday's decision said the court of appeals "erred" by using this standard.

    Whether or not the change in how solar panel owners are paid is legal will be left to the lower courts. But the decision this week could have farther-reaching implications for state utility regulators.

    Advocates said the decision reinforces that the utilities' commission must ensure that its decisions fit squarely within the law.

    "For too long, they really have operated in a black box behind a shroud of complexity," Del Chiaro said. "Consumers and the planet have consistently lost out as a result of that.”

    The fallout from the utility commission’s 2022 net metering decision included an 82% drop in customers requesting connections for rooftop solar installations, and industry groups expected a loss of about 17,000 jobs during the first year of the change.

  • Lead singer of The Mavericks died Monday

    Topline:

    Raul Malo, the leader of the country band The Mavericks and one of the most recognizable voices in roots music, died Monday night, according to a representative of the band. The guitarist and singer had been battling cancer.

    Why it matters: Over a career that lasted four decades, The Mavericks lived up to the band's name, challenging expectations and following a roadmap crafted by Malo's expansive musical upbringing as the son of Cuban immigrants in Miami.

    Why now: He was hospitalized last week, forcing him to miss tribute shows staged in his honor at the Ryman Auditorium over the weekend. He was 60 years old.

    Raul Malo, the leader of the country band The Mavericks and one of the most recognizable voices in roots music, died Monday night, according to a representative of the band. The guitarist and singer had been battling cancer.

    He was hospitalized last week, forcing him to miss tribute shows staged in his honor at the Ryman Auditorium over the weekend. He was 60 years old.

    "No one embodied life and love, joy and passion, family, friends, music and adventure the way our beloved Raul did," read a statement released by his family.

    Malo's group, The Mavericks, mourned the loss of their leader in a social post.

    "Anyone with the pleasure of being in Raul's orbit knew that he was a force of human nature, with an infectious energy," the statement read. "Over a career of more than three decades entertaining millions around the globe, his towering creative contributions and unrivaled, generational talent created the kind of multicultural American music reaching far beyond America itself."

    Over a career that lasted four decades, The Mavericks lived up to the band's name, challenging expectations and following a roadmap crafted by Malo's expansive musical upbringing as the son of Cuban immigrants in Miami.

    "I grew up in a very musical household. There was all kinds of music around always," he told WHYY's Fresh Air in 1995. "We listened to everything from Hank Williams to Celia Cruz to Sam Cooke to Bobby Darin. It didn't matter."

    In 1992, Malo told NPR that his widespread influences weren't always understood or appreciated in his South Florida hometown, but he said that his struggle to fit in taught him to trust his instincts. Malo had become the guitarist and lead singer for The Mavericks in 1989, alongside co-founders Robert Reynolds and Paul Deakin, and his roaring, sentimental voice defined the band's sound and remained its constant as the group's catalog moved from slow, tender ballads to full-throttle rock songs. In 1995, the band released its biggest hit with "All You Ever Do Is Bring Me Down," a swinging country song featuring an assist from Tex-Mex accordion legend Flaco Jimenez.

    As the band grew in members and devoted listeners, The Mavericks continued to push the boundaries of American music, weaving a richly layered tapestry of textures and stories. With more than a dozen studio albums, The Mavericks collected praise and recognition from the Academy of Country Music, the Country Music Association and the Recording Academy. Although they took a hiatus for several years, Malo never stopped making music — and returned to his bandmates with renewed inspiration.

    Following its 30th anniversary, the group released its first full-length Spanish album in 2020, aptly titled En Español. The record reimagined Latin standards and folklore-tinged popular tunes; it also made an implicit political statement about Latin music's contributions to American culture.

    "In our own little way, if we could get somebody that perhaps is on the fence on issues and hears us singing in Spanish and perhaps reminds them of the beautiful cultures that make up what this country is trying to be and what it should be, so be it," Malo told NPR at the time. "Yeah, I'm OK with that."

    The following year, the Americana Music Association recognized The Mavericks with the Trailblazer Award. In 2024, the band released its last studio album, Moon & Stars. The release coincided with news of Malo's cancer diagnosis, which he discussed openly with NPR's Ayesha Rascoe.

    Before being hospitalized last week, Malo had been scheduled to perform with The Mavericks at a pair of tribute concerts held this past weekend at the legendary Ryman Auditorium in Nashville. Over 30 artists, including Patty Griffin, Jim Lauderdale and Steve Earle, still gathered to pay tribute to Malo, with some of the proceeds of the night going to the cancer prevention organization Stand Up To Cancer.

    According to his spokesperson, though Malo was too ill to attend, the concert was streamed to his hospital room Friday night.

    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • Sponsored message
  • Max Huntsman issues criticism of Sheriff's Dept.
    Max Huntsman is a former prosecutor who became L.A. County's inspector general.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department has mostly blocked efforts to investigate misconduct within its ranks, according to the county inspector general, who announced his retirement Tuesday after 12 years on the job.

    Why now: In an open letter, Max Huntsman cited examples of how the county has thwarted his efforts to watchdog the department, which in the past has been plagued by accusations that deputies use excessive force and lie on the job. Huntsman said one example is former Sheriff Alex Villanueva’s misuse of criminal enforcement powers to discredit critics, such as opening an investigation into former County Supervisor Sheila Kuehl.

    “My requests for investigation were rejected,” Huntsman’s letter reads. “Even after receiving an official subpoena, the Sheriff’s Department has failed to turn over records regarding the improper surveillance.”

    He added: “Sometimes members of the public wonder if frightening new surveillance techniques will be used for improper purposes under the guise of criminal investigation. Sadly, the answer is yes.”

    County response: Asked to respond, the Sheriff’s Department issued a statement saying it valued the office of the inspector general and all county oversight bodies and that it wished Huntsman and his family well in his retirement. The department said it “continues to make great strides in advancing the Department in a transparent manner.”

    LAist also reached out to the county CEO and county counsel for comment, but they declined.

    Read on ... for more information on Huntsman's letter.

    The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department has mostly blocked efforts to investigate misconduct within its ranks, according to the county inspector general, who announced his retirement Tuesday after 12 years on the job.

    In an open letter, Max Huntsman cited examples of how the county has thwarted his efforts to watchdog the department, which in the past has been plagued with accusations that deputies use excessive force and lie on the job.

    Huntsman said one example is former Sheriff Alex Villanueva’s misuse of criminal enforcement powers to discredit critics, such as opening an investigation into former County Supervisor Sheila Kuehl.

    Villanueva was sheriff from 2018 to 2022.

    “My requests for investigation were rejected,” Huntsman’s letter reads. “Even after receiving an official subpoena, the Sheriff’s Department has failed to turn over records regarding the improper surveillance.”

    He added: “Sometimes members of the public wonder if frightening new surveillance techniques will be used for improper purposes under the guise of criminal investigation. Sadly, the answer is yes.”

    Before becoming inspector general in 2013, Huntsman, 60, was a deputy district attorney who specialized in public corruption. He told LAist on Tuesday that the inspector general job wasn’t something he wanted initially.

    “I didn’t want to go work for politicians,” he said. “But the need to provide some kind of independent reporting and analysis was significant.”

    The Sheriff’s Department issued a statement saying it valued the Office of the Inspector General and all county oversight bodies and that it wished Huntsman and his family well in his retirement.

    The department said it “continues to make great strides in advancing the department in a transparent manner.”

    LAist also reached out to the county CEO and county counsel for comment, but they declined.

    After George Floyd

    In the letter, Huntsman says the state of California has come a long way in strengthening the power of local law enforcement oversight bodies, in part because of the 2020 murder of George Floyd by police in Minneapolis.

    After widespread protests — and lobbying by Huntsman — the state provided authority to inspectors general to enforce subpoenas requiring law enforcement agencies to hand over documents and authorized external investigation of police misconduct, including deputy gang conduct.

    The Sheriff’s Department — backed by county lawyers — has resisted.

    “Los Angeles County may not follow those laws, but it will not be able to avoid them forever,” Huntsman wrote. “The county refuses to require the photographing of suspected gang tattoos in secretive groups that the undersheriff has identified as violating state law.”

    “Just a few weeks ago, we requested some information regarding an investigation, and a pair of commanders refused to give it to us,” Huntsman said in an interview with LAist.

    Origin of the office 

    The Inspector General’s Office was created by the county Board of Supervisors in 2013 in response to a scandal that included former Sheriff Lee Baca covering up the abuses of jail inmates.

    Baca went to federal prison.

    Since then, the office has issued dozens of reports with recommendations for improving living conditions inside jails that some have described as “filthy,” stopping abuses of juveniles inside juvenile halls and providing shower privacy for inmates as part of the requirements under the Prison Rape Elimination Act.

    “All of these abuses were reported by the Office of Inspector General and recommendations were ignored,” Huntsman wrote. Often, it took court orders to enact change.

    “When we first blew the whistle on the torturous chaining of mentally ill prisoners to benches for 36 hours at a time, it was only a court order that ended the practice,” he wrote. “Time and time again, this pattern repeated itself.”

    Huntsman wrote the county has permitted the Sheriff’s Department to block oversight and defunded the Office of Inspector General by removing a third of its staff.

    “It's not surprising the county has driven out two successive chairs of the Sheriff Civilian Oversight Commission,” he wrote.

    “Government always claims to value transparency and accountability, but shooting the messenger is still the most common response to criticism,” Huntsman wrote.

    Despite setbacks, Huntsman values work 

    Huntsman told LAist on Tuesday that he was proud of his career as a public servant.

    “I’ve really enjoyed the work and I’m sad to have it end,” he said.

    It’s a sentiment he echoed in his letter, adding that despite the setbacks and roadblocks, he was proud of the people with whom he shared the office.

    “It has been my honor to work with a talented, brave and tireless group of public servants to ensure that the public knows what its government is doing,” he wrote.

    He noted the inspector general’s reports are fact-checked by the office and public.

    “When government abuses occur, they are sometimes kept secret, but that is no longer the case for much of what is happening in Los Angeles County,” Huntsman wrote. “What you do about it is up to you.,”

    Huntsman’s last day is Friday.

  • The move is meant to help clear city streets
    A person wearing a yellow safety shirt and black pants unloads an RV with an X on its side off a tow truck.
    In a 12-to-3 vote, the L.A. City Council is moving forward to implement AB 630, a state law that allows abandoned or inoperable RVs worth less than $4,000 to be destroyed.

    Topline:

    The L.A City Council voted 12-3 today to implement a state law that will make it easier to clear some RVs from city streets.

    The backstory: Last month, the council's Transportation Committee voted to bring a proposal before the council to implement a policy change that allows the city to impound and immediately destroy abandoned or inoperable RV's worth less than $4,000. The change is inspired by new state law AB 630 that was created to prevent previously impounded RV's from ending back up on the street.

    The motion, authored by Councilmember Traci Park, reports that abandoned RV's pose as public and safety hazards.

    What's next: Councilmember Nithya Raman requested that an implementation plan be presented to the council's public safety and housing and homelessness committees.

    Go deeper: L.A. pushes policy to make it easier to remove RVs from city streets.

    Topline:

    The L.A City Council voted 12-3 today to implement a state law that will make it easier to clear some RVs from city streets.

    The backstory: Last month, the council's Transportation Committee voted to bring a proposal forward to implement a policy change that allows the city to impound and immediately destroy abandoned or inoperable RVs worth less than $4,000. The change is inspired by new state law AB 630, which was created to prevent previously impounded RVs from ending back up on the street.

    The motion, authored by Councilmember Traci Park, reports that abandoned RVs pose as public and safety hazards.

    What's next: Councilmember Nithya Raman requested that an implementation plan be presented to the council's public safety and housing and homelessness committees.

    Go deeper: L.A. pushes policy to make it easier to remove RVs from city streets.

  • Supes approve rule requiring police to show ID
    A group of people wearing camoflauge uniforms, helmets, face shields and black masks covering their faces are pictured at night
    A line of federal immigration agents wearing masks stands off with protesters near the Glass House Farms facility outside Camarillo on July 10.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors gave its final stamp of approval today to an ordinance requiring law enforcement to display visible identification and banning them from wearing face coverings when working in certain jurisdictions in L.A. County.

    Where it applies: The ordinance will take effect in unincorporated parts of the county. Those include East Los Angeles, South Whittier and Ladera Heights, where a Home Depot has been a repeated target of immigration raids, according to various reports.

    What the supervisors are saying:  “What the federal government is doing is causing extreme fear and chaos and anxiety, particularly among our immigrant community,” said Supervisor Janice Hahn, who introduced the motion, in an interview with LAist before the final vote. “They don't know who's dragging them out of a car. They don't know who's throwing them to the ground at a car wash because they act like secret police.”

    About the vote: Supervisor Lindsay Horvath was not present for the vote but coauthored the ordinance. Supervisor Kathryn Barger abstained. All other county supervisors voted to approve it.

    The back and forth: California passed a similar law, the No Secret Police Act, earlier this year. The Trump administration already is suing the state of California over that law, calling it unconstitutional. For her part, Hahn said that the law is meant to protect residents' constitutional rights, and that legal challenges won’t affect the county’s position “until we're told by a court that it's unconstitutional.”

    The timeline: The new law will go into effect in 30 days.