Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • State Supreme Court rules in favor of homeowners
    Rooftop solar panels installed on a row of homes
    Rooftop solar panels installed on homes in Folsom.

    Topline:

    The California Supreme Court today told a lower court to revisit a ruling that upheld reduced payments to solar panel owners for selling excess power back to utility companies. Justices did not rule on whether the changes to the solar program were legal, requiring the court of appeals to determine this.

    The backstory: Utilities pay solar panel owners for their excess power under a program known as “net energy metering.” In previous iterations of the program, utilities paid solar customers a retail rate for their extra energy, which is the same price the utilities would charge other customers when they resold that energy. This was changed under the current iteration of the program — which instead gives customers the “avoided cost,” which is how much utilities save by not buying that power on the wholesale market. Utility commissioners ruled in favor of power companies, which argued that older versions of the program created an unfair cost burden on customers. Those without rooftop solar, utilities said, have to pay more than their peers for routine maintenance to the grid.

    About the lawsuit: At issue is a 2022 decision by state regulators to reduce by about 75% payments to solar panel owners for excess power. The change was intended to help make bills affordable for all customers while still encouraging the adoption of renewable energy sources. Three environmental groups argued in the case that the state utility commission’s decision left out crucial considerations around benefits to customers and disadvantaged communities.

    What's next?: "They basically said the lower court kind of punted on the whole substance of the [solar payments] decision,” Bernadette Del Chiaro, vice president for California at the Environmental Working Group, said. Whether or not the change in how solar panel owners are paid is legal will be left to the lower courts.

    Read on ... for more detail on the decision.

    The California Supreme Court today sided with environmental groups in a case seen as pivotal for the proliferation of rooftop solar power in California.

    About this article

    In a unanimous vote, justices told a lower court to revisit a ruling that upheld reduced payments to solar panel owners for selling excess power back to utility companies. Justices did not rule on whether the changes to the solar program were legal, requiring the court of appeals to determine this.

    "They basically said the lower court kind of punted on the whole substance of the [solar payments] decision,” Bernadette Del Chiaro, vice president for California at the Environmental Working Group, said. “I do think they’re clearly stating this needs to be reviewed.”

    At issue is a 2022 decision by state regulators to reduce by about 75% payments to solar panel owners for excess power. The change was intended to help make bills affordable for all customers while still encouraging the adoption of renewable energy sources. Three environmental groups that brought the lawsuit — the Center for Biological Diversity, The Protect our Communities Foundation, and the Environmental Working Group — argued in the case that the state utility commission’s decision left out crucial considerations around benefits to customers and disadvantaged communities.

    "We don’t need [to be in] an affordability crisis if we have more local generation," Roger Lin, senior attorney fro the Center for Biological Diversity, said.

    Utilities pay solar panel owners for their excess power under a program known as “net energy metering.” In previous iterations of the program — “NEM 1” and “NEM 2” — utilities paid solar customers a retail rate for their extra energy, which is the same price the utilities would charge other customers when they resold that energy. This was changed under the current iteration of the program — “NEM 3.0” — which instead gives customers the “avoided cost,” which is how much utilities save by not buying that power on the wholesale market.

    Customers who joined the program after mid-April 2023 receive the new rate, while customers under the prior two versions will continue to receive the old rate for the duration of their contracts, which is typically about 20 years.

    Utility commissioners ruled in favor of power companies, which argued that older versions of the program created an unfair cost burden on customers. Those without rooftop solar, utilities said, have to pay more than their peers for routine maintenance to the grid. The groups bringing the lawsuit said this idea is overblown. A court of appeals decision upheld regulators' decision, relying on a legal standard that gives significant deference to decisions made by the California Public Utilities Commission.

    Thursday's decision said the court of appeals "erred" by using this standard.

    Whether or not the change in how solar panel owners are paid is legal will be left to the lower courts. But the decision this week could have farther-reaching implications for state utility regulators.

    Advocates said the decision reinforces that the utilities' commission must ensure that its decisions fit squarely within the law.

    "For too long, they really have operated in a black box behind a shroud of complexity," Del Chiaro said. "Consumers and the planet have consistently lost out as a result of that.”

    The fallout from the utility commission’s 2022 net metering decision included an 82% drop in customers requesting connections for rooftop solar installations, and industry groups expected a loss of about 17,000 jobs during the first year of the change.

  • Jackie and Shadow are parents again
    Two chicks in a nest.
    Jackie and Shadow's new chicks.

    Topline:

    Jackie and Shadow have two new chicks this Easter Sunday.

    Details: The first eaglet arrived last night around 9:30 p.m., the second around 8:30 a.m. this morning.

    Read on and look at footage of the new chicks from the nonprofit, Friends of Big Bear Valley.

    Congrats to Big Bear's celebrity bald eagle couple.

    Jackie and Shadow have two new chicks this Easter Sunday. Thousands of fans have been watching their eggs hatch on the popular nest livestream that made the eagles famous.

    The first eaglet arrived last night around 9:30 p.m., the second followed around 8:30 a.m.

    The nonprofit that runs the livestream, Friends of Big Bear Valley, says dad Shadow showed up after the second hatch and saw his two chicks for the first time.

    Mom Jackie is is showing a natural behavior that’s actually a good sign. The nonprofit says she's salivating more — which helps provide electrolytes and antibodies her chicks need.

    The two eggs each showed signs of a pip — or first crack — on Friday and Saturday.

  • Sponsored message
  • Agreement averts repeat of 2023 strike
    Close up of a building with glass windows for Writers Guild of America West
    The Writers Guild of America West building.

    Topline:

    The Writers Guild of America has announced a tentative four-year contract agreement with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, which represents Hollywood studios, television networks and streaming services.

    Why it matters: The new agreement spans four years, longer than the typical three-year deal. In a social media post, the WGA said the deal "protects writers’ health plan and puts it on a sustainable path, builds on gains from 2023, and helps address free work challenges."

    In a statement posted on its website, AMPTP said, "We look forward to building on this progress as we continue working toward agreements that support long-term industry stability."

    Why now: AMPTP and the WGA have been in negotiations since March. The announcement yesterday came a little under a month before the union's current contract was set to expire on May 1.

    The backstory: In 2023, contract negotiations broke down between writers and producers, which led to a historic five-month writers strike. That strike ended with the WGA notching huge gains in compensation, streaming residuals and AI protections.

    What's next: The tentative agreement still needs to be ratified by the full WGA membership. The union's negotiating committee said union members will receive detailed information in the coming days.

    Topline:

    The Writers Guild of America has announced a tentative four-year contract agreement with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, which represents Hollywood studios, television networks and streaming services.

    Why it matters: The new agreement spans four years, as opposed to the typical three-year deal. In a social media post, the WGA said the deal "protects writers’ health plan and puts it on a sustainable path, builds on gains from 2023, and helps address free work challenges."

    In a statement posted on its website, AMPTP said, "We look forward to building on this progress as we continue working toward agreements that support long-term industry stability."

    Why now: AMPTP and the WGA have been in negotiations since March. The announcement yesterday came a little under a month before the union's current contract was set to expire on May 1.

    The backstory: In 2023, contract negotiations broke down between writers and producers, which led to a historic five-month writers strike. That strike ended with the WGA notching huge gains in compensation, streaming residuals and AI protections.

    What's next: The tentative agreement still needs to be ratified by the full WGA membership. The union's negotiating committee said union members will receive detailed information in the coming days.

  • Road construction starts Monday, will last 60 days
    The front of Hollywood Burbank Airport is seen. Several cars drop off passengers. A "Southwest" plane is seen taking off in the background.
    A Southwest Airlines plane takes off from Burbank. Travelers are advised to arrive early.

    Topline:

    The Hollywood Burbank Airport is advising flyers to arrive at least two hours earlier than usual because of construction slated to begin Monday and last for 60 days.

    What’s closed: One lane of traffic on the southbound side of Hollywood Way near Thornton Avenue will be closed during construction. The sidewalk and bike lane on the west side of Hollywood Way will also be closed.

    What’s the alternative: Officials are advising passengers to use the Empire Avenue entrance, or enter the airport westbound on Thornton Avenue.

    The Hollywood Burbank Airport is advising flyers to arrive at least two hours earlier than usual for the next 60 days because of construction slated to begin Monday.

    Road closures: One lane of traffic on the southbound side of Hollywood Way next to Thornton Avenue will be closed during construction. The sidewalk and bike lane on the west side of Hollywood Way between Winona Avenue and Thornton Avenue will also be closed.

    When: Construction will occur Mondays through Saturdays from 9 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. through June 6.

    Why: Airport spokesperson Mike Christensen told LAist crews are building a retaining wall as part of Hollywood Burbank's passenger terminal construction project.

    Alternatives: Officials recommend passengers use the Empire Avenue entrance or take Thornton Avenue to get to the airport.

  • A Brit's experience of heading to Joshua Tree
    A line of silver Airstream trailers sit on desert land. The sky is full of pink and purples at sunset
    LAist senior editor Suzanne Levy details her encounter with the iconic Joshua tree

    Topline:

    LAist senior editor, Suzanne Levy, who grew up in the UK, tells the story of the first time she went to Joshua Tree and experienced the desert's strange, out of the world landscape.

    On seeing a Joshua Tree: "What? Wait, stop the car. There’s an actual Joshua Tree? It looks like an alien to me!"

    On seeing a desert sunset: "I marveled at the gorgeousness of the sunset, the morphing colors and the vastness of the sky."

    While living in L.A., I’d been hearing about this thing — “the desert.” Seemed a bit odd to someone who lived on the Westside next to the ocean, but OK, you can also see mountains from my house, so why not throw in an entire landscape food group?

    A few years ago, I figured it was time to try it out, and my family and I headed to Joshua Tree for the weekend.

    We began driving east and were soon in that vast no man’s land around the 10 Freeway. On one side, I could see a moving train, with all those boxcars. I was watching, entranced, waiting to see it go past. And it kept going. And going. It was like a vibrant desert serpent, wending its way through the landscape, each boxcar a different hue. It seemed so romantic, and then I thought “in each one, there’s a whole load of hanging car air fresheners, dental floss and Japanese waving cats” and suddenly the spell was broken. Ah well.

    Joshua trees stand against the sky in a desert landscape.
    The eerie, alien Joshua Tree.
    (
    Sean Gallup/Getty Images,
    /
    Getty Images North America
    )

    As we got nearer, I said “Huh, what's that weird thing that looks like an alien?” and my husband said, “Yes, that’s a Joshua Tree.”

    What? Wait, stop the car. There’s an actual Joshua Tree? First, who knew, and second, that is no tree. That, sir, is a weird misshapen cactus, with multiple crooked arms reaching into the air, each with its own spiky fur muff. Kinda like one of those waving inflatable guys if they were static. (Ah, I've been in L.A. too long).

    Bougie smores

    A wide shot of a desert scene with silver trailers silhouetted against a sunset sky.
    The vast desert sky.
    (
    Steve Holtzman
    /
    Courtesy Suzanne Levy
    )

    We finally arrived at our destination, a campsite — OK, a glamping campsite, a whole bunch of airstream trailers laid out with firepits. I knew it was bougie when I went to buy a smores kit from the shop and came back with 70% dark chocolate, artisanal graham crackers and single origin marshmallows. (I made that marshmallow one up, but it really is just a matter of time).

    We made a fire, marveling at the gorgeousness of the sunset, the morphing colors and the vastness of the sky. I sat afterwards watching the flames, the cold air on my skin, under a blanket of stars. Tears pricked my eyes.

    About this story

    LAist Senior Editor Suzanne Levy writes about her experiences as a Brit in the U.S. in her ongoing series: American As A Second language.

    In the morning we headed to Joshua Tree National Park. When we got out of the car, the vista hit me, with that bright, bright sun, strange looking rocky outcrops, and nothing but Joshua trees as far as the eye could see. I thought: I have never seen anything like this. I couldn’t have even imagined something like this. In London, if you go on a day trip, you can go back in time, say to the thatched roofs of the Cotswolds — but not to a different planet.

    What an extraordinary continent this is, I think. I am awestruck by its endless, varied landscapes — the plains, the Rockies, the oceans and the forests. And there’s something particular about the desert — its simplicity, its reduction to just three or four elements, which relaxes you, chills you out.

    I remember heading back to L.A. after the weekend, happy and mellow, smiling as we drove west into the setting sun. It’s a cliche, but the desert does call you back. And I hope to get back there very soon.