Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • CA wildlife officials euthanize four wolves
    A dark gray wolf sits in a field of dry grass.
    California wildlife officials announced Friday that four gray wolves were euthanized because of livestock attacks.

    Topline:

    The California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service recently euthanized four gray wolves because of an “unprecedented” number of livestock attacks, according to the state department Friday.

    Why now?  The action followed months of attempts to reduce the number of livestock attacks, including diversionary feeding, use of drones and 24/7 field presence. Officials said the wolves “became habituated to cattle as a primary food source.” They said the attacks are a threat to livestock and wolf recovery.

    What we know about the pack: The deaths were among the Beyem Seyo pack in Sierra Valley over the past month. One male and two female wolves were euthanized, along with a juvenile wolf that was mistakenly killed. The remains of two other young wolves also were found, but the cause of death is unknown. Juvenile gray wolf deaths due to natural causes are common.

    More on the livestock deaths: The state department reported that between March 28 and Sept. 10, the pack was responsible for 70 livestock losses, or 63% of the total livestock losses across the state during the same time period. CDFW does have a compensation program for livestock owners who have lost animals to wolves.

    Officials said: Jen Benedet, acting deputy director of communications at the California Department of Fish and Wildlife said, “CDFW staff will focus on utilizing the best available science, a strong understanding of wolf biology and successful adaptive wildlife management practices to ensure both gray wolves and California’s communities can thrive together.”

    Background: The gray wolf is a recovering endangered species protected under state and federal law in California. CDFW did not reintroduce the animals to California, but they have returned through on their own from other states. There are several known packs in the state, and you can track them here.

  • What's legal, what's not, why it barely works
    A street vendor stands under a rainbow umbrella peeling fruit in front of a cart. In the distance is an arch with a sign that reads "Whittier Blvd. East Los Angeles."
    A fruit vendor sells on Whittier Boulevard in East L.A.

    Topline:

     A recent AirTalk segment highlights the decades-long debate over street vending in Los Angeles. Despite efforts by the City Council and statewide law, enforcement remains murky at best, even though it's a fixture of Los Angeles culture.

    Why now? During a recent debate, Mayor Karen Bass made a series of comments that cast street vending in an unsavory light, prompting an almost immediate backlash from her opponent, Nithya Raman, who has devised her own nine-point plan to address street vending if elected.

    Why is it important? Street vendors are as much a part of L.A.'s identity as its restaurants — but the system meant to support them is so broken that only a fraction operate with full legal standing. As this becomes a defining issue in the mayor's race, it's worth knowing the difference between political rhetoric and how the rules actually work on the ground.

    Last month, street vending became a flashpoint during one of the recent debates for L.A. mayor when incumbent Karen Bass said, "I do not think that you should have a food vendor in front of a restaurant. Period," drawing a comparison to unhoused encampments.

    The remarks set off an almost immediate backlash. Mayoral candidate Nithya Raman, who has her own 9-point plan to support street vendors, said Bass "took a shot" at the street vending community and reiterated her commitment to work toward regulations and legalizing their operations.

    Bass's office later eased its stance, saying it had directed the LAPD to stop issuing criminal citations to street vendors — and to dismiss any that had been issued in error.

    Street vending remains part of the Los Angeles landscape, and the backlash from the debate brought to light just how confusing its legality can be. To understand how we got here, it helps to start with the basics.

    Is street vending legal?

    Yes. Since SB 946 in 2018, state law has decriminalized it. That means cities and counties can't criminally cite vendors or ban them from specific zones. They can, however, still enforce health and safety rules — things like sidewalk clearance and ADA access.

    So why does it feel unregulated?

    On a recent segment for AirTalk, Memo Torres of L.A. Taco pointed to a stark gap between L.A.'s vending population and its permitted vendors. According to an email from the California Restaurant Association reported by FOX 11, an estimated 50,000 street vendors operate across Los Angeles — yet only 53 hold permits specifically for food sales.

    Why so few permits? 

    Vending requirements largely mirror restaurant-grade standards — large refrigeration units, multi-basin sinks — that don't fit the reality of most vendor setups: flat-top griddles, folding tables, pop-up tents.

    That isn't to say there haven't been efforts by the city to address the permitting gap. In 2024, the City Council, with Raman's backing, voted to drop the annual permit fee from $541 to $27.51.

    Raman's mayoral campaign has since proposed another potential fix: extending a state permit category — currently used by vendors at farmers markets who share equipment like a communal three-compartment sink — to street vendors, so operators wouldn't need their own restaurant-grade setup to qualify.

    What about health and safety?

    County health inspectors technically oversee street food vendors, but both industry and vendor advocates agree enforcement is inconsistent — leaving reliable data on violations hard to come by.

    Are vendors and restaurants actually enemies?

    A 2015 Economic Roundtable study found that businesses located near street vendors were more likely to see job growth than those without nearby vendors.

    What’s next 

    Proposals like Raman's permitting reforms aim to close the gap — but for now, most of L.A.'s vendors remain outside the formal system.

  • Sponsored message
  • LA opens season in Australia against 49ers
    Exterior of the Melbourne Cricket Ground showing two large banners flanking the entrance: one featuring a San Francisco 49ers player in a red jersey on the left, and another featuring a Los Angeles Rams player in a blue jersey on the right. Several people are walking near the "Welcome" entrance below.
    Outside the Melbourne Cricket Ground ahead of the NFL game between the Rams and 49ers. (AP Photo/Asanka Brendon Ratnayake)

    Topline:

    The longest road trip in NFL history has brought the San Francisco 49ers and the Los Angeles Rams to Australia’s sports capital for a season opener in front of more than 100,000 football-hungry fans packed into the Southern Hemisphere’s largest stadium.

    Why it matters: The NFC West rivals are playing Australia’s first NFL game, and the starkly differing ways in which they made this epic journey have attracted almost as much attention as the two star-studded rosters preparing to put on a show.

    The backstory: The 49ers have been Down Under for more than a week, adjusting their body clocks and winning over thousands of Aussie fans who appreciate their commitment to the historic moment. The Rams were only scheduled to arrive in Melbourne around dawn Thursday, roughly 28 hours before the Friday morning kickoff that’s necessary to play the game Thursday night in prime time in the U.S. That’s because head coach Sean McVay is convinced they can thwart jet lag and optimize their game readiness by staying home on California time.

    What's next: The Rams and 49ers kick off at 5:35 p.m. Thursday night on Netflix.

    The longest road trip in NFL history has brought the San Francisco 49ers and the Los Angeles Rams to Australia’s sports capital for a season opener in front of more than 100,000 football-hungry fans packed into the Southern Hemisphere’s largest stadium.

    The NFC West rivals are playing Australia’s first NFL game, and the starkly differing ways in which they made this epic journey have attracted almost as much attention as the two star-studded rosters preparing to put on a show.

    The 49ers have been Down Under for more than a week, adjusting their body clocks in the traditional manner and winning over thousands of Aussie fans who appreciate their commitment to the historic moment.

    The Rams were only scheduled to arrive in Melbourne around dawn Thursday, roughly 28 hours before the Friday morning kickoff that’s necessary to play the game Thursday night in prime time in the U.S. That’s because head coach Sean McVay is convinced they can thwart jet lag and optimize their game readiness by staying home on California time.

    Both teams agree this contrast in preparation is not a referendum on the best way to handle a pair of 16-hour flights with a football game in between — even if the rest of the world might see it that way after the final whistle.

    Instead, this game is primarily a difficult early test for both the Super Bowl favorite Rams and the talent-laden 49ers, who also intend to be a title challenger. The coaching staffs and veteran players all know each other thoroughly after a decade of competition between Shanahan and McVay, who are both constantly looking for an edge.

    “I don’t think there’s any right way to do it,” said defensive end Myles Garrett, who will make his Rams debut in Australia. “They have a plan, and I’m sure they consulted different teams and people to find out a way to combat jet lag and such long travel. We’ve done the same thing. I think we’re both riding our methodologies.”

    Garrett will be joined by star cornerback Trent McDuffie and cornerback Jaylen Watson in their debuts with Los Angeles’ revamped defense.

    But Garrett will not be joined at the MCG by Aaron Donald, who ended his 2 1/2-year retirement late last month. The Rams decided the 35-year-old Donald will stay home as he ramps up deliberately for his return — and that’s a beacon of hope for Shanahan, who was sure his old friend McVay would bring Donald to Australia.

    “I’ve never been more excited to be wrong about something,” Shanahan said.

  • Feds to investigate Men’s Central Jail
    The Jail complex in downtown Los Angeles
    The Jail complex in downtown Los Angeles

    Topline:

    The U.S. Department of Justice announced Wednesday that it has opened an investigation into the Men’s Central Jail in downtown Los Angeles, specifically looking into whether L.A. County has failed to provide environmentally safe, humane and habitable conditions for people held there.

    The details: The jail has long been plagued by allegations of poor conditions. Monitors from the American Civil Liberties Union have documented problems including overcrowding, severe mold and mildew, and rodent infestations.

    The context: The federal investigation is expected to focus on conditions within the facility and not the actions of the county sheriff’s deputies who staff it, according to the Justice Department. The new investigation is separate from a 2015 settlement between the county and federal government, which stemmed from allegations of inadequate mental health care provided at county jails.

    What happens next: Investigators will determine whether the county has violated the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects against cruel and unusual punishment, and 14th Amendment, which guarantees equal protection under the law.

    Reaction: L.A. County Supervisor Kathryn Barger welcomed the investigation, and said she had said for year that the jail was “antiquated, inhumane, and unfit for our workforce and those incarcerated there.”

  • Brush fire sends smoke up over 405
    Smoke rises from a brush fire on a hillside in an aerial photo.
    Smoke rises from a brush fire near the Getty Center on Sept. 9, 2026.

    Topline:

    Firefighters appeared to make quick progress against a brush fire the broke out Wednesday near the Getty Center.

    What we know so far: As of 5 p.m., evacuation warnings had been issued for zones LFD-0895 and LF-0967, although the LAFD said no structures were immediately threatened as the water-dropping helicopters attacked the fire from above.

    Read on ... for more on evacuations and weather conditions.

    This story is no longer being actively updated. For the most up-to-date information about the fire you can check:

    Firefighters appeared to make quick progress against a brush fire the broke out Wednesday near the Getty Center.

    As of 5 p.m., evacuation warnings had been issued for zones LFD-0895 and LF-0967, although the LAFD said no structures were immediately threatened as the water-dropping helicopters attacked the fire from above. Forward progress of the fire was reported stopped shortly after 6 p.m. at a little over 20 acres.

    The fire broke out as Southern California endures high heat and record-breaking humidity.

    The basics

    • Acreage: 20+ acres as of Wednesday evening
    • Containment: Forward progress stopped
    • Structures destroyed: None reported
    • Deaths: None
    • Injuries: Unknown
    • Personnel working on fire: Unknown

    Listen to our Big Burn podcast

    Listen 39:42
    Get ready now. Listen to our The Big Burn podcast
    Jacob Margolis, LAist's science reporter, examines the new normal of big fires in California.

    Fire resources and tips

    Check out LAist's wildfire recovery guide

    If you have to evacuate:

    Navigating fire conditions:

    How to help yourself and others:

    How to start the recovery process:

    What to do for your kids:

    Prepare for the next disaster: