Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Officers' less-lethal weapon usage examined
    A photo illustration features image snippets of police officers pointing weapons as well as text remarking on how pointing weapons at the heads of protesters is a violation.

    Topline:

    As California Highway Patrol officers in riot gear dispersed pro-Palestinian protests at UCLA on May 2, they regularly aimed or fired their less-lethal weapons at protesters in ways that appear to go against training guidelines or state law.

    The training: Law enforcement officers across the state are trained that these types of munitions “shall not be aimed at the head, neck or any other vital organs,” according to guidelines from California Commission on Peace of Officers and Standards Training. That's not what appeared to be followed.

    Read more ... to check out images and video of the CHP interactions with protesters.

    As California Highway Patrol officers in riot gear dispersed pro-Palestinian protests at UCLA on May 2, they regularly aimed or fired their less-lethal weapons at protesters in ways that appear to go against training guidelines or state law.

    Just before 4 o’clock on Thursday morning, three CHP Special Response Teams with batons formed a skirmish line outside Royce Hall at UCLA. Some officers behind and next to them carried shotguns loaded with beanbag rounds or 40mm launchers with sponge rounds, less-lethal munitions referred to as a “pain compliance device” by its manufacturer.

    A review of CalMatters video from inside the encampment documented at least 25 instances in which those officers appeared to aim their weapons at the eye level of protesters or fired them into crowds that didn’t appear to present an immediate threat to life or serious injury. In some instances, the officers approached kneeling protesters with the launchers aimed at point-blank range.

    Law enforcement officers across the state are trained that these types of munitions “shall not be aimed at the head, neck or any other vital organs,” according to guidelines from California Commission on Peace of Officers and Standards Training. “We do not train to point at people’s heads unless it’s a deadly force situation,” said Travis Norton, a retired police lieutenant who developed a course on the use of less-lethal weapons for the commission.

    The weapons could accidentally discharge and seriously harm protesters. The manufacturer of beanbag rounds, Combined Tactical Systems, warns that, “Shots to the head, neck, thorax, heart, or spine can result in death or serious injury.”

    In 2021, California outlawed the practice of shooting less-lethal munitions at people merely to disperse them, after their use caused serious injuries during demonstrations in the wake of George Floyd’s murder. The law restricts officers from using them except when there is a “threat to life or serious bodily injury.”

    In response to CalMatters’ questions, CHP Director of Communications Jamie Coffee said that officers did indeed face a threat from protesters. “When certain demonstrators in the unlawful assembly became assaultive and posed an immediate threat to officers by launching objects and weapons, some officers used kinetic specialty rounds to protect themselves, other officers, and members of the public,” she said.

    Protesters do not appear to attack or threaten the CHP officers in the videos recorded by CalMatters, including the same videos in which police are seen aiming or firing less-lethal munitions. No battery or assault charges have been announced against protesters.

    Under the law, CHP must post a report on the use of impact munitions online within 90 days. Unlike the Los Angeles police and sheriff’s departments, CHP does not widely use body cameras and officers from the special response teams did not appear to wear them during their raid of the UCLA encampment.

    Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office deferred questions to CHP. The agency didn’t directly respond to CalMatters’ request for evidence that protesters represented a serious threat to officers, but Coffee said CHP will open an investigation into the use of force at UCLA. “The use of force and any incident involving the use of a weapon by CHP personnel is a serious matter, and the CHP will conduct a fair and impartial investigation to ensure that actions were consistent with policy and the law. We welcome any videos and/or evidence that could assist in our evaluation efforts,” Coffee said.

    Former police officers with expertise in handling protests were troubled by some of the CHP officers’ behavior.

    Police officers are geared up on a college campus. One is masked and pointing and firing a weapon.
    (
    Sergio Olmos
    /
    CalMatters
    )

    Jeff Winneger, who oversaw investigations into officer-involved shootings and significant use of force incidents at the Los Angeles Police Department, said overall law enforcement handled the protests in a measured way, but said he was “shocked” by the actions of this masked officer, who fired a number of bean bag rounds in succession into a crowd.

    “He fired that single bean bag round, paused and fired another three rounds in rapid succession,” said Winnegar, who oversaw the policing of protesters at the 2000 Democratic National Convention in Los Angeles. “Bag rounds are meant for a single target, used for an individual engaged in a violent act, not indiscriminately into a crowd.”

    After reviewing the videos, Winneger said he didn’t see evidence of a threat to life or serious bodily injury, officers around the officer didn’t react like there was, and there was no apparent effort made to arrest anyone. What’s more, the officer in question was wearing a balaclava that concealed his face. “Those things need to stop,” he said.

    Norton said hiding your face is not standard procedure. He assumed there must be a legitimate reason since the officer’s supervisors were on site. “I don’t know why he’s wearing it,” he said. “We don’t wear a balaclava unless it’s freezing cold outside. It’s the perception. We have to maintain legitimacy with our communities.” CHP refused to explain why an officer was wearing a balaclava.

    The agency said it “has developed a well-structured Officer Safety and Civil Disturbance training program to ensure uniformed personnel are up to date with current mandates. This training is regularly evaluated and updated to incorporate new laws and regulations, techniques, and instructional methods.” According to the Commission on Peace of Officers and Standards Training database, CHP has not offered a civil disobedience training course in over 22 months, the furthest the database goes back.

    LAPD Police Chief Dominic Choi said there were no serious injuries from the clearing of the encampments, but at least one protestor was hospitalized with wounds from impact munitions fired by law enforcement, according to the LA Times.

    The student protesters had established the encampment on April 25. Law enforcement cleared it the night after pro-Israeli counterprotesters were allowed to attack pro-Palestinian protesters for hours without a police response.

    The raid on the encampment began at around 3:50 a.m. and lasted approximately an hour and a half. Here are some instances in which officers aimed or fired their launchers at protesters. (The incidents happened in crowded spaces; we’ve filtered the images to leave only the primary players in color to make the action easier to decipher.)

    4:42 a.m. – Two CHP officers aim 40mm launchers near the head of a woman wearing candy cane pajamas at point-blank range. The woman appears to be attempting to get her backpack.

    Two CHP officers aim 40mm launchers near the head of a woman wearing candy cane pajamas at point-blank range.
    (
    Sergio Olmos
    /
    CalMatters
    )

    3:56 a.m. – A CHP officer aims a shotgun with bean bag rounds at point-blank range near the heads of protesters who are kneeling and holding on to fencing.

    In this video image, a CHP officer aims a shotgun with bean bag rounds at point-blank range near the heads of protesters who are kneeling and holding on to fencing.
    (
    Sergio Olmos
    /
    CalMatters
    )

    3:56 a.m. – A CHP officer uses the barrel of a beanbag shotgun to repeatedly strike the hands of a kneeling protester trying to keep a section of wood fence upright.

    “We don’t train that,” Travis Norton said. “We don’t train to hit people in the hand with a less-lethal device. You could cause an accidental discharge. You don’t want to put yourself in a situation where somebody can grab it and now you’re in a fight for the weapon.”

    4:01 a.m. – A CHP officer aims a 40mm launcher at eye level of a crowd of protesters. Norton noted that the officers appeared to be using the weapons for their flashlight, something that’s problematic. If they needed visibility, they should’ve used a flashlight – not a weapon, he said. “If that is, in fact, what they were doing, then that’s a training issue that needs to be addressed,” he said. He said aiming at the head should be reserved only for “deadly force,” since the munitions can kill someone.

    A CHP officer holds up his weapon with a light attached toward a group of protesters.
    (
    Sergio Olmos
    /
    CalMatters
    )

    4:36 a.m. – A CHP officer aims a 40mm near the heads of protesters. Wenninger and Norton said that officers with less-lethal munitions are supposed to be watching for life safety issues behind a first line of officers known as the “skirmish line.” They’re not supposed to be the first line of contact with protesters – an officer with a baton should be.

    A geared-up CHP officers shines his weapon light on protesters.
    (
    Sergio Olmos
    /
    CalMatters
    )

    4:39 a.m. – A CHP officer fires an impact projectile from a 40mm launcher towards a crowd of protesters. Training guidelines specify that rounds should “minimize the possible incidental impact of their use of kinetic energy projectiles and chemical agents on bystanders, medical personnel, journalists or other unintended targets” and “ONLY if the use is objectively reasonable to defend against a threat to life or serious bodily injury to any individual.”

    A geared-up CHP officers fires his weapon, muzzle flare emanating from the barrel.
    (
    Sergio Olmos
    /
    CalMatters
    )

    3:56 a.m. – A CHP officer sweeps the barrel of a 40mm launcher at protesters’ eye level.

    Emerging through a tent, a CHP officer points a weapon and light at protesters.
    (
    Sergio Olmos
    /
    CalMatters
    )

    3:57 a.m. – A CHP officer appears to use his 40MM launcher as a flashlight, aiming it towards a cluster of protesters.

    At night, protesters are illuminated by the lights of the weapons pointed at them by CHP officers.
    (
    Sergio Olmos
    /
    CalMatters
    )

    3:56 a.m. – A CHP officer aims a 40mm launcher at the eye level of protesters.

    Light illuminate CHP officers facing protesters at night.
    (
    Sergio Olmos
    /
    CalMatters
    )

    You can watch all of CalMatters’ videos from the protests here.

    Police ultimately arrested 132 people at the encampment, where protesters were calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and demanding the University of California system divest from companies and institutions with financial ties to Israel. It was one of at least eight pro-Palestinian encampments in the UC system and approximately 180 nationwide, according to a directory of student encampments.

  • Astrophysicist Ray Jayawardhana to lead university
    Ray Jayawardhana, the incoming president of Caltech, speaking at a podium during an announcement ceremony at The Athenaeum in Pasadena. He is wearing a dark suit and patterned tie, standing in front of a large orange backdrop featuring the Caltech logo.
    Incoming Caltech president Ray Jayawardhana speaks during an announcement ceremony at Caltech in Pasadena on Tuesday.

    Topline:

    Caltech has selected astrophysicist and Johns Hopkins University provost Ray Jayawardhana as its next president.

    Who he is: According to his introduction video, Jayawardhana goes by "Ray Jay."

    His academic work in astronomy explores how planets and stars form, evolve and differ from each other. He's part of a team that works with the James Webb Space Telescope to observe and characterize so-called exoplanets — planets around other stars — with an eye toward the potential for life beyond Earth.

    In addition to his time as provost at Johns Hopkins, where he oversees the university's 10 schools, Jayawardhana has also taught at Cornell University, the University of Toronto and the University of Michigan and also had a research fellowship at the University of California, Berkeley. He got his undergraduate degree at Yale and earned his Ph.D. at Harvard.

    Why now: In April, current Caltech President Thomas F. Rosenbaum announced he'd retire after the 2025-26 academic year. Rosenbaum has led the university for the past 12 years.

    What's next: Jayawardhana will step into his new role July 1.

  • Sponsored message
  • Trump admin plans to halt billions to CA
    President Donald Trump speaks during a White House event to announce new tariffs April 2, 2025.

    Topline:

    The Trump administration says it’s planning to freeze about $10 billion in federal support for needy families in California and four other Democrat-run states, as the president announced an investigation into unspecified fraud in California.

    The backstory: The plans come on the heels of the Trump administration announcing a freeze on all federal payments for child care in Minnesota, citing fraud allegations against daycare centers in the state.

    The potential impact on California: The plans call for California, Minnesota, New York, Illinois and Colorado to lose about $7 billion in cash assistance for households with children, almost $2.4 billion to care for children of working parents, and about $870 million for social services grants that mostly benefit children at risk, according to unnamed federal officials speaking to the New York Times and New York Post.

    Read on ... for more on the fraud allegations and Gov. Gavin Newsom's response.

    The Trump administration says it’s planning to freeze about $10 billion in federal support for needy families in California and four other Democrat-run states, as the president announced an investigation into unspecified fraud in California.

    The plans come on the heels of the Trump administration announcing a freeze on all federal payments for child care in Minnesota, citing fraud allegations against daycare centers in the state.

    The state’s Democrat governor, Tim Walz — who ran for vice president against Donald Trump’s ticket in 2024 — announced Monday he was dropping out of running for reelection. He pointed to fraud against the state, saying it’s a real issue while alleging Trump and his allies were “seeking to take advantage of the crisis.”

    On Monday, the New York Post reported that the administration was expanding the funding freeze to include California and three other Democrat-led states, in addition to Minnesota. Unnamed federal officials cited “concerns that the benefits were fraudulently funneled to non-citizens,” The Post reported.

    Early Tuesday, President Trump alleged that corruption in California is worse than Minnesota and announced an investigation.

    “California, under Governor Gavin Newscum, is more corrupt than Minnesota, if that’s possible??? The Fraud Investigation of California has begun. Thank you for your attention to this matter! PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP,” the president wrote on his social media platform Truth Social.

    He did not specify what alleged fraud was being examined in the Golden State.

    LAist has reached out to the White House to ask what the president’s fraud concerns are in California and to request an interview with the president.

    “For too long, Democrat-led states and governors have been complicit in allowing massive amounts of fraud to occur under their watch,” said an emailed statement from Andrew Nixon, a spokesperson for U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which administers the federal childcare funds.

    “Under the Trump administration, we are ensuring that federal taxpayer dollars are being used for legitimate purposes. We will ensure these states are following the law and protecting hard-earned taxpayer money.”

    Gov. Gavin Newsom’s press office disputed Trump’s claim on social media, arguing that since taking office, the governor has blocked $125 billion in fraud and arrested “criminal parasites leaching off of taxpayers.”

    Criminal fraud cases in CA appear to be rare for this program

    Defrauding federally funded programs is a crime — and one LAist has investigated, leading to one of the largest such criminal cases in recent years against a California elected official, which surrounded meal funds.

    When it comes to the federal childcare funds that are being frozen, the dollar amount of fraud alleged in criminal cases appears to be a tiny fraction of the overall program’s spending in California.

    A search of thousands of news releases by all four federal prosecutor offices in California, going back more than a decade, found a total of one criminal case where the press releases referenced childcare benefits.

    That case, brought in 2023, alleged four men stole $3.7 million in federal childcare benefits through fraudulent requests to a San Diego organization that distributed the funds. All four pleaded guilty, with one defendant sentenced to 27 months in prison and others sentenced to other terms, according to authorities.

    It appears to be equivalent to one one-hundredth of 1% of all the childcare funding California has received over the past decade-plus covered by the prosecution press release search.

    Potential impact on California families

    The plans call for California, Minnesota, New York, Illinois and Colorado to lose about $7 billion in cash assistance for households with children, almost $2.4 billion to care for children of working parents, and about $870 million for social services grants that mostly benefit children at risk, according to unnamed federal officials speaking to the New York Times and New York Post.

    In the largest category of funding, California receives $3.7 billion per year. The program is known as Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, or TANF.

     ”It's very clear that a freeze of those funds would be very damaging to the children, families, and providers of California,” said Stacy Lee, who oversees early childhood initiatives "at Children Now, an advocacy group for children in California.

     ”It is a significant portion of our funds and will impact families and children and providers across the whole state,” she added. “It would be devastating, in no uncertain terms.”

    About 270,000 people are served by the TANF program in L.A. County — about 200,000 of whom are children, according to the county Department of Public Social Services.

    “Any pause in funding for their cash benefits – which average $1000/month - would be devastating to these families,” said DPSS chief of staff Nick Ippolito.

    Ippolito said the department has a robust fraud prevention and 170-person investigations team, and takes allegations “very seriously.”

    It remains to be seen whether the funding freeze will end up in court. The state, as well as major cities and counties in California, has sued to ask judges to halt funding freezes or new requirements placed by the Trump administration. L.A. city officials say they’ve had success with that, including shielding more than $600 million in federal grant funding to the city last year.

    A union representing California childcare workers said the funding freeze would harm low-income families.

    “These threats need to be called out for what they are: direct threats on working families of all backgrounds who rely on access to quality, affordable child care in their communities to go to work every day supporting, and growing our economy,” said Max Arias, chairperson for the Child Care Providers United, which says it represents more than 70,000 child care workers across the state who care for kids in their homes.

    “Funding freezes, even when intended to be temporary, will be devastating — resulting in families losing access to care and working parents facing the devastating choice of keeping their children safe or paying their bills.”

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is ngerda.47.

    Federal officials planned to send letters to the affected states Monday about the planned funding pauses, the New York Post reported. As of 3 p.m. Tuesday, state officials said they haven’t gotten any official notification of the funding freeze plans.

    “The California Department of Social Services administers child care programs that help working families afford safe, reliable care for their children — so parents can go to work, support their families, and contribute to their communities,” said a statement from California Department of Social Services spokesperson Jason Montiel.

    “These funds are critical for working families across California. We take fraud seriously, and CDSS has received no information from the federal government indicating any freeze, pause, or suspension of federal child care funding.”

  • CA is investing in housing for fire survivors
    The charred remains of what used to be the interior of a home, with a stone fireplace sticking out from the rubble.
    A home destroyed in the Eaton Fire on Jan. 8.

    Topline:

    California is investing $107.3 million in affordable housing in L.A. County to help fire survivors and target the region’s housing crisis.

    What we know: In an announcement Tuesday, the state said the money will fund nine projects with 673 new affordable rental homes specifically for communities impacted by the January fires.

    Where will these projects go? The homes will not replace destroyed ones or be built on burn scar areas, according to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office. The idea is to build in cities like Claremont, Covina, Santa Monica and Pasadena to create multiple affordable housing communities across the county.

    Officials say: “We are rebuilding stronger, fairer communities in Los Angeles without displacing the people who call these neighborhoods home,” Newsom said in a statement. “More affordable homes across the county means survivors can stay near their schools, jobs and support systems, and all Angelenos are better able to afford housing in these vibrant communities.”

    Dig deeper into how Los Angeles is remembering the anniversary of the fires.

  • Thousands could be unhoused as fed funds run out
    A “now leasing” sign advertises apartment for rent in L.A.’s Sawtelle neighborhood.
    A “now leasing” sign advertises apartment for rent in L.A.’s Sawtelle neighborhood.

    Topline:

    Housing officials in the city of Los Angeles say a pandemic-era voucher program is set to run out of money later this year, putting thousands of renters at risk of homelessness.

    The program: The federal Emergency Housing Voucher program was launched in 2021 as a way to get vulnerable people off the streets and into housing during the COVID-19 crisis. The city of L.A. received more than 3,300 of these vouchers.

    The numbers: With federal funding now running out, the city is preparing to wind down the program. On Monday, the city’s housing authority said it had told 2,760 tenant households and 1,700 landlords that unless new funding is found, vouchers will expire by November or December of this year.

    Read on … to learn more about the families using these vouchers, and how tenant advocates are responding to the expiration.

    Housing officials in the city of Los Angeles say a pandemic-era voucher program is set to run out of money later this year, putting thousands of renters at risk of homelessness.

    The federal Emergency Housing Voucher program was launched in 2021 as a way to get vulnerable people off the streets and into housing during the COVID-19 crisis. The city of L.A. received more than 3,300 of the vouchers.

    With federal funding now running out, the city is preparing to wind down the program. On Monday the city’s housing authority said it had told 2,760 tenant households and 1,700 landlords that unless new funding is found, vouchers will expire by November or December of this year.

    “We are providing this notice nearly a year in advance because our families deserve the respect of time to prepare, but this is not a notice of resignation,” said L.A. Housing Authority President Lourdes Castro Ramírez said in a news release. “We are exhausting every avenue — at the local, state and federal levels — to bridge this funding gap.”

    The Housing Authority said each household using a voucher had an average of 1.58 members. That puts more than 4,000 Angelenos at risk of losing their housing later this year.

    Homelessness progress could be reversed

    Congress originally intended the program to continue through 2030, but last year, the Trump administration announced funding would end sooner. The program’s demise risks reversing L.A.’s reported progress at stemming the rise of homelessness.

    After years of steady increases, the city has registered slight reductions in the number of people experiencing homelessness for the past two years. In 2023, the region’s homeless services authority reported 46,260 people experiencing homelessness in the city of L.A. By 2025, that number had fallen to 43,695.

    The accuracy of those official counts has been questioned by local researchers, but elected officials have cheered the numbers as a sign that the tide is turning in addressing one of L.A.’s most vexing problems.

    With thousands of renters now at risk of losing a key resource helping them afford the city’s high rents, sharp increases in homelessness could be on the horizon, said Mike Feuer, a senior policy advisor with the Inner City Law Center.

    “They're going to fall into homelessness, and they're going to increase L.A.'s homeless population by almost 10%,” Feuer said. “Those are the implications of what the Trump administration is doing.”

    Voucher holders have low incomes; many have kids

    According to L.A.’s Housing Authority, about 1-in-4 voucher holders has children and 1-in-5 is elderly. And about 40% are disabled. These households have an average income of less than $14,000 per year, and they receive an average of $1,789 per month in rental subsidy while paying about $350 out of their own pockets.

    The loss of federal funding for Emergency Housing Vouchers is distinct from the issues facing renters using Housing Choice Vouchers, another federally funded program often referred to as Section 8. Existing vouchers in the Section 8 program have continued to be funded, but federal funding reductions have caused city officials to cut the amount of rent new vouchers in that program can cover by 10%.

    L.A. Housing Authority officials said they have dedicated staff reaching out to tenants to explore other housing resources that might keep them housed after the vouchers expire.

    Manuel Villagomez, an attorney with the Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles specializing in subsidized housing, said with city and state budgets strapped, tenant advocates are not counting on California to find alternative funding sources to continue the program.

    “It seems like it's a tragedy in the making,” Villagomez said. “We're preparing for the worst.”