Your sustaining gift is matched 3X today!

Make a monthly gift during our June member drive to power our local newsroom.
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Inside LA's roving art exhibition — on a bus
    The exterior of a Metro bus covered with a colorful collage of portraits in different art styles.
    The Metro Art Buses have been driving around Los Angeles since 2022. It's understandable if you've missed them, though, since there are only four of them.

    Topline:

    The Metro Art Buses, which feature dozens of portraits of Metro riders, have been in operation on routes across L.A. County since 2022.

    How to find them: The Metro Art Buses don’t follow a fixed route, so it's up to chance if you'll see one in the wild. If you want to see them in a fixed location, Metro also brings the buses out for special events, like CicLAvia.

    The backstory: The idea for the buses originated during the pandemic, with three buses launching in 2022 and another one being added in 2023.

    See the portraits on the Metro Art Bus: ...by checking out Metro's "Somos/We Are" series here.

    One of the joys of living in Los Angeles is that you can find performances and art exhibits just about everywhere, from public murals around town to improvised concerts along the L.A. River.

    In that spirit, Metro’s Art Bus brings dozens of portraits to regular bus routes across L.A. County – and if you’re lucky, it might even be coming to your local route.

    The artwork

    When you’re about to board a Metro Art Bus, maybe you’ll see those very words in big lettering on the side windows, or maybe you’ll notice the portraits lining either side of the vehicle. Either way, you can tell right away that this isn’t a normal bus – after all, it has a wraparound on the outside that isn’t trying to sell you something.

    Listen 4:32
    Inside LA’s roaming public art exhibit, the Metro Art Bus

    But the art exhibit isn’t just on the outside — you’ll also find dozens of portraits inside where the ads would normally be. As long as the bus isn’t full to the brim and you don’t mind giving up your seat, you can walk around and see the different portraits.

    The portraits also feature lots of different kinds of transportation, even including air travel. One such portrait is “Traveler” by the Colombian-American artist Carolyn Castaño. The work is a collage that incorporates signs many people might recognize from LAX alongside flowers and plants from Colombia and California, where Castaño lives now.

    Four portraits in different styles are pictured along the top of a Metro bus. The artists credited are Daniel Barajas, Simonette David Jackson, Moses X. Ball, and Carolyn Castaño.
    Carolyn Castaño's "Traveler," pictured right, pays tribute to L.A.'s international roots by incorporating flowers from Colombia and California into the work, along with an image of signage at LAX.
    (
    Courtesy Metro Art (Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority)
    )

    Other portraits on the Metro Bus have different kinds of personal backstories woven in: The artist Edwin Ushiro’s “Better Together” is a portrait of him with his wife on a Metro bus. According to Zeller, that’s because the couple regularly took Metro to see each other when they started dating.

    “He said that Metro was actually the lifeblood of their relationship, which is a really beautiful sentiment,” Zeller said. “We didn't put him up to saying that, but he said it really made a difference for them to be able to connect with one another.”

    A man wearing a Metro operator uniform poses near the rear exit of the bus. To his right, an artwork depicting two people smiling and looking directly ahead. To his left on the exterior of the bus, an image of an older woman staring into the middle distance.
    Edwin Ushiro's work "Better Together" is pictured directly to the left of the bus operator posing. The work depicts the artist and his wife, who regularly used Metro to meet with each other when they were dating.
    (
    Courtesy Metro Art (Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority)
    )

    How to spot the buses

    As with so many aspects of life in Los Angeles, from housing lotteries to jury duty, finding a Metro Art Bus is a matter of pure luck. There are four Metro Art Buses, but none of them follow fixed routes, and the lines they service change from day to day.

    “They're all based out of different bus divisions in different parts of the county,” Zeller said. “They travel all over the place, so you will hopefully see them in different places.”

    Zeller told LAist that Metro doesn’t currently have a tracking tool to tell riders where the art buses are, so the best way to increase your chances of seeing one in the wild is to go out and ride more buses.

    “Think of it as a surprise,” Zeller said. “It'll just surprise you one day when you least expect it, if you're walking down the street or if you are waiting for your bus, and then lo and behold, that's the bus that picks you up.”

    The only surefire way to spot them is to go to an event like CicLAvia where Metro brings them out. If you see one while it’s parked, you’ll have the added bonus of being able to pose for photos in the driver's seat.

    How it came to be

    The Metro Art Buses have been in operation since 2022, though since there are only four of them out of nearly 2,000 Metro buses overall, it’s understandable if you haven’t run into one in the wild yet.

    Much of Metro Art’s offerings focus on train stations, but the majority of Metro’s riders take buses — about 75%, according to the agency’s data, and this project brings Metro’s art to these passengers.

    Once Metro took on the project, Zeller said that it was only a matter of determining which portraits to include and figuring out how to superimpose them on the bus wraparound – especially since physical features like the bus windows limited the amount of exhibition space on the outside.

    And with this project, Metro hopes it can bring public transportation and public art even closer together.

    “It's for our riders. It's about our riders,” Zeller said. “It's for the person walking down the street, or even for people driving cars. It really is for everybody.”

    To view all the portraits featured on the Metro Art Bus, see here.

  • Who will face Bass in November?
    Three people seen on a television screen behind lecterns
    Spencer Pratt, Karen Bass and Nithya Raman take part in the Los Angeles Mayoral debate at Skirball Cultural Center on May 6.

    Topline:

    Early trends show Los Angeles City Councilmember Nithya Raman making slight gains on reality TV personality Spencer Pratt in the race to face incumbent mayor Karen Bass in November.

    The count: By Tuesday night, Pratt had collected enough votes to put him squarely in the second spot, with a substantial lead over Raman.

    But by late Wednesday, Raman had gone from just over 20% of the vote on election night to a little over 22% in the latest tally. Pratt gained about a tenth of a percentage point to about 30%.

    Hundreds of thousands of votes remain to be counted, according to the county registrar.

    Is Raman still in it?: “I think she has a shot at catching Pratt but I think it's a long shot,” said Zev Yaroslavsky, director of the Los Angeles Initiative at the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs. “It requires her to get a large percentage of the votes that remain to be counted.”

    Go deeper... read on for more on the race.

    The race is on for second place in the Los Angeles mayor's contest.

    Early trends show L.A. City Councilmember Nithya Raman making slight gains on reality TV personality Spencer Pratt in the race to face incumbent Karen Bass in November.

    The Associated Press has already declared Bass as having secured one spot in the runoff.

    Votes are still being counted, and the L.A. County Registrar of Voters will receive ballots postmarked by Election Day up until seven days later. Hundreds of thousands of votes remain to be counted, according to the registrar.

    By Tuesday night, Pratt had collected enough votes to put him squarely in the second spot, with a substantial lead over Raman.

    But by late Wednesday, Raman had gone from just over 20% of the vote on election night to a little over 22% in the latest tally. Pratt gained about a tenth of a percentage point to about 30%.

    “I think she has a shot at catching Pratt but I think it's a long shot,” said Zev Yaroslavsky, director of the Los Angeles Initiative at the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs. “It requires her to get a large percentage of the votes that remain to be counted.”

    Yaroslavsky noted progressives tended to vote late and those votes have yet to be counted. Raman is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America and can be expected to pick up a lot of those votes.

    “The later votes tend to be more Democratic and more progressive and that inures to her benefit,” Yaroslavsky said.

    The problem for Raman is that two days ago she was about 40,000 votes behind Pratt and last night was about 38,000 votes behind Pratt, he said.

    Raman needs to gain much more than 2,000 votes a day to eclipse the 38,000 vote deficit, according to Yaroslavsky.

    “She really has to get the preponderance of the votes that will be coming in in the next week or so,” he said.

  • Sponsored message
  • DHHS seeks access for clues on autism and vaccines
    A man wearing a dark suit and eyeglasses, stands at a podium, speaking into a microphone. Behind him are fround flags including an American flag. To his right is a television screen displaying a graph with blue and purple bars.
    Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. speaks during a news conference on April 16, 2025, to discuss the rise of autism diagnoses.

    Topline:

    U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is pursuing federal government access to most Americans’ medical records, in a quest to research a link between vaccines and autism — a connection the medical establishment studied for decades and flatly rejects.

    Collecting personal data: The Department of Health and Human Services is seeking data from little-known state systems that allow hospitals and clinics to exchange detailed, identifiable patient information, KFF Health News has learned. Kennedy told KFF Health News that medical records are key to investigating the cause of autism, vaccine safety, and chronic diseases. Kennedy faced blowback last year when he proposed compiling the medical records of people with autism to create a federal disease registry — which health department officials later disputed was underway.

    Why it maters: In private meetings, some public health leaders have objected to giving Kennedy’s team access to such data, raising doubts that it’s legal or that the information would even be useful. They have also expressed concerns about allowing the federal government to peer into the minutiae of Americans’ medical records, which could mean viewing anything from doctors’ notes to prescription history. HHS has offered no insight into how it will protect or handle the personal health information it obtains.

    U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is pursuing federal government access to most Americans’ medical records, in a quest to research a link between vaccines and autism — a connection the medical establishment studied for decades and flatly rejects.

    The Department of Health and Human Services is seeking data from little-known state systems that allow hospitals and clinics to exchange detailed, identifiable patient information, KFF Health News has learned.

    In private meetings, some public health leaders have objected to giving Kennedy’s team access to such data, raising doubts that it’s legal or that the information would even be useful.

    They have also expressed concerns about allowing the federal government to peer into the minutiae of Americans’ medical records, which could mean viewing anything from doctors’ notes to prescription history. HHS has offered no insight into how it will protect or handle the personal health information it obtains.

    But Kennedy told KFF Health News that medical records are key to investigating the cause of autism, vaccine safety, and chronic diseases. And millions of dollars in grant money has poured into a Nebraska nonprofit that has assisted Kennedy’s effort, according to state records.

    He and his advisers have been frustrated that federal access to Americans’ medical records has been limited.

    “We need a good health record system, and one of the things that really surprised me most when I came into office is that there is — that the systems are broken,” Kennedy said in a May interview. “We’ve had to go to the states and, luckily, we’ve got a lot of cooperation from the states, but we now have databases together that we can actually do the studies on. Those studies are in motion.”

    HHS has not publicly announced any new projects involving medical records and autism or vaccine research. Kennedy faced blowback last year when he proposed compiling the medical records of people with autism to create a federal disease registry — which health department officials later disputed was underway.

    But Kennedy said in May, “We have a whole pipeline of studies that will be done over the next year.”

    Though the White House has steered Kennedy away from further changes to U.S. vaccine policy ahead of November’s crucial midterm elections, President Donald Trump has regularly echoed Kennedy’s doubts about vaccine safety and last week signed an executive order calling for the U.S. to reduce the number of vaccines recommended for children.

    Kennedy’s political appointees and allies — including William “Reyn” Archer III, a former Texas health official and vaccine critic whom Kennedy hired as a senior adviser — have led the initiative for the health department to collect and examine medical records.

    Federal officials met with leaders of the state-run health information exchange systems several times over the past year and asked how the personal medical records they maintain could be used for vaccine research, according to seven people who participated in the discussions or were familiar with them.

    Craig Behm, who runs the Maryland health information exchange, said Kennedy’s team asked about how the vast trove of medical records they store from hospitals and health systems could be used to study vaccines.

    “If this administration wants to conduct research on the effectiveness of vaccines, are you saying you all can help us conduct that research?” Behm recalled being asked by a top official at HHS’ health information technology office.

    Last June, Behm and leaders of other state exchanges met with Kennedy’s top advisers to discuss sharing more medical data with federal agencies. The state organizations followed up with a pitch in October for a new surveillance system that would give the federal health department “real-time, 24-hour data feeds on opioid and chronic disease trends” within a year, according to a presentation reviewed by KFF Health News. Under the proposal, HHS would get data from 90% of the population’s medical records by 2028.

    Administration officials regularly asked during the meetings how the records could be used to monitor vaccine safety. Kennedy has rejected the federal government’s current vaccine-monitoring systems; decades of research has shown immunizations are safe and effective for most people.

    “Vaccine safety, or whatever words you want to use, has come up pretty consistently in those conversations,” said John Kansky, CEO of the Indiana Health Information Exchange.

    Kansky sees the potential value of sharing information from the exchanges for public health but is worried about the focus on vaccines: “It’s like, oh man, I wish you would have picked something that pushed fewer buttons for people.”

    A system to monitor chronic disease

    Nearly every state has at least one health information exchange — often regulated by state laws and run by private companies or nonprofits — that enables hospitals and health systems to immediately share patients’ medical records with one another. The systems allow doctors and nurses to quickly pull up nearly anyone’s medical history and records at emergency rooms or share after-visit summaries and notes with patients’ primary care providers, for example.

    In certain circumstances — most often dealing with cases of infectious diseases such as measles or flu — the exchanges notify public health authorities, like the state health department or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Using the exchanges for broader public health purposes is not an unusual idea in itself. But it can present privacy, legal, and ethical complications, health officials say.

    In the end, Behm said his organization in Maryland declined to share more data with the federal government for vaccine research, noting that sharing medical records for that purpose would require a rash of approvals from hospitals, state political leaders, and research boards. Any new data-sharing agreement should also have a clear, detailed framework outlining what would be shared and with whom, he added.

    “A number of us said, ‘We can’t do anything our agreements don’t allow us to do, so no,’” Behm said. Indeed, most health information exchanges have contractual restrictions on who can access clinical data.

    Kansky said Indiana is still weighing whether to provide additional data for Kennedy’s project, and that nothing has yet been shared.

    HHS spokesperson Emily Hilliard did not answer questions about how many states are participating in Kennedy’s project, what new data the agency is collecting, how much the federal government is spending on the initiative, how it is protecting patient privacy, or who has access to the data.

    “HHS is strengthening public health surveillance and modernizing data systems to better understand and combat the childhood chronic disease epidemic as part of Secretary Kennedy’s Make America Healthy Again agenda,” Hilliard said in an emailed statement. “Americans deserve robust systems to monitor the drivers of chronic illness.”

    Kennedy has asserted, without evidence, that vaccines can cause chronic illness.

    A Kennedy partner in Nebraska

    At least one state has been cooperative.

    The former leader of Nebraska’s state health information exchange has led the effort to share data from medical records with the federal government.

    Jaime Bland, former CEO of CyncHealth — the Nebraska health information exchange used by most hospitals and health systems in the state — said several states are looking to “open up channels” to provide more analysis to Kennedy’s team.

    “They’re looking at the data differently and providing some insights back to the CDC,” Bland told KFF Health News.

    Bland was among a group who proposed that CyncHealth would help kick off the initiative, according to a 43-slide PowerPoint presented to federal officials during an October meeting.

    CyncHealth and other state health information exchanges would “ingest data from hospitals, clinics, laboratories, pharmacies, payers, and social services agencies,” then “link claims and clinical records through a master patient index.”

    Data from the exchanges “will be deidentified where appropriate,” according to one slide.

    The federal government would pay the exchanges for furnishing the records, according to the proposal: $3 a person, annually.

    Officials would “frame publicly that this is not a new database, but a federated trust model that delivers real-time data for all HHS missions,” the presentation reads.

    After the meeting, Nebraska’s health department was awarded a large grant from the CDC, and CyncHealth in turn got millions of dollars from the state.

    On Dec. 19, the CDC announced new funding under its Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity program, which sends money to state and local health departments for lab work, health information enhancements, and solutions for outbreaks.

    Nebraska’s state health department was awarded $18.7 million — the most of any state last year, though Nebraska is the 38th most populous state. By comparison, Texas received $9.2 million, and California got $10.8 million.

    CyncHealth was then awarded three contracts totaling $13.6 million from the state health department just weeks later, on Jan. 9 and Jan. 16, according to a publicly accessible database of state contracts.

    Grace McNamara, a spokesperson for CyncHealth, said it retained $2.4 million of the funding for Kennedy’s project; the remaining money was distributed to “other participating states and various vendor organizations for implementation support.”

    A former CDC official who was aware of the transaction, but not authorized to speak publicly about it, confirmed the money was intended for CyncHealth to supply data for Kennedy’s initiative to look at vaccines and autism. McNamara said that the “work is focused on improving outcomes related to acute and chronic illnesses.”

    “The referenced project is not research, but rather a proof-of-concept project on how health information exchange and public health can work together to improve health outcomes and is not specific to autism,” she said in an emailed statement.

    McNamara did not answer questions about what type of medical data is being provided to the federal health department or whether patients’ identifying information is removed.

    Bland left her post at CyncHealth — where she was paid nearly $420,000 a year — in December. She was named in April as the chief data strategist for the MAHA Institute — a think tank founded by allies of Kennedy and Trump to advance their Make America Healthy Again movement.

    Bland agreed with Kennedy that data from state health information exchanges could provide more insight into autism’s causes or vaccine injuries.

    "The data is so fragmented, so modeled when it comes to population health and public health, that we lose sight of the individual stories,” Bland said. She told a story she had heard about a woman who had a seizure after receiving the HPV vaccine.

    “You know, the vaccine is safe — it absolutely is — but it wasn’t safe for her,” Bland said. “As public health officials, we say the vaccine is safe. But there are cases where it is not.”

    Daniel Jernigan, a former top CDC official who left the agency last summer, said he tried to point Kennedy to data that would help the health secretary study vaccine safety and autism.

    After 31 years at the CDC overseeing public health surveillance, emerging infectious diseases, and the influenza divisions, Jernigan thought the solution was simple. The secretary could work with researchers to obtain huge databases pulled from health systems nationwide and maintained by major electronic health records companies.

    Those databases are deidentified, meaning they don’t include patient names or other information that can identify individuals. Jernigan said Kennedy didn’t seem interested.

    Instead, as The New York Times first reported, the health secretary dispatched two top advisers — Archer and Hannah Anderson, his former deputy chief of staff — to the CDC’s headquarters in Atlanta last July to download millions of identifiable patient records directly from the Vaccine Safety Datalink, the system the health agency uses to investigate complications from vaccines. The records, though, were decades old.

    Jernigan said the federal government has limited legal authority to access medical records from state health information exchanges. In any case, examining those records may provide a view of a person’s medical history that will not necessarily produce answers to Kennedy’s questions about vaccines and autism.

    “If they’re just using the electronic health record data, there are limits to that,” Jernigan said. “If they’re only looking at electronic health record data, all you’re going to get is what was captured in the encounter. It’s not going to be very satisfying.”

    KFF Health News data reporter Maia Rosenfeld contributed to this article.

    KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

    This article first appeared on KFF Health News and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

    KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

  • LA man's death sentence reversed under 2020 act
    The silhouettes of people are seen against a multi-story stone and brick building in the background.
    The California Supreme Court building in San Francisco.

    Topline:

    The California Supreme Court this week reversed the death sentence of Anthony Bankston , a Los Angeles Bloods gang member convicted of killing a rival Crip in the early 1990s because a prosecutor compared him to a dangerous animal, the first time a death sentence has been overturned under the 2020 Racial Justice Act.

    The backstory: Bankston represented himself in court in 1991. A jury found him guilty. During the penalty phase of the trial, a prosecutor compared Bankston — appearing in a suit and tie — to a Bengal tiger at the zoo. The prosecutor’s story was that a journalist observed a Bengal tiger in a zoo, and was told by a hunter “that’s not a Bengal tiger.” The story was supposed to illustrate that Bankston in court was not the same person as Bankston on the street, whom the prosecutor described as “a killing machine.”

    2020 Racial Justice Act: In 2020, the California Legislature passed the Racial Justice Act, which included a prohibition on certain animal images that pose a risk of appealing to racial bias. The law itself specifically mentions the Bengal tiger example. The California Supreme Court justices found that the prosecutor's comparison prejudicial in a unanimous ruling with two concurrences. They reversed Bankston’s death sentence but the murder conviction still stands, meaning the high court sent Bankston’s sentencing back down to a trial court.

    The California Supreme Court this week reversed the death sentence of a Los Angeles Bloods gang member convicted of killing a rival Crip in the early 1990s because a prosecutor compared him to a dangerous animal, the first time a death sentence has been overturned under the 2020 Racial Justice Act.

    Anthony Bankston represented himself in court in 1991. A jury found him guilty. During the penalty phase of the trial, a prosecutor compared Bankston — appearing in a suit and tie — to a Bengal tiger at the zoo.

    The prosecutor’s story was that a journalist observed a Bengal tiger in a zoo, and was told by a hunter “that’s not a Bengal tiger.” Instead, the journalist traveled to India, where he found a tiger, “all flexed out, he sees the claws out, he sees the fangs, . . . he hears the growl.”

    The hunter tells him, “now you see a Bengal tiger.” The story was supposed to illustrate that Bankston in court was not the same person as Bankston on the street, whom the prosecutor described as “a killing machine.”

    The California Supreme Court justices found that comparison prejudicial in a unanimous ruling with two concurrences. They reversed Bankston’s death sentence but the murder conviction still stands, meaning the high court sent Bankston’s sentencing back down to a trial court.

    It was one of four decisions the high court released this week that stemmed from claims under the Racial Justice Act, which allows prisoners to appeal their convictions if they believe racial bias tainted their trials.

    The court upheld death sentences for two of the men: Alex Demolle, who was convicted of raping and murdering an 11-year-old girl; and Marcos Esquivel Barrera, who was sentenced to death after being convicted of murdering two of his children.

    In the fourth case, the court modified rulings against two condemned prisoners of Southeast Asian descent, but not because of their Racial Justice Act claims.

    A spokesperson for the Judicial Council of California confirmed that Bankston’s case was the first reversal of a death sentence by the California Supreme Court because of violations of the Racial Justice Act.

    According to the ruling in Bankston’s appeal, the Bengal tiger parable has come up several times in different cases, so much so that the high court called it a “well worn tale.”

    In a 2010 case, the high court found that the Bengal tiger metaphor was not a prejudicial statement about a defendant’s Vietnamese heritage. In a 2018 case, a defendant said the Bengal tiger story was used to “dehumanize” him, an argument the California Supreme Court justices rejected.

    But in 2020, the Legislature passed the Racial Justice Act, which included a prohibition on certain animal images that pose a risk of appealing to racial bias. The law itself specifically mentions the Bengal tiger example.

    “In light of the passage of the RJA, we now make clear that, whatever the intent behind telling the story may be, the Bengal tiger story should no longer be told in California courtrooms,” Justice Leondra Kruger wrote for the majority. “There is no reason to permit prosecutors to continue running the risk of appealing to biases that undermine the very foundation of a system of equal justice, simply to make an unremarkable point about a defendant’s behavior outside a controlled courtroom setting.”

    Comparisons of defendants to animals do not automatically qualify as violations of the Racial Justice Act. A case in the 4th District Court of Appeals this year found that comparing a defendant to a dog left in a car with a Slurpee was a fair comparison point to the notion of circumstantial evidence.

    The Bankston ruling similarly noted that references like “eager beaver,” “happy as a clam,” “free as a bird,” or “quiet as a mouse” would not rise to the level of Racial Justice Act violations.

    Bankston, who is Black, was convicted of two first-degree murder charges and one count of attempted murder for separate shootings in 1991. He was convicted of shooting and killing Benson Jones and attempting to murder Benson’s brother, Benjamin.

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

  • Voting begins to authorize a strike
    Four women hold up a black tarp sign and wear red shirts. Some are holding inflatable soccer balls. The woman in the center is holding a picket sign that reads "Kick ICE Out! Unite Here! Local 11". Letters behind them read "SoFi Stadium"
    Sofi Stadium workers, including cooks, bartenders, dishwashers, servers and cashiers, protest outside the stadium, ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup in Inglewood on May 18, 2026.

    Topline:

    Workers at SoFi Stadium begin voting today on whether to authorize a strike, just days before the World Cup launches in Los Angeles.

    Why it matters: Some 2,000 unionized food and beverage workers at the stadium have been threatening to walk off the job for weeks over concerns about Immigrations and Customs Enforcement's role in tournament security and other demands, including premium pay for lucrative events like the World Cup. But they've yet to strike a deal with Legends Global, the company that runs the stadium's bars and food services.

    The backstory: The contract between Legends and its workers expired last year, and the two sides are currently negotiating a new agreement. The union has been leveraging its role in the coming World Cup to push for higher wages, especially at mega-events like the World Cup that rake in major profits. Unite Here and Legends were at the bargaining table Wednesday, but Petersen said that they still hadn't made a deal.

    What's next: The two sides are scheduled to return to the bargaining table on Monday.

    Read on... about the ongoing dispute.

    Workers at SoFi Stadium started voting Thursday on whether to authorize a strike, just days before the World Cup launches in Los Angeles.

    Some 2,000 unionized food and beverage workers at the stadium have been threatening to walk off the job for weeks over concerns about Immigrations and Customs Enforcement's role in tournament security and other demands, including premium pay for lucrative events like the World Cup.

    But they've yet to strike a deal with Legends Global, the company that runs the stadium's bars and food services.

    " I think the combination of the World Cup being unable to get their stuff together and the greediness of the stadium owners may end up leading to workers having to call for a strike," said Kurt Petersen, co-president of the union representing SoFi workers, Unite Here Local 11.

    The contract between Legends and its workers expired last year, and the two sides are currently negotiating a new agreement. The union has been leveraging its role in the coming World Cup to push for higher wages, especially at mega-events like the World Cup that rake in major profits. Unite Here and Legends were at the bargaining table Wednesday, but Petersen said that they still hadn't made a deal.

    Workers are also concerned that FIFA's plans for its luxury suites will lock them out of lucrative jobs during the tournament. FIFA has brought in a company called On Location to offer exclusive packages that can cost tens of thousands of dollars or more. Union workers at SoFi say they're worried that those jobs will go to subcontractors without union protections.

    Petersen said that workers represented by his union still don't have their schedules for the World Cup, and that the union doesn't have details on the company's agreement with On Location.

    " It is kind of a mess," Petersen said. "Which is also adding fuel to people's anger. Like, really? We have this massive event coming, you want us to work super hard and you can't even tell us what we're gonna be doing when we're coming in, what our schedules are?"

    Legends Global did not return a request for comment.

    SoFi workers have also been pushing for protections from ICE, which will play a "key role" in tournament security, according to the former head of the agency.

    Multiple officials including L.A. County Sheriff Robert Luna have said they've received assurances that federal agents won't be conducting immigration enforcement, but Luna said there are no guarantees. Petersen said workers want the option to walk off the job if they feel unsafe because of ICE's presence.

    Unite Here filed an unfair labor practice charge with the National Labor Relations Board in April, saying ICE's planned presence at the World Cup threatened the union's ability to collectively bargain. The union has also asked California Attorney General Rob Bonta to investigate FIFA's accreditation process for stadium workers, which requires Social Security numbers and other personal information.

    FIFA responded in a statement saying that data would be deleted after the fact, and the accreditation process does "not constitute pre-employment checks."

    The sporting body did not respond to a request for comment on how a strike at SoFi Stadium could potentially affect the eight matches in Los Angeles.

    The results of Unite Here's strike authorization vote could be out as early as Friday evening. If workers vote yes, fans who attend the first U.S. match in Inglewood on June 12 could show up to a picket line.

    The two sides are scheduled to return to the bargaining table on Monday.