Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
COVID-19 Lockdown: LA Nursing Home Residents Risk Eviction If They Break The Rules

Our news is free on LAist. To make sure you get our coverage: Sign up for our daily coronavirus newsletter. To support our nonprofit public service journalism: Donate now.
Under near constant video surveillance, she'll only talk on her cell phone when she's sure no one can overhear. She eats her meals alone and spends most of her time in her room. She feels like she's in prison, not a nursing home.
"In the beginning, all of the measures were supposed to be to help seniors," said the woman, whom we'll call Lucy. "And yet, we were basically locked away and they threw away the key. It's like we don't even exist."
It has been more than five months since nursing homes locked down to try to protect their highly-vulnerable patients. But even with strict rules in place, more than 2,000 of L.A. County's nursing home residents have died from COVID-19 since March.
Most of the county's nursing homes have yet to reopen to visitors. Those new rules meant to keep out infection have also kept residents confined and isolated from their families and friends.
That's taken a toll on people like Lucy, who spoke to us on condition that we not use her real name because she fears retribution from administrators. She reached out to us after reading our coverage of nursing homes.
We spoke with other nursing home residents who described conditions similar to Lucy's, but they refused to speak publicly, terrified that they would be punished by staff or management.
The isolation has taken a mental and physical toll. Dozens of complaints are filed with county officials every week by nursing home residents desperate to leave their confined quarters but who fear even a walk outside could lead to eviction and homelessness.
DOOR CODES CHANGE TO KEEP RESIDENTS FROM RETURNING
Before the coronavirus, Lucy would sign out and leave the L.A. nursing home she's lived at for two years to get her hair cut or go to the grocery store. That changed in March when the pandemic hit.
"There was never like a general announcement, it was just suddenly, we're not allowed out," she said, adding the door codes were changed, making it impossible to let yourself back in.
Lucy hasn't left the facility since it was locked down in mid-March. The only outdoor access she has is a small employee parking lot encircled by a locked fence. She's been told if she so much as walks around the block for some fresh air she'll be evicted from the facility, the only home she has.
"We get complaints from the residents saying, 'They're holding us here against our will. They're threatening to evict us if we leave,'" said Molly Davies, the nursing home and long term care ombudsman for L.A. County. She estimates her office receives between 25 and 35 complaints like Lucy's every week. Residents report being barred from leaving even for doctor's appointments, Davies said.
Her office investigates complaints and monitors the safety and well-being of residents but can't enforce regulations -- in L.A. that's up to the County Department of Public Health.
A slew of employees come and go every day to work in nursing homes. In their free time, they go grocery shopping and run small errands. Davies said residents are entitled to the same freedoms, so long as they take appropriate precautions like wearing a mask and physically distancing.
"It's a violation of the residents' rights ... we're talking about nursing homes, we're not talking about prisons," she said.
The California Association of Health Facilities, a trade group that lobbies for 80% of the nursing homes in the state, doesn't see it that way.
Competent residents have the right to leave, said DeAnn Walters, the association's clinical affairs director. But she said the risk of asymptomatic spread could mean a resident is placed in a 14-day quarantine when they get back.
"There shouldn't necessarily be this, 'You're not allowed to go anywhere,' but there will be a lot of education around the risk of going out to themselves, to the others in the facilities," Walters said.
She maintained that employees differ from residents because they have training in infection control. And Walters argued that because facility administrators want to reduce the number of people infected in the community surrounding their nursing home, they need the flexibility to respond to local COVID-19 conditions.
IS THREATENING EVICTION LEGAL?
Nursing home critics challenge the basis for some of these rules.
"In the absence of consistent and widespread testing of health care workers at these facilities, it is the height of hypocrisy to say that residents must not be readmitted in order to prevent transmission of the virus," said Mike Dark, an attorney with the watchdog group California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform.
Instead of infection control, the motivation to keep residents from leaving boils down to money, he said.
"There have always been problems with nursing homes finding ways to kick residents -- especially Medi-Cal residents -- out so that they can make that bed available for a more lucrative Medicare patient," Dark said.
Threatening eviction is a tactic that started long before the pandemic, he argued. Most nursing homes are for-profit, so they want shorter-term residents on Medicare, which provides a higher reimbursement rate. Usually, there are legal safeguards to prevent financially-motivated evictions.
"In normal times if a resident walked out and then was not permitted back in, that would be a plain violation of the law," Dark said. "It would be called a wrongful refusal to readmit and a nursing home could face penalties [from the state health department] and even financial fines."
But is it against the law now? Dark said it largely depends on how the policy is communicated to the resident. The new coronavirus regulations make that murky.
"If they have a policy of not readmitting people after they go out but it's unwritten and people aren't told about it so they can't even know that that's the consequence of leaving the facility, that could certainly get them in trouble with [the California Department of Public Health] and should be the subject of a complaint," he said.
Calling it "a legal grey area," Dark said if a resident has been informed beforehand in writing that the facility won't allow re-entry due to fear of contagion, it may be much harder to get that resident reinstated.
"It puts them in a terribly dangerous situation, without a place to stay during a pandemic," he said. "Many of those people, especially ones without families, will become homeless."
HOW MUCH LONGER INSIDE?
Lucy isn't ready to gamble on becoming homeless just for the sake of taking a walk. But she said there needs to be a better balance between protecting vulnerable people from the coronavirus and the mental and physical toll of strictly limiting their movements.
After more than five months locked inside a nursing home where she both contracted and recovered from COVID-19, Lucy just wants to get out, even for a couple of hours.
"I lost a lot before I came here," she said. "I need to be somewhere I'm not being videotaped. Sometimes I just need to cry. I need to be away from here to do that. I just need to be free to think and feel."
SHARE YOUR STORY
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.