Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
'The Herpes Of Urban Transit' And Other Scooter Feelings You Shared With Us

Hot-blooded scooter hate is very real. This has been well established. But what about the love? With a million rides reported by Los Angeles transportation officials in the first month of the city's grand scooter experiment, clearly many of you adore these contraptions. Others still have complex, conflicted, nuanced or otherwise colorful feelings.
So we asked you this direct question: Are scooters your mobility solution or your neighborhood menace?
Here's a sampling of how you, our beloved LAist readers, responded. Comments have been edited for clarity and style.
DON'T BLAME THE SCOOTERS, BLAME THE ROADS
Kelsey Harris:
I think they're a great idea, in theory. I rode them around D.C. and had a great time. However, here in Silver Lake (and the majority of L.A. neighborhoods), our streets are so rickety that I didn't really feel safe riding them in the bike lane, and I felt like a jerk riding them on the sidewalk, so I haven't been using them. My partner works near USC and he rides them daily to go get lunch, so they can be handy!
I love them. I've become a huge fan and use them frequently in downtown L.A. [where] I see other riders all the time. I even invested in my own scooter.
Riding scooters downtown has made me appreciate and understand the poor quality of our bike infrastructure and streets overall. The pavement is terrible and bike lanes are treacherous. Even the best bike lanes (on Figueroa) could use some improvement. For example, they run one-way but they are so well-protected that they attract two-way traffic.
L.A. also has a long way to go in understanding that the bike lane is a traffic lane that can not be parked, idled or loitered in. I hope that the scooter "revolution" takes cars off the road and brings more people into the car-free-mobility umbrella. Maybe we can see improved infrastructure as a result.

I think they have potential to be a great asset to transportation, especially in a city with transportation issues like Los Angeles, but it seems irresponsible [of] the city and the companies involved to just release them into the wild without proper infrastructure planning.
I live in East Hollywood / Los Feliz, where there are no bike lanes on the narrow roads and the sidewalks are also narrow and uneven. As a pedestrian, I've been nearly barreled over by scooters flying down the sidewalks, but it's equally terrifying to see scooters flying down the streets in between parked cars and moving cars. In places like Santa Monica, where there are bike lanes, it seems safer, but it's wild out here!
I love using the e-scooters and they have really helped me get around my surrounding neighborhoods easily, which is nice because my immediate neighborhood does not have many food or recreation options. Most people I know who use them, ride on the sidewalks, not on the streets. We know that is not the right way, but the streets feel much more dangerous. Drivers are not good at dealing with bicyclists, let alone scooters.
Scooters are great! Overall, I really like them and we need more micromobility in L.A., not less. But L.A. is not set up with good bike infrastructure and has excessive traffic, making it dangerous. Unfortunately, many [users] are not trained in scooter riding (I have been riding my trusty GoPed kick scooter for 20 years). Scooters are not like bikes in that they make sharper turns and should require helmet use.
Scooter vandals are abhorrent and anyone posting that on social media should have to pay for the damage.
I use them almost every day (mostly to replace Uber or Lyft trips). They've completely changed the way I move around downtown. The only thing holding these devices back from significantly impacting travel habits is the lack of dedicated road space. L.A. needs more protected bike lanes, everywhere, yesterday.

Topher Hendricks:
I love them. I've had so many horrible close-calls with drivers in cars in Los Angeles almost every day. Cars are also the leading cause of climate change, so I am grateful to see scooters challenge cars' dangerous and irresponsible hegemony in this city.
In August last year, I moved to an area of Santa Monica that allowed me to walk to work in about 30 minutes. I still had a car, but when my lease ended in October, I decided to try out not having a car. I use my bike, ride-shares, Metro and scooters, and they're all used for slightly different reasons. All together, they allow me to not have a car.
They're perfect for those 1-2 mile trips that L.A. has a ton of -- not just a quick, cheap, and fun way to reach places, but one that most importantly is emissions-free, which is crucial as we continue to address climate change.

Liz B.:
I refer to them as the herpes of urban transit because they're unattractive and annoying, yet here to stay. While I hate them, I understand they fill a need for affordable, convenient last-mile transit, which is why they are so popular.
As a bicyclist who went car-free last year, I'm all for moving away from cars. But as a pedestrian, I'm frustrated by how scooters speed up stupidity.
I work at UCLA and I see students in near scooter accidents almost daily. On one hand I think they are a great solution for mobility. On the other hand, I am surprised that more students have not been grievously injured. Scootering with headphones on, while texting, wearing flip flops, with a yoga mat tucked under one arm and going through red lights oblivious to your surroundings -- not a good idea!
I live and work in Santa Monica. One thing the city of L.A. is doing better than SaMo is using its 311 operators to capture complaints and notify e-scooter operators. SaMo traffic enforcement refers citizens to e-scooter operators' toll-free complaint numbers, essentially conveying the message that citizens are on our own. No wonder many of us find e-scooters to be more a nuisance than a useful transportation option.
I would be fine with them if the people who use them were responsible. As a pedestrian, I've been hit once and almost hit several other times. I feel like I have to constantly be on the alert, and I'm sick of seeing them in parks and other places they don't belong. It's a free-for-all, and I don't get the sense that riders are using them to "commute." (They're) mostly joy riders.

(It's) a preposterous notion that any company is allowed to litter the city with their for-profit garbage. What about the concerns of actual citizens, homeowners, business owners that are forced to deal with (the) f---ing things?
Living in downtown Long Beach, I personally LOATHE the scooters. They are a safety hazard to myself and my dog when I am walking. Intoxicated humans, tourists and minors ride without concern for others.
"I work with the senior population and these scooters -- left on sidewalks as they often are -- cause great hardship to older adults who may use mobility devices."
I live in West Hollywood and our city decided to not allow the e-scooters and bikes to be dropped off within city limits. The problem is that WeHo is surrounded by Los Angeles on three sides, so scooters and e-bikes are dropped off just outside WeHo city limits and many are used in West Hollywood.
I'm disturbed that the scooters and e-bikes are mostly ridden on the sidewalk where it is dangerous as a pedestrian. I walk most everywhere I go within WeHo and have had to jump out of the way nearly daily from noiseless e-scooters riding on the sidewalk -- despite the fact that there is a separate bike path on the western part of [town].

How is it OK for these "disruptive" companies to use public walkways as their private storage? I couldn't park freight on the sidewalks; I couldn't install freezers or storage out on the sidewalks. Why are these companies allowed to profit without providing the infrastructure?
I have never ridden one. In a car-centric city, I wouldn't feel safe.
The concept is admirable and perhaps in a world where "I know better" and "I can do whatever I want" aren't the prevailing mindsets, scooters would be a viable transportation option. I often hear scooter advocates countering anti-scooter attitudes with statements about the unsustainability of cars, the need to find alternative transportation methods that don't add to the problem, create more traffic, etc. All true, but the scooter "solution" is only as good as the worst scooter user, of which there are many.
Until L.A. (and any other city that allows scooters) can figure out a way to ensure safe ridership and responsible usage (including not dropping scooters wherever they feel like it, following rules of traffic, etc.), I don't see them as anything more than a nuisance, and one that will continue to generate just as much hatred as it does fans.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
With California voters facing a decision on redistricting this November, Surf City is poised to join the brewing battle over Congressional voting districts.
-
The drug dealer, the last of five defendants to plead guilty to federal charges linked to the 'Friends' actor’s death, will face a maximum sentence of 65 years in prison.
-
The weather’s been a little different lately, with humidity, isolated rain and wind gusts throughout much of Southern California. What’s causing the late-summer bout of gray?
-
Hexavalent chromium is the same carcinogen Erin Brockovich warned about in the 1990s, but researchers say more study is needed on the potential health effects of nanoparticles detected earlier this year. Experts will answer questions at a webinar this evening.
-
The budget gap has led to a tuition hike, along with spending cuts and fewer course offerings. At the same time, generative AI already has transformed higher ed — including post-grad job prospects.
-
The construction work is part of a $143.7 million plan to rehabilitate pavement between Van Nuys and Westwood along the Sepulveda Pass.