Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
L.A. Times' 'Quakebot' Erroneously Reports Massive Earthquake From 1925
(Photo by David McNew/Getty Images)
()
At about 4:30 p.m. on Wednesday, there came news from the L.A. Times about a massive earthquake. The report said that a 6.8 temblor had just struck the Santa Barbara area. To give you a sense of scope, the 1994 Northridge Quake was of a magnitude 6.7— this one was bigger.
The event spelled great danger, but...no one felt anything. Outside, the birds kept chirping, and motorists sat idly in gridlock traffic. Everything was as usual. What happened? It turned out that "Quakebot," the Times' automated earthquake reporter (it actually gets its own byline), had relayed a bit of false information from the U.S. Geological Survey. That 6.8 quake had actually happened in 1925.
Wait, what?
Let's backtrack. Quakebot is actually an algorithm that was designed by a journalist and programmer for the L.A. Times, according to Slate. Whenever the USGS sends out a report of a quake that's above a certain size, Quakebot takes that data and plugs it into a pre-written template, and voila, we have an article about an earthquake.
Support for LAist comes from
Except something went wrong this time around. The Times retracted the story about the 6.8 quake almost as soon as it'd gone up. "The quake appears to have been from 1925," said the Times.
The problem seems to have started when the USGS sent out a false alert:
Alerts were sent for a M6.8 in California. This was an error. More information to come.
— USGS (@USGS) June 22, 2017
And here's the report itself:
No 6.8 earthquake in Santa Barbara area, USGS sent out a mistake. Pic of email sent out below is a mistake. No quake felt here in SB. pic.twitter.com/p5MTF86Gjv
— Claire Flores (@ClaireTVnews) June 21, 2017
The Times later explained what had happened: it turns out that a Caltech staffer, while trying to correct the location of the 1925 quake, had accidentally sent out an alert for that quake in the process. Those with a keen eye (or those who bothered to read the report) would have seen that the quake was described as happening in 2025, which would have aroused suspicions immediately. After the report was sent out, Quakebot did its job and relayed it back to us feeble humans. So that's how it all went down.
Anyway, there's no massive earthquake! We'll all having an OK day, though it may be a rough one for a certain non-sentient reporter.
Support for LAist comes from
LAist reached out to the USGS, but no one was immediately available for comment.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago. -
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
Best of LAist