Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
L.A. City Council Approves Support for a $30 Million 2-Mile Beach Bike Path

Along the Marvin Braude Bike Path in Santa Monica | Photo by stevendamron via Flickr
A controversial resolution supporting federal funding of a $30 million, nearly 2-mile bike path north of Santa Monica was approved today by the L.A. City Council. On one side of the issue were bicycle community organizers who thought it was a bad idea to seek money for this in the current fiscal climate while supporters agreed that it wouldn't send a bad message, it helps tourism and save lives.
Having a resolution on file in the city's federal legislative packet is a pre-emptive tool if money for such a project ever came to fruition, whether it be through coastal, transportation or other funding sources. "There's nothing negative with pushing this forward," said Council President Eric Garcetti, "no doubt, this is a positive."
The 19-mile Marvin Braude Bike Path along the Pacific Ocean stops 1.9 miles short of Los Angeles' border with Malibu. Officials and residents would like that gap be completed for reasons of safety, commuting, recreation and tourism. Speaking on behalf of the Pacific Palisades Community Council, resident George Wolfberg said this would continue building California's Millennium Legacy Trail, a long-term project to build a public trail system along the state's 1100 miles of coastline.
For bicycle activist Stephen Box, who in most cases would thrilled to see the city pursuing bicycle funding, this money could be spent more wisely. "There's no time greater than right now for us to demonstrate financial responsibility, regardless of whose money it is," he said. "This does not send a message that we're paying attention to what we spend, where we spend it, how we spend it."
Councilmembers Paul Krekorian and Dennis Zine, the two dissenting votes, agreed. "We sit here talking about no revenue. I think what we send is a very sad message," Zine said, noting that he supports the project, just not during the current budget situation.
"Have some vision for the city," yelled back Councilmember Tom LaBonge, who said he will support the bike path in Zine's West Valley district when and if funds come up for the L.A. River project.
"I have to say in good conscious, asking for $30 million to provide a 'breathtaking view'?" asked cyclist Alex Thompson, quoting the city analyst report (.pdf), which also states safety--"to avoid having bicyclists riding in unsafe conditions on Pacific Coast Highway"-- as a reason for the project.
Cyclist Enci Box called it the "bike path to nowhere." She asked that for projects that benefit the larger population and everyday commuter, "regardless of transportation." For Box, her husband Stephen and Thompson, they would like to see funding go into something like the Backbone Bikeway Network, a plan they participated in creating. It would focus the city on safety improvements and maintenance to key roads throughout the city, allowing for "cyclist's freedom to move."
But Councilman Bill Rosendahl, who authored the the resolution, called the section of Pacific Coast Highway along the missing bike path the most dangerous, adding that the path is "the most traversed bike path in the nation."
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
Monarch butterflies are on a path to extinction, but there is a way to support them — and maybe see them in your own yard — by planting milkweed.
-
With California voters facing a decision on redistricting this November, Surf City is poised to join the brewing battle over Congressional voting districts.
-
The drug dealer, the last of five defendants to plead guilty to federal charges linked to the 'Friends' actor’s death, will face a maximum sentence of 65 years in prison.