One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
World's Largest Garbage Dump next to Joshua Tree National Park?
Photo by Paraflyer via Flickr
Photo by Paraflyer via Flickr
In a major victory for environmentalists, the 9th District Court of Appeals today sided with the National Parks Conservation Association in a fight against a landfill, which would be surrounded by Joshua Tree National Park on three sides, meant for garbage from L.A. County brought in by train.
The two decades old proposal has been stuck in various court cases over the last 18 years and if defendants decide to appeal today's decision, there's no telling when this saga will end.
At issue is a 4,654-acre site (complete with canyons), about 1.5 miles from the park's boundaries. Owners of the property, along with a blessing from the government's Bureau of Land Management, want to sell it to L.A. County for use as a land fill that would take in 20,000 tons a day when in operation, which would be 16 hours a day for six days a week for 117 years.
Needless to say, that much trash and activity is harmful to the goals of conservation (for example: trash could increase the raven and coyote population. Both species also eat the endangered desert tortoises). Add to that, the proposed landfill would be near park wilderness, which is the highest level of designated protection the federal government can give a piece of land.
The National Parks Conservation Association, which calls the proposed project the largest landfill in the world, says L.A. County could avoid needing such a space if the Mesquite Landfill were to be used in addition to a recycling rate by 10 percent to 60 percent.
The Stanford Environmental Law Clinic fought the case on behalf of the association. Also involved in the case against the landfill were Larry and Donna Charpied. Huell Howser fans might remember them being featured in an episode about the jojoba plant.
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
