Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your year-end tax-deductible gift now.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Investigation: L.A. Vegan Restaurants Found with Un-Vegan Food
Part of the process was to order food, use plastic gloves and contain it ASAP | Photo via Quarrygirl
The two anonymous bloggers at the popular vegan blog, Quarrygirl, went all out and published a large investigative report today, finding that a handful of vegan restaurants, mostly Thai in nature, are in fact not vegan.
Spending their own money--around $1000, they said by e-mail--on scientific industry tests, using strict practices and a positive control, they investigated at least one dish at 17 restaurants with ten passing as vegan. Seven, including a favorite of the theirs, Pure Luck, failed to be vegan when one or a few dishes were tested. Five were Thai vegan eateries (Vegan House, Lotus Vegan, California Vegan, LA Vegan Thai Vegan Joint), which led them to researching their suppliers and calling Taiwanese officials, finding out that real meat in faux meats was a problem with new legislation addressing the issue actually taking effect this week Wednesday. The last restaurant found not to be vegan was Green Leaves in Los Feliz.
Kudos to the folks at the blog for doing this, especially for most appropriately noting that these tests are not necessarily a final conclusion on each of the restaurant's daily food service. "While these tests show some very specific results, and were conducted under laboratory conditions, they are really a snapshot of the moment in time and may not be completely representative," they wrote. "If we were to do the tests again today, would the results be the same? Could conditions at the exact time we bought the food have a bearing on the outcome?"
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
