About LAist

LAist is a website about Los Angeles. More

Editor: Zach Behrens Publisher: Gothamist

About | Archive | Contact | Mobile | RSS | Staff

Categories
Recent Comments
Favorites
Contribute

Latest tip:

ITS NOT IT'S IN THE JESENA STORY [more]

 

Latest link:

 

Latest Photo:

 

Subscribe
Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from LAist.
Neighborhood Project, Los Angeles Communities

Links

August 21, 2007

West Hollywood Gay Bar Micky's Badly Burned in Fire

West Hollywood Gay Bar Micky's Burned Down in Fire

Because no one was seriously injured in this afternoon's fire in West Hollywood, it's probably ok to bust with some tasteless jokes.

But we wont lower ourselves to that level. In fact we won't even snicker that the fire started at 4:30pm, mere minutes after the infamous 420 which many in WeHo celebrate.

(Here in EaHo we celebrate it too)

Instead we will simply run this photo sent to us by Scott from Boi From Troy, and quote a source from the mainstream media, even though they usually blow.

A fire broke out at Micky's on Santa Monica Boulevard in West Hollywood on Tuesday afternoon.

Santa Monica Boulevard was shut down in the area, so fire crews could get to the blaze.

The flames from the fire shot through the two story building's roof. Dozens of firefighters reported to the blaze, with some going on the roof of the building to battle the flames. KABC

"I would totally be blogging this [story about the fire] but BoiFromTroy is in the final stages of a total revamp, prompted by a Denial of Service/Malicious attack and other evil gremlins, and a change of server," Scott wrote in an email to LAist. "In all of this, I remembered the bar's theme for its fire-truck Pride Float this year... 'West Hollywood's FLAMING gay bar.'"

photo by Scott from Boi From Troy


Email This Entry







Advertisement: LAist Continues Below!

Comments (19)

Maybe it's the paranoia talking, but it makes me consider the possibility of homophobic intent. What better way to say "burn in hell" than to burn down the place?

 

When, if, it's rebuilt/sold. They should call it "Karma," though it saddens me for the loss of their employees source of income. The owners, Michael and Lann, are very selfish and greedy people for which I have no remorse. And Maryann, the GM, is unfortunitely a victim to their crude and despicable ways. Meet karma, my friends, meet karma.

To my friends and ex-workers, godspeed.

 

Micky's was on the market already. Insurance claim, anyone?

 

OK i wont even touch the fact you were frothing at the mouth to make gay panic jokes... i mean gays, flames, fires... i get it... we all do. i think one would WANT to refrain from being a hack but maybe that's just me... but what really made my eyes roll was the overreaching in finding a link between weed and the time of the fire... i'm speechless actually. i mean gays are synonymous with many things but i wouldn't say that's one of them. i would say at this point weed is probably the lowest common denominator amongst anyone under the age of 40... and you are special 'cause i'm guessing you're over 40.

 

If gays want to denounce homophobia and make the case that they're just like the breeders except that they screw each other, is strutting their stuff in Fruit 'o the Looms really the best way to make it?
Combined with the "flaming" tagline... too easy a mark for the evangelical set to even touch that one.

 

dear anonymous negative commentor, aka Guest #4

while your eyes were rolling they should have been reading

the quote that you refer to said, in part:

"...the fire started at 4:30pm, mere minutes after the infamous 420 which many in WeHo celebrate.

(Here in EaHo we celebrate it too)"

where did we say that 420 was a gay thing? we said that it was a WeHo thing, and we were alluding to the fact that WeHo has been targeted recently by the Feds in regards to their 420 ways, specifically in regards to their medical marijuana dispensaries which have been attacked by the DEA.

if youre going to be Nameless, and Speechless, perhaps you should consider being Commentless too if youre not going to read what is actually being written.

your assumptions are yours, and theyre wrong, and if youre going to try to be critical, do us all the favor of putting your name next to it, so we know who we can roll our eyes at.

 

visions of ganja aren't what i see when i think of weho is what i'm saying... and in all seriousness the people who really rely on dispensaries are never fucking celebrating at 420, just the ones partly responsible for the DEA crackdown (i.e. the ones who AREN'T SICK yet still have cards). you were still overreaching there, maybe because you waked and baked

 

you are overreaching like MAD in your comments

- people who have cards Aren't sick, and thats why the DEA cracks down on WeHo medicinaries

- weed smokers dont smoke at 4:20

- because you dont have the patience to actually read what its written WE are the ones who wake and bake?

all of those are your assbackwards beliefs that you are projecting on others.

theres a reason why you dont put your real name next to your bullshit. i say it's because you know youre full of shit.

if you have anything further to say about our blog, i invite you to take the 6 seconds that it requires to sign up, sign up using your real name, and then state your malarkey. until then keep your projections to yourself.

 

"...the fire started at 4:30pm, mere minutes after the infamous 420 which many in WeHo celebrate."

"weed smokers don't smoke at 4:20"

So which is it?

 

is today the convention of the Dumbest Anonymous Negative Commentors of LAist?

#9, i was pointing out #4's ridiculous projections.

he/she was saying that 4:20 isnt a time when weed smokers smoke weed.

i never said that.

and another thing, #9, post again without signing up and youre banned.

you have posted dozens of negative anonymous comments on this blog. you have had months to sign up but for some reason you want to hide in the bushes and be negative.

either sign up with your real name and real email address or find another blog to troll

that goes double for you #4

 

http://lastnightadjsavemylife.blogspot.com/2007/08/roof-roof-roof-is-on-fire.html

 

i don't mean to sound like an asshole, but as of right now this blog really bites. i comment because it can be better... the premise and the demographic it covets and your staff seem like nice enough people, but there's so much room for improvement it's not even funny. maybe i don't like a mediocre blog being representative of my city, especially one where its masthead isn't representative of the city. i know you're not the l.a. times but if your blog aims to serve the entire city and all of its races and personalities with some sort of insight and historical perspective then your staff reflective of the people. any way, i don't purport to know any of you but judging by the stories you're not very different. and with that i leave you with my last anonymous comment. btw and ps: i did register before you changed your whole comment system. don't assume it's because we're scared, rather it's because we're lazy. bye now

 

when you write anonymously and intentionally so, you dont sound like an asshole, you are an asshole.

if you want the blog better, fine. i want the comments to be better. which means responsible comments by responsible people who take at least 2 seconds to sign in before they criticize something that took me or my writers quite a while to post.

 

What if I want to register a name like "Tony Pierce, Failed Poet" or "My Pussy Hurts" or "What Color Is Tony Today?"? Can I still comment then?

 

you could but the questions would be:

-what the hell are you hiding?
- what do you have to be afraid of?
- why would you want people to think you're probably full of shit hiding in the weeds lobbing negative anonymous comments like a little bitch?

if you really have that little conviction in what you have to say, go ahead and pick a fake name, but if you want to be taken seriously and play like the big boys and girls do, then do the right thing.

... or be a fucking coward piece of crap like you seem quite comfortable being.

 

stop acting as if laist is infallible and i'll get a fucking handle so i can comment. goddammit.

 

you're a former fratboy who for the past 20 years still fancies himself a bit radical. why i bother with you i do not know. but trying to change someone's mind is an exercise in futility so i should be embarassed for even trying.

 

Just wanted to comment on the weed....
(Medical Cannabis)... Just wanted to say .. That it is not a Gay thing and it is not just a WeHo thing either... It does not matter what Country .. Town or City... Marijuana has been around long before Man .... It is a natural herb... Do not Blame anything on it... That is like .. when someone shoots someone... they do not blame the gun... They blame the shooter...
And Guns are bad ... But, yet to most people they are leagal.. and are used in wars to kill people.. And Marajuana only makes people Hungry and give them some good Idea's... Look at all ur Famous people who used Marajana... I do not like guns so I am not going to buy one or use it..
If you do not like Marajuana ..Then do not buy it or use it... Don't be Ha8tn...
Oh ..and i will leave my name JCSummit I ain't scurd ..say something ..NOW WHAT... assholes

 

now what, JC? why not register to comment so the next time you bless us with your knowledge you can show everyone that youre truly not scurd

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)

2003-2008 Gothamist LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use & Privacy Policy. We use MovableType.