Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
Take Two

The argument for - and against - the Keystone XL Pipeline

Pipes for TransCanada's planned Keystone XL pipeline are stored in Gascoyne, N.D. The Senate has voted to approve the proposed project, which would allow crude oil to flow from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico.

Take Two translates the day’s headlines for Southern California, making sense of the news and cultural events that affect our lives. Produced by Southern California Public Radio and broadcast from October 2012 – June 2021. Hosted by A Martinez.

Get LA News Updates Daily

We brief you on what you need to know about L.A. today.
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
Listen 6:57
The argument for - and against - the Keystone XL Pipeline

The Keystone XL Pipeline would take crude oil from the tar sands in Canada through Montana, South Dakota and Nebraska and connect to existing pipelines that carry oil to refineries on the Gulf Coast.

The Senate on Thursday night passed a bill forcing its approval, even though President Obama has threatened to veto it. The House approved a similar bill earlier. 

The argument over the pipeline has gotten increasingly heated over the last five years and as, Coral Davenport writes in the New York Times, "has become a proxy for far broader fights over climate change, energy and the economy."

Environmentalist have seized on it, and attacked the project, arguing the process of extracting oil form the Canadian tar sands is expensive and energy intensive. Those in favor say the Keystone XL will create a lot of jobs and pump billions into the economy. 

Davenport says there is a little truth to each argument but that most experts agree that the effects, should the pipeline happen, will be negligible when it comes to the job market or climate change.