Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
Take Two

Supreme Court sides with Samsung in patent dispute with Apple

NEW YORK, NY - OCTOBER 11: People walk by the new Samsung store in lower Manhattan on October 11, 2016 in New York City. Less than two months after its launch, Samsung Electronics has announced that it is discontinuing its flagship Galaxy Note 7 smartphone after repeated reports of fires starting in the phones. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
People walk by the new Samsung store in lower Manhattan in this October 11, 2016 file photo taken in New York City. The Supreme Court on Tuesday unanimously backed Samsung in a patent dispute filed by Apple over the design of the two companies' flagship smartphones.
(
Spencer Platt/Getty Images
)

Take Two translates the day’s headlines for Southern California, making sense of the news and cultural events that affect our lives. Produced by Southern California Public Radio and broadcast from October 2012 – June 2021. Hosted by A Martinez.

Get LA News Updates Daily

We brief you on what you need to know about L.A. today.
Listen 6:52
Supreme Court sides with Samsung in patent dispute with Apple

The Supreme Court has unanimously backed Samsung in a patent dispute filed by Apple over the design of the two companies' flagship smartphones.

Here's more from the Associated Press:



The justices said Samsung may not be required to pay all the profits it earned from 11 phone models because the features at issue are only a tiny part of the devices.



Apple had won a $399 million judgment against Samsung for copying parts of the iPhone's patented design, but the case now returns to a lower court to decide what Samsung must pay.



The case is part of a series of disputes between the technology rivals that began in 2011. Apple accused Samsung of duplicating a handful of distinctive iPhone features for which Apple holds patents: the flat screen, the rounded rectangle shape of the phone, and the layout of icons on the screen.



At issue was how much Samsung is required to compensate Apple under an 1887 law that requires patent infringers to pay "total profit." Apple said that meant all the profits from the phone sales, while Samsung argued it was limited to profits related to the specific components that were copied.

Wall Street Journal legal affairs reporter Brent Kendall joins Take Two to discuss.