Support for LAist comes from
Audience-funded nonprofit news
Stay Connected
Audience-funded nonprofit news
Listen
Podcasts Take Two
Police say YouTube shooter had a dispute with the company
solid orange rectangular banner
()
Apr 4, 2018
Listen 5:50
Police say YouTube shooter had a dispute with the company
The woman who opened fire at YouTube's headquarters claimed the web site was trying to suppress content creators.
YouTube's headquarters is seen during an active shooter situation in San Bruno, California on April 03, 2018.                      
Gunshots erupted at YouTube's offices in California Tuesday, sparking a panicked escape by employees and a massive police response, before the shooter -- a woman -- apparently committed suicide.Police said three people had been hospitalized with gunshot injuries following the shooting in the city of San Bruno, and that a female suspect was found dead at the scene. "We have one subject who is deceased inside the building with a self-inflicted wound," San Bruno Police Chief Ed Barberini told reporters. "At this time, we believe it to be the shooter."
 / AFP PHOTO / JOSH EDELSON        (Photo credit should read JOSH EDELSON/AFP/Getty Images)
YouTube's headquarters is seen during an active shooter situation in San Bruno, California on April 03, 2018.
(
JOSH EDELSON/AFP/Getty Images
)

The woman who opened fire at YouTube's headquarters claimed the web site was trying to suppress content creators.

The 39-year-old woman who opened fire on YouTube's California headquarters Tuesday had a long-running dispute with YouTube, according to law enforcement officials.

Nasim Aghdam, who used the name Nasime Sabz online, had decried YouTube's policies, saying the web site was trying to "suppress" content creators. Her father, Ismail Aghdam, told the Bay Area News Group that she "hated" the company.

Mark Bergen is a technology reporter with Bloomberg. He said Aghdam's frustrations with YouTube appear to be tied to the site's policies of not allowing ads on certain videos, a process called 'de-monetizing.'

Bergen said these de-monetization policies have changed in the last year because advertisers complained about their ads running before videos with offensive content. Some advertisers even suspended their ads on YouTube, so the company responded by becoming more restrictive about which videos could have ads.

YouTube did not have many policies moderating content when the site began, but as the site grew, it began to see a need for some restrictions, Bergen said. 



YouTube is now massive... They didn't put a lot of these policies in place over the years. Now they're scrambling to come up with policies that can appease both the advertisers and the video creators, which is an incredibly difficult thing to do.

Some content creators were upset by the new ad policies because they were seeing less ad revenue, and others felt YouTube was not transparent enough about their policy changes, Bergen said, but YouTube has said only a small number of creators have seen large dips in revenue, and they're trying to improve transparency.