Dr. Richard Pan: There’s always room for interpretation of the findings. You have bullet holes, toxicology reports and one has to look at the detail of the examination. The real challenge is, in most cases, the only autopsy done is done by the county. And we’ve seen incidents, particularly in San Joaquin County, where the sheriff-coroner in a law [enforcement] involved incident puts pressure on a forensic pathologist...and even changes the actual findings.

Dr. Pan: Coroners go back to King Richard the Lionheart, where you basically need a person to say, ‘Well, that person’s actually dead, so we can go after their estate’ [In other words], a lay person.



In the past hundred years, we’ve developed a science of how people die and how that occurred. That’s called forensic pathology. When you see “CSI” and all that science, part of that is what a forensic pathologist is trained in, so they can make a determination as to how the death actually happened. And that can lead to a criminal case…. That’s why it’s so important that these exams are independent.

Dr. Pan: In my role as a legislator, I have fought for science-based policies. I think it’s important that experts are able to apply science, back-up their conclusions with facts and make that available to the public. We need to make sure that we’re making policy on science and same for the criminal justice system. If we have trust on the basis of facts, it’s a way for the community [to come together].