Support for LAist comes from
Local and national news, NPR, things to do, food recommendations and guides to Los Angeles, Orange County and the Inland Empire
Stay Connected
Listen
Podcasts Take Two
Measure S mailers are probably protected free speech, law expert says
solid orange rectangular banner
()
Mar 1, 2017
Listen 4:15
Measure S mailers are probably protected free speech, law expert says
L.A. County Sheriffs were not happy with a mailer with a fake eviction notice. But election law expert Rick Hasen says it's probably protected free speech.
A photo released by the L.A. County Sheriff's Department showing a mailer put out by supporters of Measure S designed to look like an eviction notice, noting the indications that it's not a real eviction notice.
A photo released by the L.A. County Sheriff's Department showing a mailer put out by supporters of Measure S designed to look like an eviction notice, noting the indications that it's not a real eviction notice.
(
Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department
)

L.A. County Sheriffs were not happy with a mailer with a fake eviction notice. But election law expert Rick Hasen says it's probably protected free speech.

You might have gotten a nasty surprise in the mail recently that read, "County of Los Angeles Sheriff's Department. EVICTION NOTICE."

It's not real, though. It's a political mailer.

And Los Angeles County officials were not happy.

"The political mailer depicted in the photos attached to this message is counterfeit and could mislead members of the public to believe they are subject to legal action by the Sheriff’s Department," the Sheriff's department said in a statement.

Sheriffs then sent a cease and desist order to the campaign behind Measure S.

But then the campaign shot back that officials were trying to "censor the free speech rights of the proponents."

Could a misleading mailer like this be protected by the First Amendment?

"It probably is," says Rick Hasen, election law expert at UC-Irvine. "It's really a First Amendment problem to try to limit what people say in campaigns, even if it's false."

Hasen says that, on this matter, courts have said the best answer isn't censorship.

"The proper remedy is to respond and explain why it's false," he says.

But there is a risk in trying tactics like this recent one.

"It doesn't mean it's a smart thing to do. It could backfire politically," says Hasen.

Listen to the full interview by clicking the blue audio player above.