Delegates to The Republican National Convention are leaving Cleveland and heading home today. 

The last endorsements have been given (or not given), and party devotees have heard from a variety of voices, many touting Trump and chiding Clinton. One popular point of contrast for many of those speakers: Trump's take on terror.

"Make America Safe Again" was the official theme of the first day of the gathering, but it became a through-line of the entire convention. Supporters of the Republican nominee say they like his strong stance on security; it's been part of his message since the start of his campaign. 

He reinforced his hardline attitude in his acceptance speech last night:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BT2jTkWxMZU

A string of high-profile terror attacks over the past year has led many to worry about safety on US soil. Could Trump's tough talk about terror bring more people to the polls? 

For answers to that, Take Two spoke to Robert Trager. He's a professor of political science at UCLA, currently on sabbatical at Yale. 

Highlights

Donald Trump has repeatedly said that he will be tougher on terror than Hillary Clinton. It's been about a week since the terror attacks in Nice. Historically-speaking, how do fears over national security play out at polls?

In the past, when a tough-talking candidate has been elected, have they faced scrutiny from their constituents when they wound up taking a lighter, more diplomatic approach?

Out of curiosity, what brings voters out the most?

Press the blue play button above to hear the full interview.