With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
Amid Privacy Concerns, Mattel Shelved Planned Device For Kids
Listen
3:00
Listen to the Story
DAVID GREENE, HOST:
Artificial intelligence is making its way into everyday life. Digital assistants can help you make a grocery list or maybe keep your home climate-controlled. But what if the devices in your home got involved in raising your kids. Well, we have two stories today from NPR's health team on parenting in the age of Alexa. First NPR's Allison Aubrey reports on a talking device that toymaker Mattel pulled from the market.
ALLISON AUBREY, BYLINE: When Mattel first introduced dolls that could talk back in the 1960s, this was considered novel.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
Sponsored message
UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Meet the most amazing doll all time...
AUBREY: Pull a ring, and this doll could speak.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
CHATTY CATHY: Would you like pickle ice cream (laughter)?
AUBREY: But what she couldn't do was listen or interact. And Chatty Cathy certainly could not send information to the cloud.
Flash forward 50 years, and technology has changed. Mattel's latest device, something the company planned to call Aristotle, could get to know your child, even respond to your kids needs. If your baby cried, Aristotle could play a lullaby.
JOSH GOLIN: There is a huge world of difference between a Chatty Cathy and an Aristotle.
Sponsored message
AUBREY: That's Josh Golin. He's an advocate with the group Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood. When he first heard about Aristotle...
GOLIN: My first thought was, wow, is this creepy.
AUBREY: In marketing materials, the Aristotle device looks like a baby monitor with a camera. It was designed to be connected to the Internet and placed in a kid's bedroom.
GOLIN: You're talking about a device that was designed to displace essential parenting functions like soothing a crying baby or reading a bedtime story so that children would form an attachment to it. And then that device could be used to collect all sorts of information on a child in their own bedroom.
AUBREY: Now, some tech bloggers wrote enthusiastically about Aristotle and its planned release. But the buzz quickly turned to criticism when pediatricians, parents, even politicians weighed in. Two lawmakers on Capitol Hill wrote to Mattel with privacy concerns. What was the company going to do with all that information they were collecting from children? Thousands of people signed petitions asking Mattel to pull the plug, which the company did this month. Pediatrician Jenny Radesky of the University of Michigan says the pressure was on.
JENNY RADESKY: We have to remember that children don't really understand concepts such as privacy or machine-learning or the way that the device might be reacting to them or manipulating them.
AUBREY: Radesky says when technology is feeding your kids play ideas, this can limit their creative thinking. And the device could drive them away from interactions with their parents and friends.
Sponsored message
RADESKY: Evidence shows that children learn a lot more from technology when they have an adult scaffolding them and helping them apply what they've learned.
AUBREY: That technology isn't going away. Artificial intelligence is becoming more responsive. The question is, can devices be designed to help bring parents and children together? Allison Aubrey, NPR News. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
