With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
The Trump Administration Just Made The US Citizenship Test Harder To Pass
A Colombian immigrant studies ahead of her citizenship exam at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Queens office on May 30, 2013 in the Long Island City neighborhood in NYC. (Photo by John Moore/Getty Images)
As of Tuesday, Dec. 1, the test for U.S. citizenship will include more potential questions -- questions that will be a little more abstract, making them harder to answer.
Applicants will now be given a list of 128 potential questions in advance (before there were only 100). When they sit down for the test, a USCIS officer will ask them 20 questions from that list (they used to only ask 10). The whole process is verbal -- no multiple choice, no writing down your answers. You need to get 12 answers correct to pass.
Here's an example. The old test had this question:
The idea of self-government is in the first three words of the Constitution. What are these words?
Sponsored message
The answer to the above question is very straightforward. There's only one correct response: "We the People."
Now the question has been changed to this:
The U.S. Constitution starts with the words "We the People." What does "We the People" mean?
See the difference? Now we have a more open-ended question that could be answered in a variety of ways. It's basically an essay question in disguise. You could do a dissertation on this top.
Test-takers will have to give one of these answers to get it right: Self-government, Popular sovereignty, Consent of the governed, or People should govern themselves (Example of) social contract.
If the person taking the test answers slightly differently, it's up the USCIS officer to decide whether or not their answer meets the criteria for correctness.
Which version of the question do you think is easier?
Sponsored message
Rosalind Gold, Chief Public Policy Officer for the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO) Educational Fund, an L.A.-based non-profit that works on immigration and naturalization issues, says her organization is concerend that the new questions will make passing the test more difficult, especially for non-native English speakers:
"One of our deep concerns about the new questions and answers is that many of the [them] are abstract or use complicated English language, which will make it difficult for applicants to prepare. And it will increase the possibility that applicants could be denied citizenship because they don't answer correctly."
Our news is free on LAist. To make sure you get our coverage: Sign up for our daily newsletters. To support our non-profit public service journalism: Donate Now.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
