With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
LA Metro Leaders Want To Rethink Public Safety, But Say They're Forced To Give Police More Money
Los Angeles Police Department officers patrol an L (Gold) Line station in this file photo. (Courtesy L.A. Metro)
()
Los Angeles County's public transit agency pays the LAPD, L.A. County Sheriff's Department and Long Beach Police Department to patrol its system.
But those roughly $645 million, five-year contracts (which run through June 2022) weren't large enough, according to L.A. Metro's upper management. The agency's board has voted to add $36 million to the contracts through the end of this year.
Community activists and transit advocates opposed the increased spending. They've been calling on Metro's leaders to defund law enforcement and reinvest that money in public safety programs that don't require an armed police presence. Some cited a recent report that showed Black riders are disporportionately stopped and cited by police officers and Sheriff's deputies.
The Metro board also approved an amendment requesting upwards of $40 million in next year's budget to fund programs like unarmed transit ambassadors and improved homeless outreach teams. The agency recently created a committee to recommend initiatives like those.
Support for LAist comes from
Metro leaders say they want to move faster to implement alternatives to armed policing on the system, but also said they've been forced to give more money to law enforcement agencies this year to address "out of control" contract spending.
For more on yesterday's vote and the public response, read my full story here:
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
What do stairs have to do with California’s housing crisis? More than you might think, says this Culver City councilmember. -
Yes, it's controversial, but let me explain. -
Doctors say administrator directives allow immigration agents to interfere in medical decisions and compromise medical care. -
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings. -
People moving to Los Angeles are regularly baffled by the region’s refrigerator-less apartments. They’ll soon be a thing of the past. -
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases.
Best of LAist