With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
Your space to help you get the most out of LGBTQ+ life in Greater Los Angeles. Queer LA is a long-term project to help you figure out things big and small — with a focus on joy.
How Silver Lake’s Last ‘No Cruising’ Signs Got Taken Down
From left: Silver Lake Neighborhood Council member Maebe A. Girl, L.A. council members Hugo Soto-Martínez and Nithya Raman, and resident Donovan Daughtry stand by a “No U-turn” sign
(
Courtesy Councilmember Nithya Raman's office
)
Topline:
The last known batch of Silver Lake’s “no U-turn” signs came down this week. The old signs were how police clamped down on cruising in the ‘90s — when gay men circled certain streets to find romantic partners — arresting anyone who did a U-turn on Griffith Park Boulevard between the hours of 12 and 6 a.m.
Why were the signs still there? Most of the signs were taken down in 2011. It’s unclear why nine U-turn signs were left up, according to Nick Barnes-Batista, communications director for L.A. city Councilmember Hugo Soto-Martinez, but they’re on the lookout for ones elsewhere.
Who got the signs removed? Silver Lake resident Donovan Daughtry learned about the remaining signs through a podcast episode that explored L.A.’s gay scene in the ‘80s and ‘90s, and he raised the issue with councilmember Nithya Raman’s office. The Silver Lake Neighborhood Council later petitioned to get the signs taken down permanently.
Support for LAist comes from
Where are they being taken? According to Barnes-Batista, the neighborhood council is arranging to donate the signs to L.A.-based ONE Archives, the world’s largest repository of LGBTQ+ material.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight. -
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious. -
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress. -
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent. -
Kevin Lacy has an obsession with documenting California’s forgotten and decaying places. -
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures.
Best of LAist