Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
LA Teachers Union Has Pushed Possible Strike Date To Monday

United Teachers Los Angeles is postponing its strike until Monday, Jan. 14., at the soonest. The decision was announced this morning, with UTLA citing uncertainty about how a judge would rule on the legality of its original (Jan. 10) strike date.
In court on Thursday morning, though, Los Angeles Unified School District attorneys plan to ask a judge for an even longer delay in the strike date for an unspecified number of days or perhaps even weeks. In court filings, the district's legal team argued that union officials botched the order in which they rolled out their strike plans.
If L.A. Unified's arguments prevail in court, a judge could scramble months' worth of strike planning by union leaders. It could also provide more time to negotiate a deal. The district's filing said a 2009 ruling on similar grounds blocked a one-day strike UTLA had planned and ultimately paved the way to a settlement.
UTLA announced its strike date at a Dec. 19, 2018, press conference. But the district's attorneys will argue that the union didn't give formal notice of its intent to terminate the contract until, at best, Jan. 3.
In effect, LAUSD attorneys will argue the order of those two actions should be reversed: that the law says union leadership should have given notice first, then announced their strike date.
We've asked UTLA to comment on the district's filing and will update this post if they offer a response.
UTLA president Alex Caputo-Pearl has previously criticized the notion that the union didn't give enough lead time for the district to prepare for a strike. At a Monday press conference, he noted that word of the union's strike date announcement on Dec. 19 was spread widely by reporters and through social media.
Caputo-Pearl also noted that district officials "went around the city saying we were striking" in October -- likely a reference to the warnings of an imminent strike that had spread based on a misunderstood op-ed by a UTLA member in the L.A. Times.
Before word of the district's most recent court filings was made public, UTLA leaders faulted LAUSD Superintendent Austin Beutner for attempting to delay the strike through last-minute procedural moves. The district recently went to court in an attempt to block special education members from striking; a judge turned them down.
"While we believe we would eventually win in court against all of [LAUSD Superintendent] Austin Beutner's anti-union, high-priced attempts to stop our legal right to strike," reads a statement by UTLA, "in order for clarity and to allow members, parents, and our communities to plan, UTLA is moving the strike date to Monday, January 14."
For nearly two years, LAUSD and UTLA have been unable to come to an agreement over lightning-rod issues such as salaries, class sizes, and the hiring of more nurses and librarians. In the run-up to the original strike date, a short-lived lawsuit and a filing snafu have caused unrest and confusion among LAUSD parents who've been hoping for more certainty. UTLA says it hopes the postponement helps address some of that anxiety.
"We do not want to bring confusion and chaos into an already fluid situation," the UTLA statement says.
MORE ABOUT THE POSSIBLE STRIKE
KPCC/LAist editor Mike Kessler contributed to this story.
Hey, thanks. You read the entire story. And we love you for that. Here at LAist, our goal is to cover the stories that matter to you, not advertisers. We don't have paywalls, but we do have payments (aka bills). So if you love independent, local journalism, join us. Let's make the world a better place, together. Donate now.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
With California voters facing a decision on redistricting this November, Surf City is poised to join the brewing battle over Congressional voting districts.
-
The drug dealer, the last of five defendants to plead guilty to federal charges linked to the 'Friends' actor’s death, will face a maximum sentence of 65 years in prison.
-
The weather’s been a little different lately, with humidity, isolated rain and wind gusts throughout much of Southern California. What’s causing the late-summer bout of gray?
-
Hexavalent chromium is the same carcinogen Erin Brockovich warned about in the 1990s, but researchers say more study is needed on the potential health effects of nanoparticles detected earlier this year. Experts will answer questions at a webinar this evening.