One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
Should LA Hospitals Limit Executive Salaries? Voters Will Decide Next Year
A pedestrain crosses a street at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles on Sept. 7, 2012.
(
Frederic J. Brown
/
AFP via Getty Images
)
In March, L.A. City voters will decide whether or not compensation for health care executives should be limited to $450,000 a year. The L.A. City Council cleared the way for a related ballot measure on Wednesday.
“Excessive compensation diverts funds that could be invested in providing high-quality care and expanding access to affordable medical care for all city residents, undermining public confidence that the chief concern of our major healthcare providers is serving the community, not enriching individuals,” the proposed initiative reads.
According to Renée Saldaña, press secretary for SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West, which put forth the initiative petition in February, the proposed ordinance could affect at least 22 executives at non-profit organizations in L.A.
“Many healthcare workers here in the city of Los Angeles are receiving less than $25 an hour, yet at the same time, healthcare executive salaries and bonuses continue to rise,” Saldaña told LAist.
Last week, the Hospital Association of Southern California sent a letter to the council, urging it to leave the proposal up to voters, rather than adopt it outright.
“This policy is deeply flawed and politically motivated, and would have severe consequences for the recruitment and retention of qualified leaders in our local hospitals,” the letter reads.
Sponsored message
Violators of the proposed ordinance could have civil action brought by the City Attorney and face fines.
While the proposal would affect a wide range of executive positions, including chief financial officers and vice presidents, it would not include medical professionals whose primary duties are to provide direct patient care.
L.A. city voters could see the measure on the March 5, 2024 ballot.
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
