Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

Should LA Hospitals Limit Executive Salaries? Voters Will Decide Next Year

The exterior of Cedars Sinai Medical Center with a pedestrian crossing in front.
A pedestrain crosses a street at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles on Sept. 7, 2012.
(
Frederic J. Brown
/
AFP via Getty Images
)

Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your tax-deductible donation now.

In March, L.A. City voters will decide whether or not compensation for health care executives should be limited to $450,000 a year. The L.A. City Council cleared the way for a related ballot measure on Wednesday.

“Excessive compensation diverts funds that could be invested in providing high-quality care and expanding access to affordable medical care for all city residents, undermining public confidence that the chief concern of our major healthcare providers is serving the community, not enriching individuals,” the proposed initiative reads.

According to Renée Saldaña, press secretary for SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West, which put forth the initiative petition in February, the proposed ordinance could affect at least 22 executives at non-profit organizations in L.A.

“Many healthcare workers here in the city of Los Angeles are receiving less than $25 an hour, yet at the same time, healthcare executive salaries and bonuses continue to rise,” Saldaña told LAist.

Last week, the Hospital Association of Southern California sent a letter to the council, urging it to leave the proposal up to voters, rather than adopt it outright.

“This policy is deeply flawed and politically motivated, and would have severe consequences for the recruitment and retention of qualified leaders in our local hospitals,” the letter reads.

Sponsored message

Violators of the proposed ordinance could have civil action brought by the City Attorney and face fines.

While the proposal would affect a wide range of executive positions, including chief financial officers and vice presidents, it would not include medical professionals whose primary duties are to provide direct patient care.

L.A. city voters could see the measure on the March 5, 2024 ballot.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right