Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
Live results: Prop. 44 — requiring clinics to spend more revenue on patient care
Voters will decide whether the state's so-called "safety net” clinics should spend at least 90% of their annual revenue on patient care.
Illustration shows a diverse group of people in the process of voting.
LAist is bringing you live election results.
(
Raymond Rivera
/
For LAist
)
Translate this guide
Translations are performed with AI technology and may produce errors. Read LAist's AI Guidelines here.
Sponsored by
Listen 6:39
Prop. 44: community health clinic spending
This ballot measure would require community health clinics to spend 90% of their revenue on patient care. The prop is being spearheaded by SEIU-UHW and is receiving pushback from organizations like California Primary Care Association and California Medical Association. We lay out the basics.

Proposition 44 would require community clinics that serve low-income people to spend at least 90% of their total annual revenue on providing healthcare services to patients. It would direct the state attorney general to define which clinic expenses would qualify as providing healthcare services.

What to keep in mind about these numbers

  • For LAist's charts showing vote counts, we get numbers directly from the L.A. County and Orange County registrars of voters for local races. Totals are updated on our site as soon as possible after the registrars provide new tallies. For statewide races, counts come from the California Secretary of State's Office.
  • Has your ballot been tallied yet? You can track the status of your ballot here.
  • Keep in mind that, in tight races particularly, the winner may not be determined for days or weeks after election day. That's because early voting and mail-in ballots have fundamentally reshaped how votes are counted and when election results are known. The upshot: Ballots can be postmarked up to and including Election Day. They're counted as long as the ballot arrives within seven days of the election and that window contributes to the lag time before results are announced.
  • In L.A. County, for example, daily updates on the counting are expected to take place at least once a day — usually around 5 p.m. — through Nov. 13. (There will be multiple updates on Nov. 5 and 6.) Then, the once-a-day counts will resume again on Nov. 17, 19, 25 and 27. The office is scheduled to certify election results by Friday, Nov. 27. In Orange County, there will be multiple updates after the polls close, and then daily updates weekdays at 5 p.m. until results are scheduled to be certified on or before Dec. 3.
  • The California Secretary of State is scheduled to certify the election results on Dec. 11.
  • Our priority during the vote count will be sharing outcomes and election calls only when they have been thoroughly checked and vetted by journalists. To that end, we will rely on official results and report when candidates concede. Otherwise, we rely on NPR and the Associated Press for race calls. We will not report the calls or projections of other news outlets. You can find more about NPR's and the AP's process for counting votes and calling races here and here.

Wondering how we got here? Here's the backstory to this race:

What’s at stake?

Community health clinics throughout the state serve low-income and uninsured people with low-cost or free services. According to the Legislative Analyst’s Office, the state’s roughly 2,000 so-called "safety net” clinics currently report spending “an average of about 80 percent of their revenue on providing health care services,” though that number varies across individual clinics. Other expenses include administrative costs and executive pay.

Supporters of the measure, including the health workers union SEIU-UHW, claim that clinics have strayed from their mandate to serve the most vulnerable by spending too many taxpayer dollars on executive salaries and administrative costs.

Opponents of Prop 44, including the California Medical Association, contend that it has major “legal flaws” that could penalize safety net clinics for investing in things like telemedicine and transportation services.

Official title on the ballot: Prop. 44: Requires community health clinics spend 90% of revenue on program services

Language you will see:

Imposes penalties on nonprofit Federally Qualified Health Centers (community clinics providing primary care to medically underserved areas and populations) that spend less than 90% of revenue on “program services” advancing their charitable purpose, including but not limited to patient services. Fiscal Impact: Increased state costs in the low tens of millions of dollars per year, covered by fees.

What your vote means

  • A "yes" vote means: Certain private nonprofit health care clinics would have to spend at least 90% of their revenue each year on providing health care services.
  • A "no" vote means: The new requirement on health care clinic spending would not go into effect.

Understanding Prop. 44

Supporters of the measure say safety net clinics need to make sure they prioritize patient care, especially since planned federal cuts under H.R.1, aka the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, could leave more Californians uninsured. They also say some executive salaries have become too bloated.

What supporters say

  • Led by the health workers union SEIU-UHW, supporters claim that clinics have strayed from their mandate to serve the most vulnerable by spending too many taxpayer dollars on executive salaries and administrative costs. 
  • Notable supporters: SEIU-UHW, a health workers union 

What opponents say

  • Opponents contend that safety net community health clinics are already sufficiently regulated by state and federal governments. They say research shows the measure could cut “$1.7 billion from community health clinics in the first year and billions thereafter” by forcing them to pay noncompliance fees. 
  • Notable opposition: California Primary Care Association, California Medical Association, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, California Hospital Association, California Democratic Party
Live Events

Potential financial impact

According to the Legislative Analyst’s Office, Prop. 44 could create new costs for the state to enforce these requirements, estimated to be in the “low tens of millions of dollars per year.”

The LAO notes other unclear costs too. For example, if some clinics spend more on direct healthcare services for patients on Medi-Cal, that could increase state costs. If some clinics close due to the requirements, that could also indirectly cost the state money.

What it takes to win

A majority is needed to pass.

Watch the ballot cram session analysis

Campaign financing

Further reading

What questions do you have about this election?
You ask, and we'll answer: Whether it's about who's funding the campaigns or how to track your ballot, we're here to help you understand the 2026 election.