With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
Why the legal clock is now ticking on Huntington Beach's voter ID law
The voting booths at the Central Library in Huntington Beach.
(
Frederic J. Brown
/
AFP via Getty Images
)
Listen
0:39
Ruling near on Huntington Beach's controversial Voter ID law
A California appeals court heard arguments Wednesday in dual challenges to Huntington Beach’s voter ID law. The law would allow the city to go beyond state requirements by asking voters to show identification when they cast a ballot, in addition to when they register to vote.
The backstory
Huntington Beach voters approved a measure in 2024 allowing the city to require people to show ID at polling places. That contradicts state law — voters in California are asked to provide ID when they register to vote, but generally not at polling places. The legal wrangling began: the state and a Huntington Beach resident subsequently sued the city. An Orange County Superior Court Judge sided with the city earlier this year. And the state and the local resident appealed the decision ... which brings us to Wednesday's legal arguments.
Sponsor
-
The region currently spends 90% of HUD dollars on permanent housing, but the feds capped it at 30%. -
Weingart Center has been continuously out of compliance for nearly four years, according to an LAist review of records. Audits found multiple failures to properly account for taxpayer money. -
Critics say the current state-approved housing plan will make the city overcrowded.
What does Huntington Beach argue?
The city’s lawyer argued that California’s constitution gives charter cities the right to manage their own elections. He also said it’s too early for the court to strike down Huntington Beach’s voter ID law since the city has yet to lay out any plans for implementing it.
What does the state argue?
In court, a lawyer for California argued that Huntington Beach’s powers as a charter city do not extend to voting because it’s a matter of statewide concern. The lawyer also said it would be impractical since the city would have to keep municipal elections separate from statewide elections, requiring two separate ballots, separate polling places, and separate requirements for casting a ballot.
The bigger picture
Voter identification has long been a controversial issue across the country. States have taken a variety of approaches, and many have been challenged in court. Earlier this year, President Donald Trump issued an executive order on election integrity aimed, in part, at strengthening “voter citizenship verification.” The Department of Justice has also sought access to voter registration rolls across the country. Many states and counties, including Orange County, are fighting the effort in court.
Sponsor
What happens next?
The appeals court has 90 days to issue an opinion in the Huntington Beach case.
-
It marks the second time that the conservative Orange County city has tried, and failed, to challenge the legality of SB 54. -
The additional $150,000 in city dollars is earmarked to help immigrant households pay for housing and utilities. -
One O.C. official is readying to guide families through the sudden shift, despite scant information from federal authorities.
At LAist, we focus on what matters to our community: clear, fair, and transparent reporting that helps you make decisions with confidence and keeps powerful institutions accountable.
Today, on Giving Tuesday, your support for independent local news is critical. With federal funding for public media gone, LAist faces a $1.7 million yearly shortfall. Speaking frankly, how much reader support we receive now will determine the strength of this reliable source of local information now and for years to come.
This work is only possible with community support. Every investigation, service guide, and story is made possible by people like you who believe that local news is a public good and that everyone deserves access to trustworthy local information.
That’s why on this Giving Tuesday, we’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Thank you for understanding how essential it is to have an informed community and standing up for free press.
Today, on Giving Tuesday, your support for independent local news is critical. With federal funding for public media gone, LAist faces a $1.7 million yearly shortfall. Speaking frankly, how much reader support we receive now will determine the strength of this reliable source of local information now and for years to come.
This work is only possible with community support. Every investigation, service guide, and story is made possible by people like you who believe that local news is a public good and that everyone deserves access to trustworthy local information.
That’s why on this Giving Tuesday, we’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Thank you for understanding how essential it is to have an informed community and standing up for free press.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
