With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
Why the legal clock is now ticking on Huntington Beach's voter ID law

A California appeals court heard arguments Wednesday in dual challenges to Huntington Beach’s voter ID law. The law would allow the city to go beyond state requirements by asking voters to show identification when they cast a ballot, in addition to when they register to vote.
The backstory
Huntington Beach voters approved a measure in 2024 allowing the city to require people to show ID at polling places. That contradicts state law — voters in California are asked to provide ID when they register to vote, but generally not at polling places. The legal wrangling began: the state and a Huntington Beach resident subsequently sued the city. An Orange County Superior Court Judge sided with the city earlier this year. And the state and the local resident appealed the decision ... which brings us to Wednesday's legal arguments.
What does Huntington Beach argue?
The city’s lawyer argued that California’s constitution gives charter cities the right to manage their own elections. He also said it’s too early for the court to strike down Huntington Beach’s voter ID law since the city has yet to lay out any plans for implementing it.
What does the state argue?
In court, a lawyer for California argued that Huntington Beach’s powers as a charter city do not extend to voting because it’s a matter of statewide concern. The lawyer also said it would be impractical since the city would have to keep municipal elections separate from statewide elections, requiring two separate ballots, separate polling places, and separate requirements for casting a ballot.
The bigger picture
Voter identification has long been a controversial issue across the country. States have taken a variety of approaches, and many have been challenged in court. Earlier this year, President Donald Trump issued an executive order on election integrity aimed, in part, at strengthening “voter citizenship verification.” The Department of Justice has also sought access to voter registration rolls across the country. Many states and counties, including Orange County, are fighting the effort in court.
What happens next?
The appeals court has 90 days to issue an opinion in the Huntington Beach case.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.
-
Kevin Lacy has an obsession with documenting California’s forgotten and decaying places.
-
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures.
-
It will be the second national day of protest against President Donald Trump.
-
The university says the compact, as the Trump administration called it, could undermine free inquiry and academic excellence.
-
This is the one time you can do this legally!