Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
In Huntington Beach, A Move To Censor Children's Books With 'Sexual Content'
The Huntington Beach City Council passed a resolution early Wednesday stating that no city library will allow children access to books with any sexual content.
The resolution also calls for establishing a committee to review children's library books for sexual content and decide whether to approve books proposed for library acquisition.
The measure was passed by the council's conservative majority on a 4-3 vote after about five hours of public comment that started Tuesday evening, most of it in opposition.
Some likened the proposal to censorship by an authoritarian government.
"Talk about a nanny state," said former Huntington Beach Mayor Connie Boardman during the public comment period.
The city received nearly 550 emails about the proposal, about 95% of them in opposition.
Councilmember Gracey Van Der Mark, who sponsored the resolution, said it's meant to protect children from age-inappropriate content.
The Huntington Beach library system has received just five complaints about books in the past five years, according to a city council presentation.
The details
The resolution requires that all books with any sexual content be placed only on shelves designated for people 18 and older. It also requires minors have a parent or guardian's consent to check out those books.
[Read our earlier story about the book censorship measure.]
In addition, the resolution calls for establishing a "community parent/guardian review board" composed of up to three members appointed by each council member, for potentially 21 members total. The board will review children's books proposed for acquisition by the city library and existing library books flagged by review board members.
What supporters say
Van Der Mark argued against people who characterized the measure as a "book ban," saying books found to be inappropriate for children would be re-shelved in the adult section.
She also argued that community members on the review board will have as much right as librarians to accept or reject books for the public library.
"We should have a right as Huntington Beach residents to have a library that is reflective of our community," Van Der Mark told LAist earlier this week.
What opponents say
Opponents countered that librarians are trained to curate books for a wide diversity of interests and viewpoints.
They called the measure censorship and said it violates people's First Amendment right to receive information. They also said the resolution's sweeping language could open the city up to litigation.
The ACLU Foundation of Southern California and First Amendment Coalition sent a joint letter to the Huntington Beach City Council opposing the measure on constitutional grounds, and saying that, if implemented literally, kids under 18 would need parental permission to access classics like Romeo and Juliet, The Great Gatsby and even the Bible.
Many residents said the measure was simply unnecessary.
"I'd like to point out that we already have a committee of parents to select books, it's called parents," said Lindsay Klick, a Huntington Beach resident who said she's a children's librarian elsewhere in Orange County.
"They don't have to give their child a library card. So they can be their own parental committee of one, selecting the materials for them, with them, at the library."
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The critical findings are part of long-awaited after-action report was released Thursday. It contains recommendations for increasing emergency staffing and updating old systems.
-
Kimmel returned less than a week after ABC suspended his show over comments he made about the assassination of right wing activist Charlie Kirk.
-
Southern California might see some light rain tonight into Wednesday morning. After that, cooler weather is on the way, but expect the humidity to remain.
-
A gate tax at Disney? It's a possibility.
-
UCLA and University of California leaders are fighting Trump’s demands for a $1.2 billion settlement over a litany of accusations, including that the campus permits antisemitism.
-
Wasteland Weekend is all about souped-up rust buckets, spikey costumes and an ‘ideal apocalypse.’