Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your year-end tax-deductible gift now.
Freedom of speech is shifting under the Trump administration. We're exploring how
A series from NPR's "Morning Edition" will explore who felt censored before President Trump returned to office and who feels stifled now.
(
Jackie Lay
/
NPR
)
Listen
11:13
Freedom of speech is shifting under the Trump administration. We’re exploring how
Many Americans are worried that their First Amendment right to free speech is fading.
NPR's Morning Edition has talked to legal experts, activists, immigration lawyers, scientists, students, teachers and others over several weeks to understand why.
Our series "The State of the First Amendment: The Right From Which All Other Rights Flow" will explore who felt censored before President Trump returned to office and who feels stifled now.
Listen
11:13
Listen: First in the series on freedom of speech
Our reporting found that scientists are scrubbing reports and federal grant applications of words the Trump administration has banned. Some student activists are afraid that participating in protests could lead to deportation. Teachers are nervous about a new online portal where students or parents can file complaints about diversity, equity and inclusion lessons in class with the U.S. Department of Education.
"When students make connections to events in history that don't frame the current administration in a positive light and then ask questions, it gives me pause," says E., a high school history teacher, who asked NPR to use only her first initial for fear she could be reported for speaking out. "I've had to hold back, sometimes changing the subject abruptly, telling them that I can't comment."
Sponsored message
Tune in to LAist 89.3 every day this week for in-depth stories on "The State of the First Amendment: The Right From Which All Other Rights Flow."
Yet plenty of others — including anti-abortion activists, the far-right activist group Moms for Liberty and members of university Republican clubs — say they feel more free today to express views without fear of a backlash now that President Trump is back in office.
"We now have more members who are willing to help us publicize the club, attach their faces to the club, and be outwardly and openly conservative than we did before the election," says Miguel Muniz, president of the College Republicans at the University of California, Berkeley.
Free speech ranked as the second most important issue for voters heading into the 2024 presidential election, ahead of crime, immigration and health care, according to a poll by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression taken a month before the election. Republicans were more likely to rate it "very important" and nearly half of Republican respondents said they spoke less freely under President Joe Biden than they did under President Trump.
That may be why soon after President Trump was sworn back into office, one of the first actions he took was to sign an executive order aimed at "restoring freedom of speech and ending federal censorship."
Sponsored message
His critics say his concern for free speech is only for speech his administration finds acceptable.
-
An investigation by ProPublica and The Chronicle of Higher Education reveals how the U.S. government ignored due process to gin up its attack on the University of California. -
Military members have sought advice from groups over legal concerns about their own involvement — or potential involvement — in the strikes against suspected drug boats. -
Under Trump policies, cancer registries in 2026 will have to classify sex data strictly as male, female, or unknown.
You can find all the stories in this series here.
Copyright 2025 NPR
Corrected April 15, 2025 at 7:42 AM PDT
The audio version of this story says that the Supreme Court last year rejected the claim that social media companies were pressured to take down posts about COVID-19 and the 2020 election. It should have noted that the court rejected the claim on procedural grounds but that the justices rejected a lower court’s broad assertion that the companies made all of their decisions to take down posts about COVID-19 and the 2020 elections due to pressure by the government.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
