Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Freedom of speech is shifting under the Trump administration. We're exploring how
Listen
• 11:13
A series from NPR's "Morning Edition" will explore who felt censored before President Trump returned to office and who feels stifled now.
(
Jackie Lay
/
NPR
)
Many Americans are worried that their First Amendment right to free speech is fading.
NPR's Morning Edition has talked to legal experts, activists, immigration lawyers, scientists, students, teachers and others over several weeks to understand why.
Our series "The State of the First Amendment: The Right From Which All Other Rights Flow" will explore who felt censored before President Trump returned to office and who feels stifled now.
Listen
• 11:13
Listen: First in the series on freedom of speech
Support for LAist comes from
Our reporting found that scientists are scrubbing reports and federal grant applications of words the Trump administration has banned. Some student activists are afraid that participating in protests could lead to deportation. Teachers are nervous about a new online portal where students or parents can file complaints about diversity, equity and inclusion lessons in class with the U.S. Department of Education.
"When students make connections to events in history that don't frame the current administration in a positive light and then ask questions, it gives me pause," says E., a high school history teacher, who asked NPR to use only her first initial for fear she could be reported for speaking out. "I've had to hold back, sometimes changing the subject abruptly, telling them that I can't comment."
Tune in to LAist 89.3 every day this week for in-depth stories on "The State of the First Amendment: The Right From Which All Other Rights Flow."
Yet plenty of others — including anti-abortion activists, the far-right activist group Moms for Liberty and members of university Republican clubs — say they feel more free today to express views without fear of a backlash now that President Trump is back in office.
"We now have more members who are willing to help us publicize the club, attach their faces to the club, and be outwardly and openly conservative than we did before the election," says Miguel Muniz, president of the College Republicans at the University of California, Berkeley.
Support for LAist comes from
Free speech ranked as the second most important issue for voters heading into the 2024 presidential election, ahead of crime, immigration and health care, according to a poll by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression taken a month before the election. Republicans were more likely to rate it "very important" and nearly half of Republican respondents said they spoke less freely under President Joe Biden than they did under President Trump.
That may be why soon after President Trump was sworn back into office, one of the first actions he took was to sign an executive order aimed at "restoring freedom of speech and ending federal censorship."
His critics say his concern for free speech is only for speech his administration finds acceptable.
You can find all the stories in this series here.
Copyright 2025 NPR
Corrected April 15, 2025 at 7:42 AM PDT
The audio version of this story says that the Supreme Court last year rejected the claim that social media companies were pressured to take down posts about COVID-19 and the 2020 election. It should have noted that the court rejected the claim on procedural grounds but that the justices rejected a lower court’s broad assertion that the companies made all of their decisions to take down posts about COVID-19 and the 2020 elections due to pressure by the government.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs. -
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
Best of LAist