Voters appear to be evenly divided, so far, over whether to accept a package of proposed changes to Los Angeles County government, including expanding the number of seats on the powerful Board of Supervisors.
By Wednesday morning, the votes for and against Measure G remained split about 50-50. The county Registrar of Voters is expected to update the vote count Wednesday evening sometime after 4 p.m.
Make It Make Sense: Election 2024 Edition
What would Measure G do?
If the measure passes, the county Board of Supervisors would be increased from five seats to nine seats, a change that would happen after the 2030 Census. Currently, each member of the board represents about 2 million people and oversees a $46 billion budget — making policy decisions about things like housing, jails and social services.
Measure G would also change the county CEO position to one that is elected by voters, instead of appointed by the board. That change would happen by 2028.
And it would requires the creation of an independent ethics commission charged with rooting out corruption and increasing restrictions on lobbying. A non-partisan legislative analyst would review proposed county legislation (the city and state have similar positions).
Measure G changes a county governance structure that has mostly stayed the same since 1912 when L.A. County had a population of about 500,000 people. Today, there are 10 million people in the county, which is more than the entire population of most states.
What are people saying about Measure G?
Proponents of the measure, including Supervisors Lindsey Horvath and Janice Hahn, have said the change would make the board more representative of the county population and more responsive to community needs. Horvath and Hahn proposed the reform measure.
Opponents have expressed concern about the costs of the additional positions, as well as politicizing the county CEO position, who handles the county's day-to-day operations.
Supervisors Kathryn Barger and Holly Mitchell abstained from a vote to place the measure on the ballot.
Did LAist help you vote? Member support made these voter guides possible.
Our election coverage is focused on you: helping you understand the results of these races and their impact on our everyday lives. And we don’t stop there, even after results are in, you need a source of trusted reporting that will hold those in power to account and shine a light on issues important to our communities.
Even after the last ballot is cast, LAist reporting and voting guides are here for you. But we need to hear from you now with your support to know that this work we’re doing is important.
We cannot do this essential work without your help. We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
At a time when the need for local journalism has never been greater, many newsrooms are facing cutbacks, including LAist. Member support — your support — is what will sustain a free press in Southern California.
LAist’s mission is to be here for you, so please be here for us now with a donation to power our trusted local reporting. Step up right now and make the choice to give. Because that’s exactly what it is — a choice. It's a choice with consequences. If readers do not choose to step up and donate, the future of fact-based news in Southern California will not be as strong.
No matter what happens in the world, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust.
Thank you for your generous support.
Sincerely,
