Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
NPR News

When Hospital Checklists Don't Tell The Whole Story

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

The whole idea behind HHS’ Hospital Compare website is simple:Patients can shop around by putting in their zip codes, and the site churns out a list of nearby hospitals, with detail on available services, care outcomes, patient satisfaction ratings and more.

The aim: to help consumers – and companies that pay for their care - make informed decisions about where to seek medical care; and to pressure hospitals to improve the quality of their services.

But a report that appears today in the Archives of Surgery says the website isn’t helping Medicare beneficiaries in need of certain high-risk surgery find better facilities.

If hospitals are forced to publicly report the measures they’re taking to prevent surgical infection and blood clots, the thinking goes, they’ll have a stronger incentive to comply with recommended safety measures. And that compliance will reduce the number of preventable deaths from surgical complications.

That may not necessarily be the case, according to this report. Researchers analyzed the information on the Hospital Compare site from Medicare inpatient stays for 325,052 patients in over 2,000 hospitals who underwent one of six “high-risk” surgeries – such as some open-heart procedures – in 2005 and 2006.  Some hospitals only followed certain safety measures in about half the patients, while others did it more than 90 percent of the time.

But interestingly, the higher compliance rate didn’t correspond to a lower rate of post-operative deaths most of the time.

The “safer” hospitals did make a difference in one significant way – patients had a lower risk of having an “extended stay” in the hospital.

Sponsored message

The lack of association may be due to the fact that the CMS only collects data on “low-leverage” safety measures that aren’t good indicators of surgical quality, the report’s authors say. Their bottom line: CMS needs to find better measures and “devote greater attention to profiling hospitals based on outcomes for improved public reporting and pay-for-performance programs.”

Some of this may come as no surprise: Previous studies with the Hospital Compare data have shown wide variations in cost and quality – and found no correlation: if you spend more, it doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll have better care.

Copyright 2023 Kaiser Health News. To see more, visit Kaiser Health News.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today