With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
Fate of Anne Frank's Chestnut Tree in Doubt
Listen
0:00
The chestnut tree in the backyard of the house in Amsterdam where Anne Frank and her family hid during World War II, seen on Nov. 16, 2007.
(
Evert Elzinga / AFP/Getty Images
)
The hundred-plus-year-old chestnut tree that stands just outside of the Amsterdam building where Anne Frank once lived has been granted a reprieve; it had been slated to be cut down Wednesday morning. But now there are new questions about its fate.
Frank often wrote of the tree in the diary she kept while hiding from the Nazis; she lived in a nearby building until 1944.
The Anne Frank museum's plan to remove the diseased tree for safety reasons met with staunch resistance from conservationists and Frank's fans. Amsterdam's Tree Foundation viewed the plan as an undeserving fate for a tree that the city's most famous victim of the Holocaust had been so fond of.
Sponsor
The foundation went to court against the city, and in defense of the tree. A judge granted a reprieve from the ax until at least Feb. 1. But now a new question has arisen, over who is responsible for any damage the tree might incur on the surrounding area if it begins to fall apart.
The Dutch Association of Insurers has now been asked to step into the debate. Willem Terisscha, secretary to the association's board, talks with Robert Siegel.
Copyright 2022 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org. 9(MDA1OTI3MjQ5MDEyODUwMTE2MzM1YzNmZA004))
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
