Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
What Happened To Anthony Avalos? The Head Of LA's Child Welfare Agency Talks About The 'Heartbreaking' Case

Los Angeles County leaders are demanding answers after the death of 10-year-old boy in the Antelope Valley last week.
Authorities were called to a Lancaster apartment Wednesday, June 20, where Anthony Avalos was found unconscious. His mother, Heather Barron, told authorities he fell and hit his head. He died the next day.
The Los Angeles Times reported that concerned teachers and relatives had lodged 13 calls with the county Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS), alleging abuse of Avalos and his six siblings at the hands of his mother and her boyfriend. The callers described instances where the children were beaten, denied food and water, locked in small spaces without bathroom access and sexually abused, among other allegations.
Avalos had been on the agency's radar, but action was never taken to remove the boy or his siblings from the home. Neither Barron nor her boyfriend, Kareem Leiva, have been charged with any crime.
Avalos' death bears a disturbing resemblance to the case of Gabriel Fernandez in Palmdale. Fernandez was 8 years old when he died in 2014 as a result of abuse perpetrated by his mother and her boyfriend. After an investigation found that DCFS staff could have prevented Fernandez's death, reforms were put in place intended to protect the next child from a similar fate.
Now, county officials have launched a criminal investigation into the circumstances surrounding Avalos' death and, once more, DCFS must examine what could have been done to prevent it. County Supervisor Kathryn Barger introduced a motion Tuesday calling for a review of child protective services in the northern portion of L.A. County.
DCFS director Bobby Cagle took over the child welfare agency in December 2017. He spoke with KPCC's Take Two about the lessons learned from the Fernandez case and what DCFS is doing to determine why intervention did not occur for Anthony Avalos. (Responses have been edited for clarity.)
WHAT DCFS KNEW ABOUT ANTHONY AVALOS' HOME LIFE
Q: What's your understanding of what happened leading up to Avalos' death?
Bobby Cagle: We've had a number of calls to this family and all of those did not indicate danger to the child from the mother and the other caretakers. However, we did have eight situations where we went to the home (after) a variety of allegations of maltreatment. Those included, early on, a situation where a relative was found to have sexually abused the child. That was back in 2013 and as time went on we got additional reports concerning general neglect and also allegations of physical abuse. We had substantiated in a couple situations that there was actually general neglect.
Q: How will DCFS determine where the agency may miss opportunities to prevent a child's death?
BC: It requires that we look at every single contact that we had with the family, every piece of information. This was a situation where we had contact with a number of individuals who may have other information. What we have to do in order to better understand this is look at each and every piece of that information and try to piece together exactly what the circumstances were. It's a long process but it's necessary because we need to best understand how this occurred and where to be able to prevent it in the future.
TRAGIC PARALLELS TO THE DEATH OF GABRIEL FERNANDEZ
Q: What do you know about reports that Anthony Avalos, like Gabriel Fernandez, came out to his family before he died?
BC: The extent of my understanding at his point is that the child came out as liking both boys and girls and we don't know more than that at this point. We learned there were concerns there around the sexuality of the child and some families have a lack of understanding of how to deal with that. The similarities are eerie at best.
Q: Both Avalos and Fernandez lived in the northern part of LA county. Does DCFS have enough resources in the Antelope Valley area to make appropriate checks on children?
BC: (Barger's) motion directs the agency, as well as the remainder of county government, to take a look at the kind of resources available there, the kind of organizational dynamics that may be at play that may place children at risk. So, I'm very pleased to see this motion because I think there is valid reason for concern there.
WHAT CHANGED AFTER THE FERNANDEZ CASE AND WHAT'S NEXT
Q: What internal changes were made at DCFC as a result of the Fernandez case and was it enough? Are more checks needed in the system?
BC: The county added 2,600 social workers around the county including having a blue ribbon commission look at each and every aspect of the work that was done in the Fernandez case. We have a budget that has $13.9 million in prevention and aftercare funds in order to be able to better serve families.
Q: Avalos was found with head trauma and scars from cigarette burns on his body. Will his death motivate DCFS to remove children from the home more readily?
BC: I won't say that I hope we remove more children, but I do think it is incumbent upon us to remove every child that we feel is not safe when we are in that home because that's when circumstances like this can occur if we do not act.
The public just needs to know that we are looking very closely at this, making every effort to understand exactly what happened and address those things so that we can make this less likely in the future. It's truly heartbreaking.
News happens every day. Here at LAist, our goal is to cover the stories that matter to you and the community you live in. Now that we're part of KPCC, those stories (including this one you're on right now!) are made possible by generous people like you. Independent, local journalism isn't cheap, but with your support we can keep delivering it. Donate now.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
Monarch butterflies are on a path to extinction, but there is a way to support them — and maybe see them in your own yard — by planting milkweed.
-
With California voters facing a decision on redistricting this November, Surf City is poised to join the brewing battle over Congressional voting districts.
-
The drug dealer, the last of five defendants to plead guilty to federal charges linked to the 'Friends' actor’s death, will face a maximum sentence of 65 years in prison.