Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Looming Court Ruling Weighs On This LA DACA Recipient
Edith Nájera’s house is simple and tidy. It sits on a quiet Gardena street lined with postwar homes and neat green lawns. And for Nájera, it’s the house that DACA built.
She was able to save up enough to buy her home because DACA allowed her to step out of the shadows and work openly, eventually becoming a manager. All that rested on the legal foundation laid in 2012, when former President Barack Obama introduced the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.
DACA was designed to help people like Nájera: young undocumented immigrants who were brought to the U.S. as children. Over the past decade, it has let more than 800,000 people live and work in the U.S. legally on a temporary, renewable basis.
The program has also faced a string of legal challenges, especially in recent years after former President Trump tried to end it in 2017. Legal briefs are due this week in a pivotal Texas case that could ultimately decide the program’s fate.
If DACA is thrown out, everyone in the program — including Nájera — could eventually find themselves without protection from deportation again.
‘I grew up being afraid’
Eleven years ago, Nájera was 25. She was coaching soccer and working in fast food after attending community college, her possibilities limited.
Nájera was 3 when her mother brought her and another sister here from Mexico to reunite with their father. They didn’t have visas. All these years later, Nájera remained undocumented. She remembers growing up under the radar.
“Most of my childhood, I grew up being afraid of saying who I was,” Nájera said.
Her parents were so worried she’d be taken away that for years she wasn’t allowed to go on school field trips. They would instruct her to lay low: “If they ask you, say, ‘American citizen, American citizen! Don't talk to police, don’t talk to the fire department.’”
Then Obama introduced DACA.
‘Anything is possible’
Nájera applied right away. Before long, she had a work permit — and she didn’t have to hide anymore. She remembers a feeling of “anything is possible, like, I wasn't afraid to show up and ask for opportunities.”
She did just that, and got her first job on the books at a Starbucks. Pretty soon Nájera made her way from barista to management. She was getting raises and learning about saving and investing.
“My goal was to continue to make more money,” she said, “continue to have savings and eventually purchase a home.”
Nájera reached that point in 2019, when she and her sister bought their 1,500-square-foot Gardena house. It’s large enough for their parents and a younger sibling to live there as well, enabling them all to escape the cramped two-bedroom rental condo they grew up in.
One recent morning Nájera gave me a tour, stopping in the bright, airy kitchen. A plate of Mexican pan dulce sat under a glass cake dome on the marble kitchen island.
“We love the island,” Nájera said with a smile. “That was one of the first things that we got excited about, ‘cause we never had an island.”
The big, grassy back yard is a novelty, too — a place for their two dogs to play, and for the family to breathe.
“I'll come out here and just lay in the grass,” Nájera said. “That's something that I always dreamed of, just to go out, read or lay down, take the sun, stretch, do some yoga sometimes.”
DACA has let her do so much, said Nájera, now 36. But the life she’s built remains fragile because of DACA’s continuing legal limbo.
‘We’ve had administrations that act foolishly’
In 2021, a federal judge in Texas declared DACA unlawful, saying Obama violated the Administrative Procedure Act in creating it. The ruling stemmed from a legal challenge to DACA brought by several GOP-led states.
The decision was appealed. Last fall, a panel of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the lower court’s ruling, but sent the case back to it for review in light of new DACA regulations drawn up by the Biden administration.
The same lower court judge will now decide if the new DACA rules pass legal muster. Final briefs are due Thursday; a ruling is expected sometime afterward. (Meanwhile, the program is blocked to new applicants; for now, only existing DACA applicants may renew.)
Attorney Thomas Saenz, president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, is representing DACA recipients in the case. He said if DACA is struck down, the case will be again appealed, ultimately to the Supreme Court.
While it’s unlikely DACA recipients would face immediate danger of deportation or losing work permits, Saenz said, things could easily change.
“The concern is that a new administration may come in that would somehow target these young immigrants for removal,” Saenz said, “and that would be foolish. But we've had administrations that act foolishly, in the very recent past.”
Living in limbo takes a toll
Nájera is trying to stay hopeful.
“The best thing I can do is continue to believe that change is going to come,” she said, adding that she’s become more active advocating for immigrant rights, even traveling recently to Washington, D.C. as part of a group calling for broader immigration reforms.
But Nájera admits that after so many years, in spite of all she’s accomplished, trying to stay upbeat is getting harder to do.
Some time ago, she began struggling with depression: “Like not wanting to get up, not wanting to show up to work, things that I love to do,” she said.
Nájera can pinpoint when it started — back in 2017, the year Trump first tried to do away with DACA and the legal battles began.
“What triggered it was the uncertainty,” she said. “Like, what’s next?” She worried about having to go back to Mexico, a place she doesn’t know. Then there was Trump’s anti-immigrant rhetoric, which Nájera said made her feel unwanted.
“I can't believe another human can hate somebody so much, [someone] that they don't know,” Nájera said. “That's when my depression started to hit the walls. That triggered a lot of people.”
Nájera recently decided to take some time off work to heal. But she said it’s been especially tough emotionally in the past months, as tension over the upcoming court decision builds. She’s taking it one day at a time, trying to focus on her accomplishments.
“Right now I'm working on being in the present,” she said. “I have to remind myself that I’m here.”
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.