With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
Lawsuit Says Lancaster Uses Fines To 'Punish Poverty'
The Michael Antonovich Antelope Valley Courthouse in Lancaster. (Chava Sanchez/LAist)
()
The city of Lancaster has been accused of illegally imposing huge fines on homeless and poor people in an effort to "punish poverty," according to a lawsuit filed by the ACLU and UC Irvine's Consumer Law Clinic.
The suit says that Lancaster's administrative citation system "discriminates on the basis of both race and poverty." The L.A. County Sheriff’s Department, which enforces the citations as Lancaster’s police force, is also named in the complaint.
Fines of $500 for a first offense and $1,000 for a second offense can be imposed for sleeping outside or even sitting outside "without a reason," the suit says.
It also slams the city for creating a Catch-22-like system that requires the person issued the citation to pay the fine in full before they can appeal it.
Support for LAist comes from
At the same time, Sheriff's deputies issue citations to Black people at disproportionate rates in Lancaster, according to the complaint. Adrienna Wong is an attorney with the ACLU of Southern California:
"We were able to confirm what members of the community have told us, and what the history of Lancaster really shows, which is a pattern of disparate and increased enforcement against Black members of the community there."
In an emailed statement, Lancaster Mayor R. Rex Parris said the city takes the allegations seriously and will address them.
"Lancaster has been reviewing the existing administrative citation to ensure that it will benefit public health, safety and welfare, while providing persons who commit such offenses an opportunity to avoid criminal proceedings and possible convictions," Parris said.
The Sheriff's Department did not have an immediate comment.
Our news is free on LAist. To make sure you get our coverage: Sign up for our daily newsletters. To support our non-profit public service journalism: Donate Now.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The historic properties have been sitting vacant for decades and were put on the market as-is, with prices ranging from $750,000 to $1.75 million. -
Users of the century old Long Beach wooden boardwalk give these suggestions to safely enjoy it. -
The Newport Beach City Council approved a new artificial surf park that will replace part of an aging golf course. -
The utility, whose equipment is believed to have sparked the Eaton Fire, says payouts could come as quickly as four months after people submit a claim. But accepting the money means you'll have to forego any lawsuits. -
The City Council will vote Tuesday on a proposal to study raising the pay for construction workers on apartments with at least 10 units and up to 85 feet high. -
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol.
Best of LAist