LA Sheriff Villanueva Rehired A Deputy Who Is Now Being Called Unfit To Wear A Badge And Gun
L.A. County's Office of Inspector General said in a report Tuesday that evidence it reviewed "clearly establishes" Sheriff's Deputy Carl Mandoyan is unfit to wear a badge and gun, pointing to the fact that he engaged in domestic violence against a girlfriend and lied about it to the department's internal affairs investigators.
The report is the first independent review of Sheriff Alex Villanueva's decision to rehire Mandoyan, who served as a key aide to Villanueva during his campaign for office last year.
The case ignited a firestorm of criticism from advocates for abused women, the Sheriff's Civilian Oversight Commission and the Board of Supervisors, which sued Villanueva challenging his authority to rehire Mandoyan.
"Substantial evidence exists in support of the Civil Service Commission's holding to sustain Mandoyan's discharge," the report said.
In a key finding, Inspector General Max Huntsman "did not find evidence suggesting that the original discipline process was prejudiced against Mandoyan," said the report, which noted that the sheriff's own "Truth and Reconciliation Panel," which recommended Mandoyan's rehiring, made no mention of a biased department investigation.
The inspector general's report is highly critical of how the sheriff and the panel handled Mandoyan's rehiring, and it describes Villanueva as often uncooperative with the inspector general's efforts to learn more about how the panel works and about other deputies the sheriff is considering rehiring.
Villanueva has rehired four deputies since taking office December 3.
"This Office is aware of no case where a deputy was reinstated under similar circumstances," the report said. It noted that "the Department's efforts to reinstate Mandoyan appear to have begun before his case was evaluated by the Truth and Reconciliation Panel," and that the entire rehiring process "was accomplished in a sharply compressed timeline given the size and complexity of the record."
The memorandum issued by the Truth and Reconciliation Panel "strongly suggests that key pieces of evidence regarding Mandoyan's actions may not have been considered by the Sheriff and his Panel designees," the report said.
The department declined to furnish some requested information to the inspector general, citing the litigation with the Board of Supervisors. "As a result, many questions of how and why the Mandoyan case was selected for re-evaluation remain unanswered," the report said.
Villanueva issued a statement saying he's "extremely disappointed" by the report and the fact that it was released at all, given that the case is the subject of litigation.
"I don't feel this is the best use of tax payer dollars," the sheriff said.
A June 14 letter from the sheriff's lawyer commenting on an earlier draft of the report went further, blasting it as "part and parcel of the coordinated strategy of the Board, County Counsel, and OIG to publicly attack the Sheriff and the Department."
Attorney Steve Madison described the draft as "blatantly skewed" in favor of the Board of Supervisors. He pointed to several examples of what he said were evidence of the inspector general's "demonstrable lack of objectivity."
He said the draft ignored evidence that two of Mandoyan's accuser's former supervisors testified that she was "'unreliable' and 'unprofessional,'" and that she "'lacked credibility.'"
HOW DID IT ALL START?
Caren Carl Mandoyan was hired as a deputy sheriff in 2006. He started dating a fellow deputy when they worked together at the West Hollywood Sheriff's Station in 2012, according to an internal department review of his case. Mandoyan was transferred to the South L.A. Station, but the two kept dating.
Mandoyan's girlfriend accused him of a range of domestic abuse, including an incident in September 2014 in which he "pushed or grabbed her by the arm, placing his hand around her neck and squeezing it restricting her ability to breath," according to the internal review.
Police in El Segundo, where his girlfriend lives, named Mandoyan a domestic violence stalking suspect. A judge issued a temporary restraining order against him.
Mandoyan denied he engaged in domestic violence of any kind.
Former L.A. County Sheriff Jim McDonnell fired Mandoyan in September 2016 citing numerous policy violations pertaining to his conduct toward his girlfriend, domestic violence and dishonesty/false statements. Mandoyan, for example, did not tell the department he was forced to surrender three guns under the restraining order.
Mandoyan appealed his firing to the County Civil Service Commission, which granted his request for a full evidentiary hearing. In May 2018, the Commission issued its ruling upholding Mandoyan's termination.
On Aug. 13, 2018, Mandoyan filed a petition against the county and the sheriff's department, seeking a judge's ruling voiding his firing.
On Aug. 27, 2018, Mandoyan filed a complaint for damages against the county, alleging various violations arising from his case.
THE NEW SHERIFF STEPS IN
During Villanueva's campaign for sheriff in 2018, Mandoyan joined as a volunteer. But he wasn't just any volunteer. He played a key role in rallying deputies to support Villanueva, and served as the candidate's personal driver.
He convened a special panel to review Mandoyan's case, comprised of Assistant Sheriff Timothy Murakami, Chief Eliezer Vera and Chief Steven Gross.
The group met on Dec. 21 to evaluate Mandoyan's case and issued a report on Dec. 27, saying Mandoyan had acted "in an irrational, unprofessional and impulsive manner" and "brought discredit to himself and the department" but still concluded that he should be rehired.
On Dec. 28, Villanueva rehired Mandoyan.
On Dec. 31, Mandoyan filed papers in court seeking to dismiss his two legal complaints.
In testimony to the Sheriff Civilian Oversight Commission on Jan. 22, Villanueva said Mandoyan was wrongly fired, noting the District Attorney did not file charges and saying the department should not get caught up in personal disputes among deputies. He also said Mandoyan's behavior was not related to his work performance - even though his accuser was a fellow deputy.
On Jan. 29, Villanueva drew the ire of members of the County Board of Supervisors when he cast doubt on Mandoyan's accuser's credibility by pointing out that she waited nearly a year to report her allegations and quit the department before she was to testify against Mandoyan.
In a Jan. 30 news conference, Villanueva said he never had a "predetermined outcome" on Mandoyan, that his case was fully vetted by the special panel.
"If the evidence supported termination, he would not be back at work, period," the sheriff declared.
But an email obtained by the Los Angeles Times indicates Villanueva's efforts to rehire Mandoyan began even before he took office. A Nov. 30 email written by a department official said the sheriff had made a "priority request" to county counsel that Mandoyan be reinstated.
The Board of Supervisors asked county counsel to review the rehiring, and on Feb. 20, Villanueva was informed that the county had determined that his action was illegal and therefore void, according to a Feb. 28 letter Auditor-Controller John Naimo wrote to Mandoyan.
Villanueva refused to heed the county's order, and Mandoyan refused to turn in his gun and badge. On March 4, the county filed a petition asking a judge to enjoin Villanueva from recognizing Mandoyan as a deputy, prohibit Mandoyan from presenting himself as a deputy and order Mandoyan to turn in his gun and badge.
On March 6, Judge Mitchell Beckloff rejected the county's request for an immediate order, saying he was unconvinced the supervisors had the authority to override Villanueva's decision. The judge said the case can continue, and set a hearing for June 26.
In a March 5 appearance before the Board of Supervisors, Villanueva said he was "disappointed" they went to court to block his rehiring of Mandoyan without coming to him first.
The sheriff said, "I would come to you first" if he had a dispute with the board.
Villanueva argued the supervisors' legal efforts are "wasting taxpayers' money."
The supervisors pushed back. "We believe you have not operated within the confines of the law" in bringing Mandoyan back, said Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas.
VIDEO AND AUDIO SURFACE
On Thursday, KPCC/LAist obtained documents and videos from the Mandoyan case file from the Civil Service Commission.
"Get the [expletive] out of my house -- get the [expletive] out, Caren," she shouts. "Get the [expletive] out. Get out! Stop, dude! Get out of my house - I'm calling the cops."
The videos are at odds with what Villanueva told the Civilian Oversight Commission on Tuesday. At that meeting the sheriff said that Mandoyan lived with the woman.
Mandoyan's lawyer, Greg Smith, told the Los Angeles Times that in the incidents captured on video Mandoyan was knocking on the door trying to get his girlfriend's attention because she had locked him outside without his keys, backpack and firearm.
In an audio recording the girlfriend made that was obtained by ABC7, Mandoyan says, "you deserve what you got coming."
MORE MANDOYANS AHEAD?
Villanueva has accused McDonnell of wrongly firing dozens of deputies. He's vowed to establish a Truth and Reconciliation Commission to review each termination. The sheriff told the supervisors Tuesday that he could review as many as 400 firings.
"I don't expect all will come back," he said. "Maybe half, maybe less."
Also on March 5, the supervisors unanimously passed a motion ordering the county counsel to report back in 30 days on whether the Truth and Reconciliation panel is legal. The motion also calls on Villanueva to halt his work on the panel pending the county counsel's report. The sheriff told LAist that he will not do so.
So how the Mandoyan case gets resolved could have far-reaching consequences for the sheriff's plans.
"This is going to set the tone for where he goes with bringing in deputies that have been fired," Supervisor Kathryn Barger said.
July 10, 2019: This article was updated to include Villanueva's response to the Inspector General's report and his lawyer's June 14 letter.
July 9, 2019: This article was updated to include the findings of the Inspector General's report.
10:40 a.m., March 28, 2019: This article was updated with information on the video and audio that surfaced.
March 12, 2019: This article was updated to include the account of that day's Board of Supervisors meeting.
This article was originally published on March 8.
-- NORMAL --