With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
LA Fire Department Is Rethinking Its Tattoo Policy. And It Wants Your Help

The Los Angeles Fire Department is seeking public input on whether it should change its tattoo policy.
For more than 15 years, the LAFD has required firefighters to cover their tattoos with a bandage, skin patch, or long sleeve shirt because they deemed them to be unprofessional — to the degree that new recruits with tattoos that can't be covered up aren't hired.
The policy currently states:
"All sworn members, while on duty, shall not display any tattoos, scarification and/or brandings." In addition, "Sworn uniformed members shall cover any visible tattoos, scarifications, and/or brandings by wearing a Department approved uniform or skin patch."
But firefighters have noted several negative effects from the policy, such as operational and response challenges, feeling a lack of acceptance and inclusion, and it's just plain too hot to cover up while doing their job.
Now, with tattoos becoming more acceptable and commonplace, the department is rethinking its stance, particularly following changes set out by the military and other local agencies.
Beginning in March, the Air Force and Space Force have allowed their members one tattoo on each hand and one tattoo on the back of the neck. The inscriptions cannot exceed one inch or portray obscene, racist or violent symbols. Previously, the services allowed only ring tattoos limited to a single band. The changes came amidst steadily decreasing recruitment.
The 8-question survey from the LAFD is open to the general public until Oct. 6, with the aim to understand social attitude toward firefighters wearing tattoos.
"We will then tabulate the responses and collect the data for consideration," said LAFD Captain Erik Scott.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
What do stairs have to do with California’s housing crisis? More than you might think, says this Culver City councilmember.
-
Yes, it's controversial, but let me explain.
-
Doctors say administrator directives allow immigration agents to interfere in medical decisions and compromise medical care.
-
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings.
-
People moving to Los Angeles are regularly baffled by the region’s refrigerator-less apartments. They’ll soon be a thing of the past.
-
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases.