Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Who loses out if the medical deduction disappears?

While the GOP tax plan has come under fire on several fronts, one proposal getting less attention would do away with the medical expense deduction. People like Dale Berman of Burbank say it's helped them a lot.
Berman, 60, says he’s had Crohn’s Disease since he was 15.
"I have to take a lot of over the counter drugs and prescription drugs [so] I can be somewhat normal," he said.
Those prescriptions add up, and the chronic inflammatory bowel disease affects his ability to work, too.
"When you get older the disease takes a toll on your body," said Berman. "So it’s not easy."
Eliminating the medical deduction would increase his tax bill by at least $1,000, he said.
The deduction only kicks in if an individual spends more than 10 percent of his income on medical expenses.
"It’s probably fair to say that Californians numbering in the high hundreds of thousands benefit from the federal medical expenses deduction each year," said Scott Graves, director of research at the California Budget and Policy Center.
That includes "the poor and sick," said Katherine Pratt, a professor Loyola Law School. "And in particular, people with a chronic illness."
Because the GOP’s bill expands the standard deduction, more people will choose not to itemize at all, noted Kim Rueben, senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.
"However," she said, "for the people who have large medical expenses, it will increase their tax bill."
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.