Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Whitman opposes Proposition 23

California Republican Party gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman speaks during a campaign event on September 22, 2010 in Los Angeles, California.
California Republican Party gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman speaks during a campaign event on September 22, 2010 in Los Angeles, California.
(
Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 0:53
Whitman opposes Proposition 23
Whitman opposes Proposition 23

After she refused for months to take a position on Proposition 23, Republican candidate for governor Meg Whitman yesterday announced that she opposes the ballot measure that would indefinitely delay California’s landmark global warming law.

Whitman said that if she becomes governor, she’d use the power of that office to suspend the state’s global warming law for one year.

Proposition 23 would delay the law until the state’s unemployment rate falls to 5.5 percent and stays there for a year. Economists say that could take several years to happen.

The2006 law – known as AB32 – requires California to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 30 percent by the end of the decade.

The former eBay chief executive argues that the new regulations required to do that would hurt businesses and kill jobs. She said her one-year suspension would balance the need for jobs with environmental concerns.

Her Democratic opponent Jerry Brown opposes any delay in putting the new law into effect. He argues that AB32 is important to the environment - and to fostering the state’s green industries.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right