Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
KPCC Archive

While courts hear Trump travel ban, some say damage already done

Supporters cheer as an Iranian citizen with a valid U.S. visa arrives at Los Angeles International Airport Thursday, Feb. 2, 2017.
FILE PHOTO: Supporters cheer as an Iranian citizen with a valid U.S. visa arrives at Los Angeles International Airport Thursday, Feb. 2, 2017, days after President Trump signed an executive order barring people from Muslim-majority nations.
(
Damian Dovarganes/AP
)

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.

Listen 0:54
While courts hear Trump travel ban, some say damage already done
Some of those affected in Southern California say the ban has already had a chilling effect on local families bringing in relatives and those helping asylum seekers.

As U.S. courts consider the fate of President Trump's revised travel ban, families and those helping to bring relatives and asylum seekers to the country say they've already seen negative repercussions from it.

Trump's executive order aims to temporarily limit travel from six predominantly Muslim countries. The travel ban was quickly challenged after it was imposed in January, now several lawsuits are making their way through the court system.

On Monday, a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals judges' panel heard oral arguments in Hawaii's challenge to the travel ban on grounds that it discriminates based on religion. A federal judge in Hawaii blocked the travel ban in March, later extending his order as a preliminary injunction.

Before a three-judge panel in San Francisco, Acting Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall defended the Trump administration's policy on travel, saying that "the order on its face doesn’t have anything to do with religion." 

Sponsored message

Neal Katyal, an attorney for the state of Hawaii, argued that the order is clearly discriminatory against Muslims. Trump's original order barred travel from seven countries: Iran, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Sudan, Somalia, and Yemen. A revised version of Trump's order dropped Iraq from the list.

There was no immediate ruling in the appeal, and ultimately the U.S. Supreme Court may render the final decision on whether the travel ban stands.

Meanwhile, some of those affected in Southern California say no matter how the courts rule, the ban has already had a chilling effect. 

Anaheim immigration attorney Akram Abusharar said some of his clients from affected countries aren't so interested in coming to the United States anymore. They're uncertain about what future they’d have here, he said.

“I have about maybe five clients who have already withdrawn their applications for asylum, and they went to Canada," he said. "A lot of people already left the United States. A lot of people already canceled their plans to come to the United States.”

For Abusharar, who represents Syrian families as well as Iraqis, "the damage already has been done.”

Iranian immigrant Omid Ghassemi of Santa Monica said he was not optimistic that in this climate, a family member who is waiting to come from Iran would make it here.

Sponsored message

Ghassemi and his family spent a long night at LAX in January, shortly after Trump's initial travel ban took effect. They waited as his brother-in-law, who was coming to the U.S. as a new immigrant after years living in Europe, was detained at the airport for hours. 

He made it into the country. But a second brother-in-law is now waiting in Iran on the outcome of his green card application.

“I don’t think he will get here," Ghassemi said. "I’m telling the family, don’t even hold your breath.”

He said both relatives wanted to come here to join their elderly mother, who is in failing health.

Trump has said the ban places limits on travelers and refugees from countries that have harbored terrorists. The administration says the move is temporary while the federal government assesses the ways it reviews those entering the country.

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right