Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Water use in California is increasing. Should we care?
New data out Wednesday show Californians used 15 percent more water this July than the same time last year, continuing a trend that began in June when state officials backed away from mandatory water conservation targets.
While state officials seem unfazed by the increase, others worry it means Californians aren’t taking the drought as seriously as before.
In June, the State Water Resources Control Board ended nearly a year of unprecedented mandatory water conservation across the state. In spring 2015, Governor Jerry Brown asked for a statewide cut of 25 percent. To get there, every water agency would be given a percent reduction target to hit.
But after a wet winter filled reservoirs in Northern California, the board decided to lighten its grip on water agencies. Instead of telling them how much to cut back, the board made them prove they had enough water to make it through three more dry years and not run out of supply. If they could do that, they wouldn’t be required to continue saving water.
More than 80 percent of water agencies in California (343 out of 411) say they passed that test.
Since then, water use in California has been increasing. Californians used an average of 105 gallons per person per day in June 2016, the first month without mandatory conservation. In July, it rose to 114 gallons per person.
Compare that to summer 2015, under mandatory conservation, when per capita use held steady in June and July at 98 gallons per person per day.
See how every individual California water district did below.
Despite the increase, Steven Moore, who sits on the State Water Resources Control Board, praised Californians for their continued conservation. He said there has been a culture change since summer 2013 when Californians were using upwards of 140 gallons per person per day. He said conservation is now a way of life, and residents are “still recognizing there’s a drought.”
There’s a big difference between having conservation be a way of life, and declaring a water emergency, said Ellen Hanak, director of water policy at the Public Policy Institute of California. When Gov. Brown declared statewide mandatory conservation in 2015, that was an emergency. Now Hanak said things are shifting to more of a permanent, long-term change in how much water we use.
“Last year there was probably some belt-tightening that was more of the emergency nature that we could ease up on some, and I think that’s what you’re seeing this summer,” Hanak said.
But Darron Poulsen wishes the belt-tightening would continue. He’s Pomona's director of water and wastewater operations, and his customers are using around 15 percent more water than they did last July – just like Californians as a whole.
“I don’t think that’s OK,” he said. “I would’ve like to see the number lower. There should be continued messaging on this. This is only the start of a new norm of what droughts are going to be like in the future.”
Still, Poulsen let Pomona residents go back to watering their lawn three days a week this summer, up from just one last year – just like many neighboring water agencies.
“I think Californians like their green grass, and like their green landscaping,” he said. “When the opportunity arises to not have be it as restrictive and not as mandatory, people fall back into old water habits.”
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.