With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
Supreme court overturns $4M award to couple shot by LA sheriff’s deputies
Angel Mendez (second to left) and his wife Jennifer Lynn Garcia were shot by L.A. sheriff's deputies in 2010.
(
KPCC
)
Listen
0:46
Supreme court overturns $4M award to couple shot by LA sheriff’s deputies
The case involves a Lancaster couple shot as sheriff's deputies were looking for a parolee. The ruling makes it harder to sue when officers shoot the wrong person.
In a unanimous decision, the United States Supreme Court Tuesday made it more difficult to sue police officers who accidentally shoot the wrong person. The case involved two LA County sheriff’s deputies who shot and wounded Angel Martinez and Jennifer Lynn Garcia in 2010 as they were lying on their bed inside a shack in Lancaster.
The deputies were searching for a parolee. They shot the couple when they entered the shack and saw Mendez holding a BB gun. Mendez was shot 14 times and doctors were forced to amputate his right leg. Garcia, who was pregnant at the time, was shot once in the back. She later gave birth to a baby boy.
A federal judge in L.A. awarded the couple $4 million. The 9th Circuit Court upheld the decision. It said that while the deputies reasonably feared for their lives when they opened fire, the county was liable because they provoked the confrontation by failing to get a search warrant and failing to identify themselves.
But the high court ruled you cannot hold police liable for constitutional violations that occurred before a reasonable shooting. It was a rejection of the so-called provocation rule used by some lower courts.
Sponsored message
"A different Fourth Amendment violation cannot transform a later, reasonable use of force into an unreasonable seizure," Justice Samuel Alito wrote.
The labor union that represents sheriff’s deputies hailed the decision, as did a lawyer for Los Angeles county.
“This case is unquestionably tragic,” wrote Rodrigo A. Castro-Silva, senior assistant county counsel. But a sheriff’s deputy "must be free to make the split-second decision to defend himself and those around him."
Lawyers representing the couple were not immediately available for comment.
The ruling is a setback for law enforcement watchdogs who say police mistakes too often lead to unjustified shootings.
The supreme court sent the case back to the appeals court to consider whether the couple may recover damage for their injuries "based on the deputies’ failure to secure a warrant at the outset."
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
