With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
Los Angeles County Supervisor: Homeless shouldn't be housed in motels that allow prostitution
File: Los Angeles County Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas speaks during an election party for newly elected Los Angeles County Sheriff Jim McDonnell on Tuesday night, Nov. 4, 2014 at the JW Marriott at LA Live.
(
Maya Sugarman/KPCC
)
Listen
1:05
Los Angeles County Supervisor: Homeless shouldn't be housed in motels that allow prostitution
A new proposal by Los Angeles County Supervisor Mark Ridley Thomas aims to clean up hotels that temporarily house the homeless by discouraging prostitution - but his proposal includes a controversial element.
"Children as young as twelve years of age are coerced and are sold for sex," Ridley-Thomas said. "In some cases, hotel owners turned a blind eye to this sickening activity."
His proposal would require hotels that receive county funds to house the homeless - $3.56 million in vouchers last year alone - to agree to anti-prostitution measures. They'd have to display a sex trafficking awareness poster, participate in training to spot sex-trafficking and make hotel guest lists available to law enforcement without a warrant.
That last proposed requirement is controversial.
Sponsored message
"I don't think this is a widespread problem," said attorney Frank Weiser.
He represents a group of hotel owners suing the City of Los Angeles over a similar law requiring hotel owners to make guest registers available to the LAPD. The case, City of L.A. v. Patel, goes before the Supreme Court on Tuesday. A number of other local governments have passed similar laws.
A wide range of businesses and groups - from Google to the Electronic Frontier Foundation - have filed briefs with the court in support of the hotel owners' arguments that the law violates privacy rights.
The city has argued that guest lists are often incomplete and when officers take the time to get a warrant, they sometimes disappear.
Weiser was surprised to hear of Ridley-Thomas's proposal.
"If they want to shut a hotel down, they can easily do it through the courts," Weiser said. "They don't need to be shuffling through people's privacy rights. There are many legal tools."
Ridley-Thomas, however, said the issue needs attention.
Sponsored message
If the board approves his motion, the county's social service department will have 30 days to work out details and enforcement.
"I'm confident the Department of Public Social Services can and should come back to us with an innovative way to house the individuals who deserve to be housed," Ridley-Thomas said. "But not in places where profit is being reaped through exploitation."
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
