Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
California public health department opposes superbug tracking bill
Listen
• 0:50
Centers for Disease Control and prevention microbiologist Tatiana Travis prepares a test to detect drug-resistant pathogens.
(
James Gathany/CDC
)
A bill in the California legislature is designed to improve the state's tracking of antibiotic-resistant infections, but the state's public health agency opposes the measure, arguing that it would be ineffective.
California currently requires hospitals to report three types of antibiotic-resistant infections. SB 43 aims to set up a process for hospitals to track information about even more infections, and to send the data to the state in a special report called an antibiogram.
The California Department of Public Health opposes SB 43, because antibiograms can't be used to determine "numbers of infections or frequency of infections."
The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health is already collecting antibiograms from area hospitals and skilled nursing facilities, which are required to track 19 antibiotic-resistant organisms.
Support for LAist comes from
Antibiograms are "an annual summary of susceptibility rates for selected bacterial pathogens," L.A. County Interim Health Officer Dr. Jeffrey Gunzenhauser wrote in his Jan. 2017 order requiring hospitals and nursing homes that generate these reports to furnish them to the county each year.
The antibiograms' data on local antimicrobial resistance "is combined with clinical expertise to guide optimal antimicrobial treatment for patients with CRE [Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae] or other serious infections," he said.
The Infectious Disease Association of California endorses this tracking method; it says aggregating antibiogram data "will provide valuable information about antibiotic resistance patterns."
In a letter to SB 43 author Sen. Jerry Hill (D-San Mateo) informing him of its opposition, the California Department of Public Health argued that antibiograms don't provide an accurate picture of the scope of antibiotic-resistant infections.
Antibiograms "document the presence of specified bacteria, not specific infections," Public Health's deputy director for legislative affairs Monica Wagoner wrote in the letter. As an analysis "of bacteria isolated from patients with infections ... the antibiogram results are not linked in any way to individual patient data and cannot, therefore, be used to determine numbers of infections or frequency of infections with a particular antimicrobial resistance pattern as required by SB 43," she said.
"We rarely see a ... definitive opinion from a department in the state" about a bill, said Hill. "This is quite unusual and unexpected." He said he’s talking to Public Health about how to overcome its opposition.
The bill won't likely come up again before January, the beginning of the second year of the current two-year legislative session.
Support for LAist comes from
"We’re not going to give up," said Hill. "It’s too important and too much of an issue that has long-term consequences if we don’t continue the fight."
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that antibiotic-resistant infections kill 23,000 Americans each year, and sicken 2 million.
"This is really a war at this point and it looks as if the bacteria are winning that war," Hill said.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline. -
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
Best of LAist