Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
SoCal Gas appeals gas leak-related safety violations
Listen
• 0:53
File: An overhead photo shows the leaking Aliso Canyon well pad near the Porter Ranch community on Dec. 17, 2015.
(
Earthworks via Flickr Creative Commons
)
Southern California Gas Company has appealed penalties imposed by Cal-OSHA for alleged violations of workplace safety at its Aliso Canyon natural gas storage field. That's where a blown-out well forced thousands of Porter Ranch households to move away for months in order to avoid the smell and potential health problems.
Cal-OSHA inspectors cited the company on June 10 for six violations of safe working conditions that happened since Oct. 23, when the leaking well was discovered at the gas field in the Santa Susana Mountains above Northridge
The company appealed the findings on June 27. It said that safety rules were not violated, that the enforcement of the rules was too late and that the Federal Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act preempted the citations based on state work hazard rules.
"We do not believe these citations have merit and we have filed an appeal," said company spokesman Chris Gilbride.
Support for LAist comes from
The violations, if upheld by the Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board, could draw penalties totaling $60,800. It's not uncommon for companies to negotiate lower penalties during the appeals process or get them waived.
Three serious alleged violations
Inspectors found that the SoCal Gas incident commander overseeing the response to the ruptured natural gas well did not have the minimum 24 hours of first responder training that state work safety laws require. The incident commander also didn't know know to implement the company's incident command system, according to the citation. That shortcoming drew a, $8,100 penalty.
Two other serious violations, drawing separate $25,000 penalties, said the company failed to comply with testing and inspection requirements, and to do the necessary work to prevent leaks at the Aliso Canyon gas storage field.
The company failed to ensure that the testing and inspection of piping and casings complied with testing and inspection requirements, the citation said. That violation, also tagged serious, carries a $25,000 penalty. The SoCal Gas appeal said the requirement to fix those problems by June 20 was unreasonable.
In its response to the three serious violations, SoCal Gas said the rules were not violated and that the citations were wrongly classified as serious. The company said the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act preempts the citations for violating the state's laws on hazardous waste operations and emergency response. Plus, the citations were issued too late to be valid, the appeal said.
Three lesser violations
Cal-OSHA cited three lesser violations, each carrying a $900 penalty. SoCal Gas said the company did not violate any of the state safety orders in those cases.
Support for LAist comes from
The citation said the company didn't have records that fire extinguishers had been inspected, and failed to make sure that the extinguishers near leaking well SS-25 were operable. In the appeal, SoCal Gas said it was not the company responsible for placing or maintaining the fire extinguishers.
Two other violations alleged it failed to post a permit to weld around the new relief well, and to clean oil spray that created a slipping hazard on work platforms around the leaking well. SoCal Gas' appeal said the Cal-OSHA inspectors were issuing the citation too late for it to be valid.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline. -
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
Best of LAist