Sponsor
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
KPCC Archive

Slava Voynov domestic violence case: his wife may be forced to testify

In this May 18, 2014, file photo, Los Angeles Kings' Slava Voynov (26) reacts after Chicago Blackhawks' Duncan Keith scored during the second period in Game 1 of the Western Conference finals in the NHL hockey Stanley Cup playoffs in Chicago.
FILE - In this May 18, 2014, file photo, Los Angeles Kings' Slava Voynov (26) reacts after Chicago Blackhawks' Duncan Keith scored during the second period in Game 1 of the Western Conference finals in the NHL hockey Stanley Cup playoffs in Chicago.
(
Nam Y. Huh/AP
)

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.

Listen 0:52
Slava Voynov domestic violence case: his wife may be forced to testify

Prosecutors may want to force Marta Varlamova, the wife of LA Kings hockey player Slava Voynov, to testify against her husband on felony domestic violence charges  – something experts say is unusual, but within state law. Her attorney filed a motion this week to block her from taking the stand.

Deputy District Attorney Frank Dunnick, who is prosecuting Voynov, would not comment directly on the case. But he said in any criminal case, “there is no right to refuse a subpoena.”

“In domestic violence cases, it's very common to have victims who do not want to prosecute, who do not want to testify,” he told KPCC. “But it’s not their case.”

Good prosecutors try to gather enough evidence so they don’t need the victim’s testimony, said CarolAnn Peterson, a longtime domestic violence activist in Los Angeles who is an adjunct professor at the USC School of Social Work. She acknowledged that's not always possible.

Sponsored message

Peterson, who trains police and prosecutors on how to interact with victims, says it’s unusual for L.A. prosecutors to force traumatized victims or victims who have reconciled with their husbands to testify. She said she has seen reluctant victims take the stand.

“I’ve seen some women take the stand and just not say anything,” she said. A spokeswoman for the LA District Attorney could not immediately provide statistics on how often the office forces unwilling domestic violence victims to testify.

Peterson says victims regularly want to avoid testifying against their abuser.

Requiring testimony from an allegedly abused woman against her abuser is a hot topic among domestic violence experts.

“If you talk to any of the prominent advocates on behalf of women, this is one of the things they did not want to happen,” said Richard Gelles, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania School of Social Policy and Practice and nationally recognized expert on domestic violence.

“They don’t want a male-dominated criminal justice system to coerce and control women into testifying,” he said.

He noted domestic violence occurs in not just male-female relationships.

Sponsored message

California law, unlike some other states, says victims must testify if prosecutors subpoena them.

“The prosecutor’s duty is not just to the victim in this case,” said USC Law Professor Heidi Rummel. “It’s obviously to public safety and to prosecute crimes that have been committed.”

“If testifying makes the abuser very angry, then they indeed may retaliate,” Peterson said. “It means you have a victim that could potentially be in danger.”

Next month, the judge in the Voynov case hears the motion by his wife’s attorney that she not be forced to testify.

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right