Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
San Francisco eyes stricter reporting of politician-linked donations
Listen
• 0:47
A view of downtown San Francisco and the western span of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge on Sept. 8, 2013 in San Francisco, California.
(
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
)
New light in foggy San Francisco could soon be turned on the politician-linked practice of "behested payments" that prompted a KPCC investigation earlier this year.
San Francisco's proposed regulations would require significant disclosures about where the behested money goes, and even how it's spent by nonprofits. Behested payments are the thorny fundraising practice that elected officials use to raise money for pet causes, sometimes approaching individuals and companies that do business with government.
In San Francisco, elected officials, donors and charities could all face new reporting requirements — and stricter scrutiny of their activity — if the regulations become law. The proposed rules took a step forward Monday night, advancing out of the city's Ethics Commission and on to its Board of Supervisors.
Government watchdogs consider behested payments — which are unlimited and can reach six and seven figures — a form of influence buying, while those involved often counter that public officials are using the process to provide funding for worthy causes.
Support for LAist comes from
Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti has raised more than $31 million in behested payments since his election, far more than statewide politicians, including Gov. Jerry Brown. The KPCC investigation tracked the flow of the money and conflict of interest concerns sparked by the eye-popping sums.
San Francisco's regulations would not bar behested payments from those with business before the city, as an earlier draft of the regulations proposed. The Ethics Commission couldn't muster the votes required for that version.
Instead, the proposal was reworked to boost disclosure on all sides of the process:
- Public officials would have to report any behested payment of over $1,000 by a person or group with business before the official. State law only requires reporting of payments over $5,000. Officials would also have to disclose family ties with any organization receiving a payment.
- Donors making behested payments must disclose matters they are involved with before the city, and decisions by an official they are actively supporting or opposing.
- Recipients would in some cases have to report how they spent the money received from behested payments. This requirement kicks in for groups that receive more than $100,000 in a year.
No such regulations exist or are imminent in Los Angeles.
San Francisco’s disclosures would go far beyond what’s currently required by state law.
"You want government officials who are making decisions about government issues on the merits," said San Francisco Ethics Commission President Peter Keane. "Not because they're receiving something."
In a memo to the Ethics Commission by analysts Pat Ford and Kyle Kundert, the duo spell out the reasoning behind the rules: "These disclosures seek to identify how a person who makes a behested payment may be seeking to influence the behesting official's decision-making," they write.
Support for LAist comes from
They call behested payments over $100,000 "exceptional amounts" and write "it is important to know whether such organizations use the funds in a way that benefits the behesting official."
The regulations passed by a vote of 4 to 1. Keane expects the supervisors to face resistance from nonprofits and other groups that benefit from the payments. He told KPCC that if the Board of Supervisors fails to pass the regulations, the Ethics Commission will use its power to place the ordinance on the ballot in 2018, putting it directly to voters.
Explore payments behested by Mayor Garcetti
Further details available here
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs. -
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
Best of LAist