Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Responsible Banking Ordinance goes before LA City Council committee

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 1:07
Responsible Banking Ordinance goes before LA City Council committee
Responsible Banking Ordinance goes before LA City Council committee

The Los Angeles City Council’s budget committee Monday debated a proposed Responsible Banking Ordinance. The measure, with strong backing from Occupy L.A. protesters, seeks to compel the city to do business with socially responsible banks.

The measure’s most vocal backer, Councilman Richard Alarcon, says the city should ask a few questions of the banks in which L.A. deposits billions of dollars.

“Were they aggressively pursuing modifications for home loans, for example, or did they sit back and foreclose on thousands of people in our community?" Alarcon asked. "Why should we give them our people’s money if they’ve been a bad player in our community?”

But rating banks, and bond underwriters, is a complicated business, says City Administrative Officer Miguel Santana. He supports asking banks about their lending and reinvestment practices, but opposes issuing a uniform scorecard for financial institutions.

“Unfortunately, the city doesn’t have the resources to do that or the expertise," Santana said. "And it’s not really part of the city’s principle responsibility.”

Supporters of the Responsible Banking Ordinance worry that Santana is under pressure from banks to water down the measure. The full city council promised to consider some form of the ordinance after hundreds of Occupy L.A. protesters filled council chambers last month demanding action on a measure that’s languished in committee for more than a year.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right