With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
Report finds I-10 express lanes shave about 2 mins off your drive; bus ridership rises
Solo drivers who paid extra to use those express lanes on the 10 and 110 freeways over the past year generally got to their destinations faster than those who didn't pay.
That's according to a new report released Monday by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority. The report took a look at the one-year pilot express lanes program aimed at reducing traffic congestion. This was a $210 million federally-funded program, which also added more buses, vanpools and improvements to the El Monte Station. The pilot run ended in February.
The report also shows the 10 Freeway had better overall results than the 110 Freeway during the morning rush hours.
"On the 10 Freeway we had the advantage because there were actually two lanes of expresslanes that were accomplished on the 10 Freeway vs the 110 Freeway,” said Metro Spokesman Rick Jagger.
Commuters taking the 10 during rush hour got to their destinations more than two minutes faster on average, Jagger said. That includes drivers in both the express lanes and regular lanes. But commuters on the 110 actually saw their drive times grow by an average of two minutes.
RELATED: MAP: 110 Freeway 'FasTrak' express lanes take a toll on drivers starting Nov. 10
Bus ridership along the 10 and 110 Freeways also went up 27 percent in that time.
“The program funded the purchase of 59 compressed natural gas buses to run up and down those two corridors to offer people an alternative to driving solo in their car,” said Jagger.
Another key goal for the pilot programs was to keep those express lanes moving at least 45mph. Metro said that was accomplished 90 percent of the time.
The toll lanes are still in use, even though the pilot program is over. Jagger said Metro wants to continue the program past its expiration date of January 15, 2015.
Metro Board members will take a look at the issue when they meet this Thursday.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
-
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol.
-
Kevin Lee's Tokyo Noir has become one of the top spots for craft-inspired cocktails.
-
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight.
-
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious.
-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress.
-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.