Sponsor
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
KPCC Archive

South Bay beach cities staring down short-term rentals

Hermosa Beach is among the waterfront communities in the South Bay restricting short-term rentals.
Hermosa Beach is among the waterfront communities in the South Bay restricting short-term rentals.
(
Oliver Tardy via Flickr
)

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.

Listen 0:56
South Bay beach cities staring down short-term rentals

Redondo Beach and Hermosa Beach are the latest waterfront communities to crack down on short-term rentals popularized by sites such as Airbnb.

But it'll be hard to enforce any new laws, if the recent experiences of other cities are an indicator.

In the last year, Santa Monica and Manhattan Beach both passed broad-reaching laws restricting short-term rentals but face challenges getting landlords and online platforms to abide by the rules.

But in Redondo Beach, Mayor Steve Aspel said the city has to do something. The council voted unanimously on Tuesday to start enforcing its ban on short-term rentals that last less than 30 days.

Sponsored message

Aspel said the city gets weekly complaints from neighbors about short-term rental guests creating too much noise, and throwing parties.

"We're not trying to be the Grinch here and cut down on people's fun, but we want to give neighbors the ability to sleep at night," Aspel said.

Aspel said the city will start out by sending out letters to short-term rental hosts telling them to abide by local laws. At a later date, officials will decide what kind of fines to impose on violators.

"The first time, maybe a couple hundred bucks, for the second time move it to $500, then $1,000," Aspel suggested. "You have to make it very painful for people."

Lauren Amarante, a short-term rental host and member of the Los Angeles Short Term Rental Alliance, said she hopes the city will include her industry in talk of regulations.

Too much is at stake, she said, for the guests who prefer short-term rentals over hotel stays, and for the cottage industry that depends on their business.

"This creates a living wage for me and the several cleaners and landscaper that I employ," said Amarante, who manages short-term rentals in both Redondo Beach and Hermosa Beach.

Sponsored message

Hermosa Beach officials are also looking at tighter regulations on short-term rentals, said Ken Robertson, the city's director of community development. Options that will be discussed at a March 15 meeting range from an outright ban to restricting them to certain parts of the city.

Robertson said it's a challenging issue because he can see the neighbors' concerns about short-term rental guests being too disruptive, parking in front of their yards and leaving out the trash.

But he said short-term rentals "are serving a need, as well as helping (hosts) afford to continue to live in the community."

The city of Manhattan Beach went through a similar debate last summer before it decided to ban short-term rentals under 30 days long. The law took effect in January, said Kendra Davis, a fellow in the city manager’s office.

"It’s one of those things that's difficult unless you can catch someone in the act," Davis said. "We don’t know personally each owner of each property or who’s living there, so it’s difficult in enforcing that."

In Santa Monica, the city has spent close to $200,000 on enforcing a law that only allows  short-term rentals when the owner is on the premises. The city said it has made 650 citations, directing all but about 100 of them to Airbnb and another leading short-term rental platform, VRBO.

Industry leader Airbnb said that it's following the different regulations before California cities. "We are continuing to highlight the importance of fair rules with leaders throughout Southern California," said spokeswoman Alison Schumer.

Sponsored message

This story has been updated.

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right