Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Proposed LA pot law may confict with judge's opinion

In this Oct. 22, 2009 file photo, a bud of legally grown marijuana is held by a cancer patient, in Portland, Maine. It's not easy to tell the difference between legal medical marijuana and illegal recreational pot.
In this Oct. 22, 2009 file photo, a bud of legally grown marijuana is held by a cancer patient, in Portland, Maine. It's not easy to tell the difference between legal medical marijuana and illegal recreational pot.
(
AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 0:48
Proposed LA pot law may confict with judge's opinion
Proposed LA pot law may confict with judge's opinion

The Los Angeles City Council plans to move forward with a medical marijuana ordinance that would allow people to exchange cash for pot, despite a judge’s opinion that suggests such transactions are illegal.

Los Angeles City Councilman Ed Reyes said that the opinion is one interpretation of a vague state law - and that it’s likely to be appealed.

In comments during a hearing involving an Eagle Rock pot shop, L.A. Superior Court Judge James Chalfant said he doesn’t believe that a storefront dispensary that sells marijuana is legal.

The council’s considering whether to allow “cash contributions, reimbursements and compensations for the actual expenses” of growing and providing medical marijuana.

But the judge said a pot shop owner could pay himself a large sum of money, call it an expense, and – in the judge’s words – “any way you slice that banana, that is the sale of marijuana for profit.”

The City Council’s debated the issue for weeks. It’s expected to vote on a new ordinance next week.

[KPCC wire services contributed to this report]

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right