Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
KPCC Archive

Was Orange County's devastating Canyon Fire 2 preventable?

Firemen survey the damage to homes in the Anaheim Hills neighborhood on October 9, 2017, after the Canyon Fire 2 spread quickly through the area.
Firemen survey the damage to homes in the Anaheim Hills neighborhood on October 9, after the Canyon Fire 2 spread quickly through the area. Some local leaders are now questioning whether the fire could have been stopped before it got out of control.
(
FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP/Getty Images
)

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.

Listen 0:58
Was Orange County's devastating Canyon Fire 2 preventable?
The Orange County Fire Authority is facing tough questions about its response to the Canyon Fire 2, which burned more than 14 square miles and destroyed 15 homes.

The Orange County Board of Supervisors is demanding answers to alleged missteps in the OC Fire Authority’s response to the so-called Canyon Fire 2 . At the board’s Tuesday meeting, Supervisors Shawn Nelson and Todd Spitzer  questioned why firefighters didn’t take initial reports of the fire more seriously, among other questions that have emerged about the fire response. 

Last week, the fire authority released a timeline of its actions on Oct. 9, the day the fire started, along with recordings of several 911 calls it received from people who reported seeing smoke and flames that morning. 

One man who was driving on the 91 freeway called at 8:32 a.m. to report seeing flames on a hill above the 241 toll road. 

After pressing the man on whether he actually saw flames, the dispatcher called the nearest fire station and asked them to "send somebody out there to go check outside and see if you guys see a fire over there by the 91 and like, I don’t know, 241 area."

Sponsored message

Shortly afterwards, someone from the station called the dispatch center back to say it seemed to be just ash from the first Canyon Fire, which had burned an adjacent area less than two weeks earlier. 

Firefighters didn’t initiate a full response to the fire until more than an hour later. By that time, it was burning out of control and threatening homes. Several thousand residents were ordered to evacuate later that morning.   

On Tuesday, Supervisor Nelson slammed the Fire Authority for not taking the first 911 call more seriously. 

"The gentleman said 'fire,' 'flames,' and he was challenged, as if the average person wouldn’t know fire when they saw it."

Supervisor Spitzer called that initial response "inexcusable."

The supervisors also questioned why an engine from a fire station near the area where the Canyon Fire 2 started had been sent to Sonoma County earlier that morning, despite warnings from the National Weather Service of extreme fire danger in the area. 

"On a Santa Ana wind day in October, you could have a major problem instantly," Nelson said.

Sponsored message

Interim Fire Chief Patrick McIntosh told supervisors he took the allegations about a slow response seriously.

"I do believe there are questions we need answers to," he said.

The OC Fire Authority’s Board of Directors has authorized an independent investigation of firefighters’ response to Canyon Fire 2. The board of supervisors is launching its own inquiry into the response via an ad hoc committee made up of Spitzer and Nelson.  

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right